Improving Sar Automatic Target Recognition Using Simulated Images Under Deep Residual Refinements

In recent years, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been successfully applied for automatic target recognition (ATR) in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data. However, it is challenging to train a CNN with high classification accuracy when labeled data is limited. This is often the case with SAR ATR in practice, because collecting large amounts of labeled SAR data is both difficult and expensive. Using a simulator to generate SAR images offers a possible solution. Unfortunately, CNNs trained on simulated data may not be directly transferable to real data. In this paper, we introduce a method to refine simulated SAR data based on deep residual networks. We learn a refinement function from simulated to real SAR data through a residual learning framework, and use the function to refine simulated images. Using the MSTAR dataset, we demonstrate that a CNN-based SAR ATR system trained on simulated data under residual network refinements can yield much higher classification accuracy as compared to a system trained on simulated images, and so can training on real data augmented with these simulated data under refinements compared to training with real data alone.

[1]  Haipeng Wang,et al.  SAR target recognition based on deep learning , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA).

[2]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Generative Adversarial Nets , 2014, NIPS.

[3]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolution , 2016, ECCV.

[4]  Chris Kreucher,et al.  Modern approaches in deep learning for SAR ATR , 2016, SPIE Defense + Security.

[5]  Michael Lee Bryant,et al.  Standard SAR ATR evaluation experiments using the MSTAR public release data set , 1998, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[6]  Julian Holtzman,et al.  Radar Image Simulation , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Electronics.

[7]  Hongwei Liu,et al.  Convolutional Neural Network With Data Augmentation for SAR Target Recognition , 2016, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[8]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[9]  Soumith Chintala,et al.  Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks , 2015, ICLR.

[10]  David J. Sakrison,et al.  The effects of a visual fidelity criterion of the encoding of images , 1974, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[11]  Gabriele Moser,et al.  SAR amplitude probability density function estimation based on a generalized Gaussian model , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  Douglas A. Gray,et al.  Detecting scene changes using synthetic aperture Radar interferometry , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[14]  Allan Aasbjerg Nielsen,et al.  Improving SAR Automatic Target Recognition Models With Transfer Learning From Simulated Data , 2017, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[15]  Thomas L. Marzetta,et al.  EM algorithm for estimating the parameters of a multivariate complex Rician density for polarimetric SAR , 1995, 1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[16]  Christian Cochin,et al.  Classification of ships using real and simulated data in a convolutional neural network , 2016, 2016 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf).

[17]  Christian Ledig,et al.  Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network , 2016, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[18]  Tomas Pfister,et al.  Learning from Simulated and Unsupervised Images through Adversarial Training , 2016, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).