Perceived benefit and mental health after three types of disaster.

The study of growth and perceived benefit after traumatic events has been hailed as one of the most promising directions for stress research. This research, however, has been limited by several methodological limitations. These limitations are addressed in this prospective study, which examines perceived benefit and mental health adjustment after 3 different types of disaster. Survivors of a tornado in Madison, Florida, had the highest rates of perceived benefit, followed by survivors of a mass killing in Killeen, Texas, and survivors of a plane crash in Indianapolis, Indiana. Perceived benefit 4-6 weeks postdisaster predicted posttraumatic stress disorder 3 years later. Perceived benefit moderated the effect of severity of disaster exposure on mental health diagnosis change over time. Without perceived benefit, as exposure severity increased, the amount of recovery decreased. If benefit was perceived, as exposure severity increased, the amount of recovery increased. Implications for clinical interventions and future research are discussed.

[1]  S. Chizeck.  Stress, Coping, and Development: An Integrative Perspective , 1997 .

[2]  J. Gibson.  Compensating for missing data in social work research , 1992 .

[3]  G. Affleck,et al.  Construing benefits from adversity: adaptational significance and dispositional underpinnings. , 1996, Journal of personality.

[4]  Christopher G. Davis,et al.  Positive and Negative Life Changes Following Bereavement and their Relations to Adjustment , 1993 .

[5]  M. Horowitz.  Stress response syndromes , 1976 .

[6]  J. Anthony,et al.  8 – The Diagnostic Interview Schedule , 1985 .

[7]  S. Thompson.  Finding Positive Meaning in a Stressful Event and Coping , 1985 .

[8]  R. Tedeschi,et al.  The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma , 1996, Journal of traumatic stress.

[9]  P. Thoits,et al.  Stress, coping, and social support processes: where are we? What next? , 1995, Journal of health and social behavior.

[10]  D. F. Gillespie,et al.  Fitting regression models to research questions for analyzing change in nonexperimental research , 1994 .

[11]  R. Moos,et al.  Life crises and personal growth. , 1992 .

[12]  Elizabeth M. Smith,et al.  Posttraumatic stress disorder in survivors of a mass shooting. , 1994, The American journal of psychiatry.

[13]  Causal attribution, perceived benefits, and morbidity after a heart attack: an 8-year study. , 1987, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[14]  Crystal L. Park,et al.  Assessment and prediction of stress-related growth. , 1996, Journal of personality.

[15]  J. V. Wood,et al.  It Could Be Worse: Selective Evaluation as a Response to Victimization , 1983 .

[16]  P. Ebersole,et al.  Positive impact of life crises. , 1989 .

[17]  J. Pennebaker.  Putting stress into words: health, linguistic, and therapeutic implications. , 1993, Behaviour research and therapy.

[18]  Glenn Affleck,et al.  Infants in crisis : how parents cope with newborn intensive care and its aftermath , 1990 .

[19]  M. Burt,et al.  Dimensions of Recovery from Rape , 1987 .

[20]  F. Willits,et al.  Examining change using regression analysis: Three approaches compared , 1991 .

[21]  Elizabeth M. Smith,et al.  Acute postdisaster coping and adjustment , 1989 .

[22]  Perceived benefit from child sexual abuse. , 1995 .