Journal of Systems and Information Technology Information technology evaluation : issues and challenges

Purpose – To justify an increase in information technology (IT) spending and to understand utilization of limited organizational resources on IT, the correlation between IT and business performance has been of great interest to business managers. However, business managers face issues and challenges in finding out how and to what extent IT is able to deliver the intended benefits. The purpose of this paper is to examine IT evaluation issues and challenges faced by information systems (IS) researchers, IS specialists, and business managers. Design/methodology/approach – This paper begins by reviewing the disparate discussions in past literature on IT evaluation issues and challenges. It then provides a synthesis of the disparate discussions by identifying eight issues and challenges in IT evaluation. Findings – The eight issues and challenges identified are: evaluation scope, evaluation timing, unit of analysis, level of analysis, different perspectives, different dimensions, different measures, and underpinning theoretical frameworks. It concludes with some suggestions on ways to improve IT evaluation practices. Originality/value – This paper posits that before a pragmatic IT evaluation approach can be developed, it is necessary to first understand the issues and challenges faced by IS researchers, IS specialists, and business managers in IT evaluation. Having identified the eight issues and challenges, this paper provides pointers on what needs to be considered when conducting IT evaluation.

[1]  Peter Weill,et al.  Managing Investment in Information Technology: Mini Case Examples and Implications , 1989, MIS Q..

[2]  Neil F. Doherty,et al.  The stakeholder dimension in information systems evaluation , 2002, J. Inf. Technol..

[3]  Michael Sherwood-Smith,et al.  Maximise information systems value by continuous participative evaluation , 1999 .

[4]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Measuring organizational IS effectiveness: an overview and update of senior management perspectives , 2002, DATB.

[5]  Randolph B. Cooper,et al.  Implications of the competing values framework for management information systems , 1993 .

[6]  Ram L. Kumar,et al.  A Framework for Assessing the Business Value of Information Technology Infrastructures , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Dimensions of Information Systems Success , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Bonnie P. Stivers,et al.  Building a Balanced Performance Management System , 2000 .

[9]  Gary Klein,et al.  Information system evaluation by system typology , 1997, J. Syst. Softw..

[10]  Varun Grover,et al.  Business Value of IT: An Essay on Expanding Research Directions to Keep up with the Times , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Discovering Potential and Realizing Value from Information Technology Investments , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Frank F. Land,et al.  Evaluating investments in IT , 1992, J. Inf. Technol..

[13]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Information Technology and Productivity: A Review of the Literature , 1996, Adv. Comput..

[14]  Kai R. T. Larsen,et al.  A Taxonomy of Antecedents of Information Systems Success: Variable Analysis Studies , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Roger Flanagan,et al.  Measuring the costs and benefits of information technology in construction , 2000 .

[16]  Egon Berghout,et al.  Methodologies for information systems investment evaluation at the proposal stage: a comparative review , 1997, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[17]  Zahir Irani,et al.  The Propagation of Technology Management Taxonomies for Evaluating Investments in Information Systems , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Hannu Kivijärvi,et al.  Evaluating strategic IT investments: an assessment of investment alternatives for a web content management system , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[19]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Evaluating IT/IS investments: A fuzzy multi-criteria decision model approach , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Choon Seong Leem,et al.  An integrated evaluation system based on the continuous improvement model of IS performance , 2004, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[21]  A. Lederer,et al.  An Instrument for Assessing the Organizational Benefits of IS Projects , 1998 .

[22]  Vijayan Sugumaran,et al.  Measuring it Performance: “Contingency” Variables and Value Modes , 2004, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Evaluating information systems projects: a multidimensional approach , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[24]  Varun Grover,et al.  The relationship between organizational characteristics and information system structure: An international survey , 1996 .

[25]  Scott Hamilton,et al.  Evaluating Information Systems Effectiveness - Part II: Comparing Evaluator Viewpoints , 1981, MIS Q..

[26]  Chanchai Tangpong IT-Performance Paradox Revisited: Resource-Based and Prisoner's Dilemma Perspective , 2008 .

[27]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance , 2000 .

[28]  Ian Richardson,et al.  Diagnosing information systems success: importance-performance maps in the health club industry , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[29]  Yolande E. Chan IT Value: The Great Divide Between Qualitative and Quantitative and Individual and Organizational Measures , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Edward Bernroider,et al.  IT governance for enterprise resource planning supported by the DeLone-McLean model of information systems success , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[31]  L. Willcocks,et al.  Beyond the It Productivity Paradox , 1999 .

[32]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Evaluating cost taxonomies for information systems management , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Edmond P. Fitzgerald,et al.  Understanding “IS business value”: derivation of dimensions , 1999 .

[34]  Adolph I. Katz MEASURING TECHNOLOGY’S BUSINESS VALUE: Organizations Seek to Prove IT Benefits , 1993 .

[35]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value , 1996, MIS Q..

[36]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Researching the investment of information technology in construction: An examination of evaluation practices , 2005 .

[37]  George Philip,et al.  An empirical study of the use of EDI in supermarket chains using a new conceptual framework , 1999, J. Inf. Technol..

[38]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[39]  Hafid Agourram,et al.  Defining information system success in Germany , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[40]  Prashant Palvia,et al.  The PRISM system: a key to organizational effectiveness at Federal Express Corporation , 1992 .

[41]  Anastasia Papazafeiropoulou,et al.  Investigating evaluation frameworks for health information systems , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[42]  Joan Ballantine,et al.  Performance measurement in service businesses revisited , 1996 .

[43]  M. Peters,et al.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN SUPPORTING THE EXTENDED SUPPLY CHAIN , 2001 .

[44]  Elske Ammenwerth,et al.  Evaluation of health information systems - problems and challenges , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[45]  Shailendra C. Palvia,et al.  A socio-technical framework for quality assessment of computer information systems , 2001, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[46]  Jaak Jurison,et al.  The temporal nature of IS benefits: A longitudinal study , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[47]  Olli-Pekka Hilmola,et al.  ERP evaluation during the shakedown phase: lessons from an after‐sales division , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[48]  Deepinder S. Bajwa,et al.  Key antecedents of Executive Information System success: a path analytic approach , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[49]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Applying concepts of fuzzy cognitive mapping to model: The IT/IS investment evaluation process , 2002 .

[50]  Arun Rai,et al.  Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[51]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[52]  Peter Weill,et al.  The Relationship Between Investment in Information Technology and Firm Performance: A Study of the Valve Manufacturing Sector , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[53]  Sreenivasan Jayashree,et al.  Government to E-government to E-society , 2010 .

[54]  Steve Smithson,et al.  The management of change for information systems evaluation practice: Experience from a case study , 1996 .

[55]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Propagation of a parsimonious framework for evaluating information systems in construction , 2006 .

[56]  D. Remenyi,et al.  The Societal Value of ICT : First Steps Towards an Evaluation Framework , 2003 .

[57]  Andrew P. McAfee THE IMPACT OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION ON OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION , 2002 .

[58]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Information systems effectiveness: The construct space and patters of application , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[59]  Joan A. Ballantine,et al.  Financial appraisal and the IS/IT investment decision making process , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..

[60]  H. Wen,et al.  Evaluation of information technology investment , 1999 .

[61]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Information Technology Payoff in the Health-Care Industry: A Longitudinal Study , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[62]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Information technology evaluation: classifying indirect costs using the structured case method , 2004, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[63]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Exploring the measurement of end user computing success , 1999 .

[64]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Information technology and systems justification: A review for research and applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[65]  Shivraj Kanungo,et al.  A structured model for evaluating information systems effectiveness , 1999 .

[66]  Soung Hie Kim,et al.  A Lag Effect of IT Investment on Firm Performance , 2006, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[67]  Mairead Brady,et al.  The impact of IT on marketing: an evaluation , 1999 .

[68]  Craig Standing,et al.  An interpretive approach to evaluating information systems: A content, context, process framework , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[69]  William J. Doll,et al.  Developing a multidimensional measure of system-use in an organizational context , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[70]  Egon Berghout,et al.  The eleven years of European Conference on IT evaluation: Retrospectives and perspectives for possible future research , 2005 .

[71]  Tony Cornford,et al.  A critical approach to evaluation , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[72]  Mo Adam Mahmood,et al.  Measuring the Organizational Impact of Information Technology Investment: An Exploratory Study , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[73]  Sunder Kekre,et al.  Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange , 1995, MIS Q..

[74]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Information systems evaluation: navigating through the problem domain , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[75]  Judy E. Scott The measurement of information systems effectiveness: evaluating a measuring instrument , 1995, DATB.

[76]  Scott Hamilton,et al.  Evaluating Information Systems Effectiveness - Part I: Comparing Evaluation Approaches , 1981, MIS Q..

[77]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[78]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The Usefulness of Computer-Based Information to Public Managers , 1993, MIS Q..

[79]  Chee-Sing Yap,et al.  Information Systems Effectiveness: A User Satisfaction Approach , 1996, Inf. Process. Manag..

[80]  Eric W. T. Ngai,et al.  IT Business Value Research: A Critical Review and Research Agenda , 2005, Int. J. Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[81]  William R. King,et al.  An Empirical Assessment of Information Systems Planning and the Role of Information Systems in Organizations , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[82]  Niv Ahituv,et al.  The benefits of using information systems , 2000, CACM.

[83]  FRANK BANNISTER,et al.  Acts of faith: instinct, value and IT investment decisions , 2000, J. Inf. Technol..

[84]  Z. Irani,et al.  Integrating the costs of a manufacturing IT/IS infrastructure into the investment decision-making process , 1997 .

[85]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link? , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[86]  S. Moss,et al.  Comparing IT success in manufacturing and service industries , 2001 .

[87]  Tridas Mukhopadhyay,et al.  A Microeconomic Production Assessment of the Business Value of Management Information Systems: The Case of Inventory Control , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[88]  Dan Remenyi,et al.  Management of information technology evaluation ‐ the development of a managerial thesis , 1999 .

[89]  Göran Goldkuhl,et al.  Strategies for Information Systems Evaluation : Six Generic Types , 2003 .

[90]  Subhasish Dasgupta,et al.  Influence of information technology investment on firm productivity: a cross‐sectional study , 1999 .

[91]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems failures—a survey and classification of the empirical literature , 1988 .

[92]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Service Quality: A Measure of Information System Effectiveness , 1995, MIS Q..

[93]  L ChervanyNorman,et al.  Evaluating information systems effectiveness - part ii: , 1981 .

[94]  Darshana Sedera,et al.  Re-conceptualizing Information System Success: The IS-Impact Measurement Model , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[95]  Effy Oz,et al.  Information technology productivity: in search of a definite observation , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[96]  Charles H. Kriebel,et al.  Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[97]  Benita M. Beamon,et al.  Measuring supply chain performance , 1999 .

[98]  Marc J. Schniederjans,et al.  A new strategic information technology investment model , 2003 .