The impact of a congestion pricing exemption on the demand for new energy efficient vehicles in Stockholm

As governments seek to transition to more efficient vehicle fleets, one strategy has been to incentivize ‘green’ vehicle choice by exempting some of these vehicles from road user charges. As an example, to stimulate sales of Energy-Efficient Vehicles (EEVs) in Sweden, some of these automobiles were exempted from Stockholm’s congestion tax. In this paper the effect this policy had on the demand for new, privately-owned, exempt EEVs is assessed by first estimating a model of vehicle choice and then by applying this model to simulate vehicle alternative market shares under different policy scenarios. The database used to calibrate the model includes owner-specific demographics merged with vehicle registry data for all new private vehicles registered in Stockholm County during 2008. Characteristics of individuals with a higher propensity to purchase an exempt EEV were identified. The most significant factors included intra-cordon residency (positive), distance from home to the CBD (negative), and commuting across the cordon (positive). By calculating vehicle shares from the vehicle choice model and then comparing these estimates to a simulated scenario where the congestion tax exemption was inactive, the exemption was estimated to have substantially increased the share of newly purchased, private, exempt EEVs in Stockholm by 1.8% (+/- 0.3%; 95% C.I.) to a total share of 18.8%. This amounts to an estimated 10.7% increase in private, exempt EEV purchases during 2008 i.e. 519 privately owned, exempt EEVs.

[1]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  The Impact of Demographics, Built Environment Attributes, Vehicle Characteristics, and Gasoline Prices on Household Vehicle Holdings and Use , 2009 .

[2]  R. H. Thring,et al.  Identifying the Early Adopters of Alternative Fuel Vehicles: A Case Study of Birmingham, United Kingdom , 2012 .

[3]  J. P. Toner,et al.  A mixed logit model of U.K. household demand for alternative-fuel vehicles. , 2004 .

[4]  Andreas R. Ziegler,et al.  Individual Characteristics and Stated Preferences for Alternative Energy Sources and Propulsion Technologies in Vehicles: A Discrete Choice Analysis , 2010 .

[5]  G. Ewing,et al.  Car fuel-type choice under travel demand management and economic incentives , 1998 .

[6]  Wsp Analysis The Stockholm Congestion Charges——5 Years on Effects,Acceptability and Lessons Learnt , 2012 .

[7]  John K. Dagsvik,et al.  Potential demand for alternative fuel vehicles , 2002 .

[8]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Evolution of the household vehicle fleet: Anticipating fleet composition, PHEV adoption and GHG emissions in Austin, Texas , 2011 .

[9]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  Demand for clean-fuel vehicles in California: A discrete-choice stated preference pilot project , 1993 .

[10]  Caroline L. Noblet,et al.  Effective environmental marketing of green cars: A nested-logit approach , 2012 .

[11]  S. Washington,et al.  Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis , 2010 .

[12]  D. Hensher,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions and australian commuters’ attitudes and behavior concerning abatement policies and personal involvement , 1997 .

[13]  Xing Liu,et al.  Green cars sterilize congestion charges: A model analysis of the reduced impact of Stockholm road tolls , 2012 .

[14]  Roger Pyddoke Empirical Analyses of Car Ownership and Car use in Sweden , 2009 .

[15]  Matthew E. Kahn Do greens drive Hummers or hybrids? Environmental ideology as a determinant of consumer choice , 2007 .

[16]  Bradley Flamm,et al.  The impacts of environmental knowledge and attitudes on vehicle ownership and use , 2009 .

[17]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  What type of vehicle do people drive? The role of attitude and lifestyle in influencing vehicle type choice - eScholarship , 2004 .

[18]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: Have They Changed Over Time?1 , 2010 .

[19]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Consumer Preferences for Alternative Fuel Vehicles: A Discrete Choice Analysis , 2012 .

[20]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models , 2003 .

[21]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[22]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  How much do incentives affect car purchase? Agent-based microsimulation of consumer choice of new cars—Part II: Forecasting effects of feebates based on energy-efficiency , 2009 .

[23]  K. S. Gallagher,et al.  Giving Green to Get Green: Incentives and Consumer Adoption of Hybrid Vehicle Technology , 2008 .

[24]  Simon Washington,et al.  Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2010 .

[25]  Stephane Hess,et al.  A joint model for vehicle type and fuel type choice: evidence from a cross-nested logit study , 2012 .

[26]  Charles Abraham,et al.  Mainstream consumers driving plug-in battery-electric and plug-in hybrid electric cars: A qualitative analysis of responses and evaluations , 2012 .

[27]  Stefan Lindhard Mabit,et al.  Demand for alternative-fuel vehicles when registration taxes are high , 2011 .

[28]  John M. Rose,et al.  Environmental attitudes and emissions charging: An example of policy implications for vehicle choice , 2013 .

[29]  Thomas F. Golob,et al.  A Transactions Choice Model for Forecasting Demand for Alternative-Fuel Vehicles , 1996 .

[30]  Florian Heiss,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .