Interpreting Reading Comprehension Test Results: Quantile Regression Shows that Explanatory Factors Can Vary with Performance Level

ABSTRACT One of the most important findings to emerge from recent reading comprehension research is that there are large differences between tests in what they assess—specifically, the extent to which performance depends on word recognition versus listening comprehension skills. Because this research used ordinary least squares regression, it is not clear that the findings apply similarly to poor and good readers. The current study uses quantile regression to assess whether there might be differences within tests in the relative contributions of component skills as a function of performance level. There were 834 individuals (ages 8–18) who took 5 reading comprehension tests. Quantile regression showed that, for 3 of 5 tests, the contributions of word recognition and listening comprehension vary as a function of reading comprehension skill. These quantile differences hold across both younger and older readers. Our findings show that what skills a test assesses vary not only with the specific test used but also with how well the person performs.

[1]  Jack M. Fletcher,et al.  Dimensions Affecting the Assessment of Reading Comprehension , 2005 .

[2]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[3]  Heritability Across the Distribution: An Application of Quantile Regression , 2012, Behavior genetics.

[4]  Laurie E. Cutting,et al.  Prediction of Reading Comprehension: Relative Contributions of Word Recognition, Language Proficiency, and Other Cognitive Skills Can Depend on How Comprehension Is Measured , 2006 .

[5]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. , 2006, The British journal of educational psychology.

[6]  Jessica A. R. Logan,et al.  Quantile regression in the study of developmental sciences. , 2014, Child development.

[7]  R. Koenker,et al.  Robust Tests for Heteroscedasticity Based on Regression Quantiles , 1982 .

[8]  M. Barnes,et al.  The effects of knowledge availability and knowledge accessibility on coherence and elaborative inferencing in children from six to fifteen years of age. , 1996, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[9]  Janice M. Keenan,et al.  Comprehending the Gray Oral Reading Test Without Reading It: Why Comprehension Tests Should Not Include Passage-Independent Items , 2006 .

[10]  Mary E. Curtis,et al.  Development of Components of Reading Skill. , 1980 .

[11]  S. Ellis Weismer,et al.  Language deficits in poor comprehenders: a case for the simple view of reading. , 2006, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[12]  T. Breurch,et al.  A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation (econometrica vol 47 , 1979 .

[13]  Richard K. Olson,et al.  Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. , 1994 .

[14]  Hugh W. Catts,et al.  The Connections between Language and Reading Disabilities , 2005 .

[15]  M. Habib Assessment of Reading Comprehension , 2016 .

[16]  R. Olson Genes, environment, and dyslexia the 2005 Norman Geschwind memorial lecture , 2006, Annals of dyslexia.

[17]  J. Keenan,et al.  Test Differences in Diagnosing Reading Comprehension Deficits , 2014, Journal of learning disabilities.

[18]  Naomi S. Altman,et al.  Quantile regression , 2019, Nature Methods.

[19]  R. Koenker Quantile Regression: Name Index , 2005 .

[20]  K. Nation,et al.  Assessing reading difficulties: the validity and utility of current measures of reading skill. , 1997, The British journal of educational psychology.

[21]  Lauren Leslie,et al.  Qualitative Reading Inventory-4 , 2005 .

[22]  J. Keenan,et al.  Reading Comprehension Tests Vary in the Skills They Assess: Differential Dependence on Decoding and Oral Comprehension , 2008 .

[23]  Frank R. Vellutino,et al.  Components of Reading Ability: Multivariate Evidence for a Convergent Skills Model of Reading Development , 2007 .

[24]  Jane Oakhill,et al.  Reading comprehension difficulties:correlates, causes, and consequence , 2007 .

[25]  Richard K. Olson,et al.  Genetic and environmental influences on reading and listening comprehension , 2006 .

[26]  Philip B. Gough,et al.  Decoding, Reading, and Reading Disability , 1986 .

[27]  Hugh W. Catts,et al.  Developmental Changes in Reading and Reading Disabilities , 2005 .

[28]  Anh N. Hua,et al.  Issues in Identifying Poor Comprehenders. , 2014, L'annee psychologique.

[29]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Chapter 9 Toward a Comprehensive Model of Comprehension , 2009 .

[30]  Barbara J. Wendling,et al.  Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. , 2009 .

[31]  R. Koenker,et al.  Regression Quantiles , 2007 .

[32]  Elizabeth L. Tighe,et al.  A Quantile Regression Approach to Understanding the Relations Among Morphological Awareness, Vocabulary, and Reading Comprehension in Adult Basic Education Students , 2016, Journal of learning disabilities.