Associations among Image Assessments as Cost Functions in Linear Decomposition: MSE, SSIM, and Correlation Coefficient

The traditional methods of image assessment, such as mean squared error (MSE), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and Peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), are all based on the absolute error of images. Pearson's inner-product correlation coefficient (PCC) is also usually used to measure the similarity between images. Structural similarity (SSIM) index is another important measurement which has been shown to be more effective in the human vision system (HVS). Although there are many essential differences among these image assessments, some important associations among them as cost functions in linear decomposition are discussed in this paper. Firstly, the selected bases from a basis set for a target vector are the same in the linear decomposition schemes with different cost functions MSE, SSIM, and PCC. Moreover, for a target vector, the ratio of the corresponding affine parameters in the MSE-based linear decomposition scheme and the SSIM-based scheme is a constant, which is just the value of PCC between the target vector and its estimated vector.

[1]  Edward R. Vrscay,et al.  SSIM-inspired image restoration using sparse representation , 2012, EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing.

[2]  Zhou Wang,et al.  On the Mathematical Properties of the Structural Similarity Index , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[3]  Y. C. Pati,et al.  Orthogonal matching pursuit: recursive function approximation with applications to wavelet decomposition , 1993, Proceedings of 27th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[4]  M. Elad,et al.  $rm K$-SVD: An Algorithm for Designing Overcomplete Dictionaries for Sparse Representation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[5]  Nanning Zheng,et al.  Parameter analysis of fractal image compression and its applications in image sharpening and smoothing , 2013, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[6]  Liangbao Yang,et al.  Capillarity-constructed reversible hot spots for molecular trapping inside silver nanorod arrays light up ultrahigh SERS enhancement , 2013 .

[7]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Information Content Weighting for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  Javier Vazquez-Corral,et al.  Fusion-Based Variational Image Dehazing , 2017, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[9]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  David J. Field,et al.  Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1? , 1997, Vision Research.

[11]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Structural Similarity-Based Affine Approximation and Self-similarity of Images Revisited , 2011, ICIAR.

[12]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Structural Similarity-Based Approximation of Signals and Images Using Orthogonal Bases , 2010, ICIAR.

[13]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Translation insensitive image similarity in complex wavelet domain , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[14]  Sung-Ho Bae,et al.  A novel SSIM index for image quality assessment using a new luminance adaptation effect model in pixel intensity domain , 2015, 2015 Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP).

[15]  Richard Dosselmann,et al.  A comprehensive assessment of the structural similarity index , 2011, Signal Image Video Process..

[16]  Nanning Zheng,et al.  Fractal image coding using SSIM , 2011, 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[17]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..