Tethering Sister Centromeres to Each Other Suggests the Spindle Checkpoint Detects Stretch within the Kinetochore

The spindle checkpoint ensures that newly born cells receive one copy of each chromosome by preventing chromosomes from segregating until they are all correctly attached to the spindle. The checkpoint monitors tension to distinguish between correctly aligned chromosomes and those with both sisters attached to the same spindle pole. Tension arises when sister kinetochores attach to and are pulled toward opposite poles, stretching the chromatin around centromeres and elongating kinetochores. We distinguished between two hypotheses for where the checkpoint monitors tension: between the kinetochores, by detecting alterations in the distance between them, or by responding to changes in the structure of the kinetochore itself. To distinguish these models, we inhibited chromatin stretch by tethering sister chromatids together by binding a tetrameric form of the Lac repressor to arrays of the Lac operator located on either side of a centromere. Inhibiting chromatin stretch did not activate the spindle checkpoint; these cells entered anaphase at the same time as control cells that express a dimeric version of the Lac repressor, which cannot cross link chromatids, and cells whose checkpoint has been inactivated. There is no dominant checkpoint inhibition when sister kinetochores are held together: cells expressing the tetrameric Lac repressor still arrest in response to microtubule-depolymerizing drugs. Tethering chromatids together does not disrupt kinetochore function; chromosomes are successfully segregated to opposite poles of the spindle. Our results indicate that the spindle checkpoint does not monitor inter-kinetochore separation, thus supporting the hypothesis that tension is measured within the kinetochore.

[1]  A. Murray,et al.  Localization of Mad2 to Kinetochores Depends on Microtubule Attachment, Not Tension , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[2]  K Nasmyth,et al.  Destruction of the CDC28/CLB mitotic kinase is not required for the metaphase to anaphase transition in budding yeast. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[3]  E. Salmon,et al.  Welcome to a new kind of tension: translating kinetochore mechanics into a wait-anaphase signal , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[4]  A. Murray,et al.  Lack of tension at kinetochores activates the spindle checkpoint in budding yeast , 2001, Current Biology.

[5]  J. Miller,et al.  Genetic studies of the lac repressor. V. Repressors which bind operator more tightly generated by suppression and reversion of nonsense mutations. , 1978, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  Tomoyuki U. Tanaka Bi-orienting chromosomes: acrobatics on the mitotic spindle , 2008, Chromosoma.

[7]  K. Oegema,et al.  A Bir1-Sli15 Complex Connects Centromeres to Microtubules and Is Required to Sense Kinetochore Tension , 2006, Cell.

[8]  K. Bloom,et al.  Genetic manipulation of centromere function , 1987, Molecular and cellular biology.

[9]  E. Nogales,et al.  Architecture and flexibility of the yeast Ndc80 kinetochore complex. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  Andrew W. Murray,et al.  Recruiting a microtubule-binding complex to DNA directs chromosome segregation in budding yeast , 2009, Nature Cell Biology.

[11]  K. Nasmyth,et al.  Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora Kinase-INCENP) Complex Promotes Chromosome Bi-orientation by Altering Kinetochore-Spindle Pole Connections , 2002, Cell.

[12]  Geert J. P. L. Kops,et al.  On the road to cancer: aneuploidy and the mitotic checkpoint , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[13]  B. Roberts,et al.  S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function , 1991, Cell.

[14]  Andrew W. Murray,et al.  GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein–protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion , 1996, Current Biology.

[15]  T. Hori,et al.  Spindle microtubules generate tension-dependent changes in the distribution of inner kinetochore proteins , 2011, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  A. Desai,et al.  Tension Sensing by Aurora B Kinase is Independent of Survivin-Based Centromere Localization , 2013, Nature.

[17]  A. Murray,et al.  The budding yeast protein kinase Ipl1/Aurora allows the absence of tension to activate the spindle checkpoint. , 2001, Genes & development.

[18]  E. Salmon,et al.  Intrakinetochore stretch is associated with changes in kinetochore phosphorylation and spindle assembly checkpoint activity , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[19]  M. Lampson,et al.  Sensing Chromosome Bi-Orientation by Spatial Separation of Aurora B Kinase from Kinetochore Substrates , 2009, Science.

[20]  A. Murray,et al.  Budding Yeast Mitotic Chromosomes Have an Intrinsic Bias to Biorient on the Spindle , 2007, Current Biology.

[21]  K. Nasmyth,et al.  Cohesin ensures bipolar attachment of microtubules to sister centromeres and resists their precocious separation , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[22]  A Khodjakov,et al.  The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[23]  K. Takagaki,et al.  Kinetochore stretching inactivates the spindle assembly checkpoint , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  Andrew W. Murray,et al.  Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast , 1991, Cell.

[25]  S. Biggins,et al.  The Ipl1-Aurora protein kinase activates the spindle checkpoint by creating unattached kinetochores , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[26]  Bruce F. McEwen,et al.  Protein Architecture of the Human Kinetochore Microtubule Attachment Site , 2009, Cell.

[27]  Peter K. Sorger,et al.  Transient Sister Chromatid Separation and Elastic Deformation of Chromosomes during Mitosis in Budding Yeast , 2000, Cell.

[28]  Kozo Tanaka Dynamic regulation of kinetochore-microtubule interaction during mitosis. , 2012, Journal of biochemistry.

[29]  R. Nicklas,et al.  Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint , 1995, Nature.

[30]  Stefan Westermann,et al.  Structures and functions of yeast kinetochore complexes. , 2007, Annual review of biochemistry.

[31]  W. Earnshaw,et al.  The chromosomal passenger complex (CPC): from easy rider to the godfather of mitosis , 2012, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[32]  G. Goshima,et al.  Establishing Biorientation Occurs with Precocious Separation of the Sister Kinetochores, but Not the Arms, in the Early Spindle of Budding Yeast , 2000, Cell.

[33]  S. Biggins,et al.  An Mtw1 complex promotes kinetochore biorientation that is monitored by the Ipl1/Aurora protein kinase. , 2003, Developmental cell.

[34]  A. Murray,et al.  The Centromeric Protein Sgo1 Is Required to Sense Lack of Tension on Mitotic Chromosomes , 2005, Science.

[35]  K. Hofmann,et al.  PICH, a Centromere-Associated SNF2 Family ATPase, Is Regulated by Plk1 and Required for the Spindle Checkpoint , 2007, Cell.

[36]  M. Speicher,et al.  Persistence of DNA threads in human anaphase cells suggests late completion of sister chromatid decatenation , 2007, Chromosoma.

[37]  A. Amon,et al.  New insights into the troubles of aneuploidy. , 2012, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[38]  Andrew W. Murray,et al.  Association of Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Component XMAD2 with Unattached Kinetochores , 1996, Science.

[39]  A. Murray,et al.  The spindle checkpoint rescues the meiotic segregation of chromosomes whose crossovers are far from the centromere , 2007, Nature Genetics.