Exploration and Exploitation in the Presence of Network Externalities

This paper examines the conditions under which exploration of a new, incompatible technologyis conducive to firm growth in the presence of network externalities. In particular, this study is motivated by the divergent evolutions of the PC and the workstation markets in response to a new technology: reduced instruction set computing (RISC). In the PC market, Intel has developed new microprocessors by maintaining compatibility with the established architecture, whereas it was radically replaced by RISC in the workstation market. History indicates that unlike the PC market, the workstation market consisted of a large number of power users, who are less sensitive to compatibility than ordinary users. Our numerical analysis indicates that the exploration of a new, incompatible technology is more likely to increase the chance of firm growth when there are a substantial number of power users or when a new technology is introduced before an established technology takes off.

[1]  Stan J. Liebowitz,et al.  The Fable of the Keys , 1990, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[2]  S. Liebowitz,et al.  Path Dependence, Lock-In, and History , 1995 .

[3]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[4]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Path Creation as a Process of Mindful Deviation , 2013 .

[5]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Continuous Univariate Distributions. , 1995 .

[6]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[7]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[8]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[9]  Geoffrey A. Moore,et al.  Inside the Tornado: Marketing Strategies from Silicon Valley's Cutting Edge , 1995 .

[10]  Geoffrey A. Moore.  Crossing the chasm : marketing and selling high-tech products to mainstream customers , 1999 .

[11]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  Intel Corporation: 1968-1997 , 1997 .

[12]  P. David,et al.  The economics of gateway technology and network evolution: lessons from electricity supply history , 1988 .

[13]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[14]  Eirik Gaard Kristiansen,et al.  R&D in the Presence of Network Externalities: Timing and Compatibility , 1998 .

[15]  S. Mezias,et al.  MANAGING DISCONTINUOUS CHANGE: A SIMULATION STUDY OF ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP , 1990 .

[16]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy , 1996 .

[17]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[18]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Rigid Disk Drive Industry: A History of Commercial and Technological Turbulence , 1993, Business History Review.

[19]  S. Mezias,et al.  The three faces of corporate renewal: institution, revolution, and evolution , 1993 .

[20]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Forces Generating and Limiting Concentration under Schumpeterian Competition , 1978 .

[21]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[22]  S. Mezias,et al.  An Organizational Learning Model of Convergence and Reorientation , 1992 .

[23]  W. Arthur,et al.  Complexity and the economy , 2014, Science.

[24]  David C. Mowery,et al.  International Computer Software Industry , 1995 .

[25]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  Simulation of Schumpeterian Competition , 1977 .

[26]  D. North.  Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[27]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  A model of adaptive organizational search , 1981 .

[28]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Systems Competition and Network Effects , 1994 .

[29]  John Steffens,et al.  Newgames: Strategic Competition in the PC Revolution , 1993 .

[30]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Installed base and compatibility : innovation, product preannouncements and predation , 1986 .

[31]  Dan Boneh,et al.  On genetic algorithms , 1995, COLT '95.

[32]  Linda Argote,et al.  Organizational Learning Curves: A Method for Investigating Intra-Plant Transfer of Knowledge Acquired Through Learning by Doing , 1991 .

[33]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[34]  E. Johnsen.  Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[35]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change , 1994 .

[36]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[37]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Product Introduction with Network Externalities , 1992 .

[38]  永福 智志.  The Organization of Learning , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  Mary Tripsas.  UNRAVELING THE PROCESS OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION: COMPLEMENTARY ASSETS AND INCUMBENT SURVIVAL IN THE TYPESETTER INDUSTRY: UNRAVELING THE PROCESS OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION , 1997 .

[40]  David B. Yoffie.  Strategic management in information technology , 1993 .

[41]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[42]  Sidney G. Winter,et al.  Satisficing, Selection, and the Innovating Remnant , 1971 .

[43]  L. Argote,et al.  Learning Curves in Manufacturing , 1990, Science.

[44]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[45]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[46]  Young U. Ryu,et al.  Exploration, exploitation and adaptive rationality: the neo-Schumpeterian perspective , 2002, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.