The Optimization of Online Searches Through the Labelling of a Dynamic, Situation-Dependent Information Need: the Reference Interview and Online Searching for Undergraduates Doing a Social-Science Assignment

An important user group in academic libraries is the undergraduate student seeking information for coursework in the social sciences. With the proliferation of electronic databases, a major challenge for reference librarians is to conduct a quick and effective reference interview to determine the undergraduate's information need while also providing instruction on using the information system. The present article proposes a reference-interview strategy that will allow the reference librarian to (1) efficiently assess the information need of the undergraduate, (2) label the information need, and (3) assign the most appropriate search strategy to satisfy this need.

[1]  S. P. Harter.  Psychological relevance and information science , 1992 .

[2]  Lucy A. Tedd.  The Changing Face of CD-ROM , 1995, J. Documentation.

[3]  Reijo Savolainen,et al.  The Sense-Making Theory: Reviewing the Interests of a User-Centred Approach to Information Seeking and Use , 1993, Inf. Process. Manag..

[4]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Term Relevance Feedback and Mediated Database Searching: Implications for Information Retrieval Practice and Systems Design , 1995, Inf. Process. Manag..

[5]  Michael B. Eisenberg,et al.  A re-examination of relevance: toward a dynamic, situational definition , 1990, Inf. Process. Manag..

[6]  Steve Smithson,et al.  Information Retrieval Evaluation in Practice: A Case Study Approach , 1994, Inf. Process. Manag..

[7]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  Information technology and information use: towards a unified view of information and information technology , 1986 .

[8]  B. Dervin,et al.  Information needs and uses. , 1986 .

[9]  Linda C. Smith,et al.  Reference and information services : an introduction , 1995 .

[10]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau,et al.  Validating a Model of the Search Process: A Comparison of Academic, Public and School Library Users. , 1990 .

[11]  Paul B. Kantor,et al.  A study of information seeking and retrieving. II. Users, questions, and effectiveness , 1988 .

[12]  Brenda Dervin,et al.  From the mind’s eye of the user: The sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology. , 1992 .

[13]  B. Dervin,et al.  Neutral Questioning: A New Approach to the Reference Interview. , 1986 .

[14]  Barbara Fister,et al.  The Research Processes of Undergraduate Students. , 1992 .

[15]  Joan C. Durrance.  Factors That Influence Reference Success: What Makes Questioners Willing to Return? , 1995 .

[16]  S. D. Neill,et al.  The Reference Process and Certain Types of Memory: Semantic, Episodic, and Schematic. , 1984 .

[17]  C. Cleverdon.  On the Inverse Relationship of Recall and Precision. , 1972 .

[18]  Patricia Helen Dewdney.  The Effects Of Training Reference Librarians In Interview Skills: A Field Experiment , 1986 .

[19]  Isola Ajiferuke,et al.  A total relevance and document interaction effects model for the evaluation of information retrieval processes , 1988, Inf. Process. Manag..

[20]  John V. Richardson.  Knowledge-based systems for general reference work , 1995 .

[21]  Robert S. Taylor.  The process of asking questions , 1962 .

[22]  Jack D. Glazier,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Management , 1992 .

[23]  Peter J. Vigil,et al.  Online Retrieval: Analysis and Strategy , 1988 .

[24]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau,et al.  Seeking Meaning: a process approach to library and information services" Ablex Publishing , 2003 .

[25]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  The cognitive viewpoint in information science , 1990, J. Inf. Sci..

[26]  Ethel Auster,et al.  Search interview techniques and information gain as antecedents of user satisfaction with online bibliographic retrieval , 1984, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[27]  Stephen E. Wiberley,et al.  Users' persistence in scanning lists of references , 1988 .

[28]  Fredric C. Gey,et al.  The relationship between recall and precision , 1994 .

[29]  Paul B. Kantor,et al.  A Study of Information Seeking and Retrieving. III. Searchers, Searches, and Overlap* , 1988 .

[30]  Paul B. Kantor,et al.  A study of information seeking and retrieving. I. background and methodology , 1988 .

[31]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau.  Inside the Search Process: Information Seeking from the User's Perspective. , 1991 .

[32]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Interaction in information systems : a review of research from document retrieval to knowledge-based systems , 1985 .

[33]  C. Kuhlthau.  Developing a Model of the Library Search Process: Cognitive and Affective Aspects. , 1988 .

[34]  Karen Markey,et al.  Levels of question formulation in negotiation of information need during the online presearch interview: A proposed model , 1981, Inf. Process. Manag..

[35]  Domenica M. Barbuto,et al.  The Delivery of Reference Services in a CD-ROM LAN Environment: A Case Study. , 1994 .

[36]  M. Kinnucan.  The size of retrieval sets , 1992 .

[37]  D. Ellis.  Modeling the Information-Seeking Patterns of Academic Researchers: A Grounded Theory Approach , 1993, The Library Quarterly.

[38]  Robert S. Taylor,et al.  Problem dimensions and information traits , 1984, Inf. Soc..

[39]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  User requirements—empirical research and information systems design , 1986 .

[40]  F. W. Lancaster.  Searching Databases on CD-ROM: Comparison of the Results of End-User Searching with Results from Two Modes of Searching by Skilled Intermediaries. , 1994 .