Statistical analysis of the inter-individual variations of the bone shape, volume fraction and fabric and their correlations in the proximal femur.

Including structural information of trabecular bone improves the prediction of bone strength and fracture risk. However, this information is available in clinical CT scans, only for peripheral bones. We hypothesized that a correlation exists between the shape of the bone, its volume fraction (BV/TV) and fabric, which could be characterized using statistical modeling. High-resolution peripheral computed tomography (HR-pQCT) images of 73 proximal femurs were used to build a combined statistical model of shape, BV/TV and fabric. The model was based on correspondence established by image registration and by morphing of a finite element mesh describing the spatial distribution of the bone properties. Results showed no correlation between the distribution of bone shape, BV/TV and fabric. Only the first mode of variation associated with density and orientation showed a strong relationship (R2>0.8). In addition, the model showed that the anisotropic information of the proximal femur does not vary significantly in a population of healthy, osteoporotic and osteopenic samples. In our dataset, the average anisotropy of the population was able to provide a close approximation of the patient-specific anisotropy. These results were confirmed by homogenized finite element (hFE) analyses, which showed that the biomechanical behavior of the proximal femur was not significantly different when the average anisotropic information of the population was used instead of patient-specific fabric extracted from HR-pQCT. Based on these findings, it can be assumed that the fabric information of the proximal femur follows a similar structure in an elderly population of healthy, osteopenic and osteoporotic proximal femurs.

[1]  Z. Yosibash,et al.  Patient-specific Finite-element Analyses of the Proximal Femur with Orthotropic Material Properties Validated , 2022 .

[2]  E. Dall’Ara,et al.  Orthotropic HR-pQCT-based FE models improve strength predictions for stance but not for side-way fall loading compared to isotropic QCT-based FE models of human femurs. , 2014, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[3]  A. A. Zadpoor,et al.  Statistical shape and appearance models of bones. , 2014, Bone.

[4]  Y. Won,et al.  Age-and region-dependent changes in three-dimensional microstructural properties of proximal femoral trabeculae , 2008, Osteoporosis International.

[5]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[6]  T San Antonio,et al.  Orientation of orthotropic material properties in a femur FE model: a method based on the principal stresses directions. , 2012, Medical engineering & physics.

[7]  F. Taddei,et al.  A novel approach to estimate trabecular bone anisotropy using a database approach. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Bert Van Rietbergen,et al.  Finite Element Analysis Based on In Vivo HR‐pQCT Images of the Distal Radius Is Associated With Wrist Fracture in Postmenopausal Women , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[9]  J. Johnston,et al.  Quantifying trabecular bone material anisotropy and orientation using low resolution clinical CT images: A feasibility study. , 2016, Medical engineering & physics.

[10]  X. Guo,et al.  Skeletal Structure in Postmenopausal Women With Osteopenia and Fractures Is Characterized by Abnormal Trabecular Plates and Cortical Thinning , 2014, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[11]  Mauricio Reyes,et al.  Biomechanical Role of Bone Anisotropy Estimated on Clinical CT Scans by Image Registration , 2016, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Keita Ito,et al.  Inter-individual variability of bone density and morphology distribution in the proximal femur and T12 vertebra. , 2014, Bone.

[13]  Dieter H. Pahr,et al.  From high-resolution CT data to finite element models: development of an integrated modular framework , 2009 .

[14]  Brent C Taylor,et al.  Risk Factors for Hip Fracture in Older Men: The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS) , 2016, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[15]  Keita Ito,et al.  A novel approach to estimate trabecular bone anisotropy from stress tensors , 2015, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[16]  R. L. Mason,et al.  Fracture Risk Predictions Based on Statistical Shape and Density Modeling of the Proximal Femur , 2015 .

[17]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  The quality of trabecular bone evaluated with micro-computed tomography, FEA and mechanical testing. , 1997, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[18]  H Weinans,et al.  Cancellous bone mechanical properties from normals and patients with hip fractures differ on the structure level, not on the bone hard tissue level. , 2002, Bone.

[19]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Statistical estimation of femur micro-architecture using optimal shape and density predictors. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  P. Zysset,et al.  Not only stiffness, but also yield strength of the trabecular structure determined by non-linear µFE is best predicted by bone volume fraction and fabric tensor. , 2017, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[21]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  Direct Three‐Dimensional Morphometric Analysis of Human Cancellous Bone: Microstructural Data from Spine, Femur, Iliac Crest, and Calcaneus , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[22]  Mauricio Reyes,et al.  Image-based vs. mesh-based statistical appearance models of the human femur: implications for finite element simulations. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[23]  Mauricio Reyes,et al.  Prediction of Trabecular Bone Anisotropy from Quantitative Computed Tomography Using Supervised Learning and a Novel Morphometric Feature Descriptor , 2015, MICCAI.

[24]  C Kober,et al.  Consideration of anisotropic elasticity minimizes volumetric rather than shear deformation in human mandible , 2006, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[25]  N. Ayache,et al.  Log‐Euclidean metrics for fast and simple calculus on diffusion tensors , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Variations in Three‐Dimensional Cancellous Bone Architecture of the Proximal Femur in Female Hip Fractures and in Controls , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[27]  Christian Hellmich,et al.  MICROMECHANICS-BASED CONVERSION OF CT DATA INTO ANISOTROPIC ELASTICITY TENSORS, APPLIED TO FE SIMULATIONS OF A MANDIBLE , 2008 .

[28]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  elastix: A Toolbox for Intensity-Based Medical Image Registration , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  R. L. Mason,et al.  Fracture Risk Predictions Based on Statistical Shape and Density Modeling of the Proximal Femur , 2014, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[30]  Nils Reimers,et al.  Optimisation of orthopaedic implant design using statistical shape space analysis based on level sets , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[31]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Association of Geometric Factors and Failure Load Level With the Distribution of Cervical vs. Trochanteric Hip Fractures , 2006, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[32]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[33]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Riemannian geometry for the statistical analysis of diffusion tensor data , 2007, Signal Process..

[34]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Comprehensive evaluation of PCA-based finite element modelling of the human femur. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[35]  F. Kainberger,et al.  A nonlinear QCT-based finite element model validation study for the human femur tested in two configurations in vitro. , 2013, Bone.

[36]  P. Zysset,et al.  Bone Volume Fraction and Fabric Anisotropy Are Better Determinants of Trabecular Bone Stiffness Than Other Morphological Variables , 2015, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[37]  Enrico Dall'Ara,et al.  Clinical versus pre-clinical FE models for vertebral body strength predictions. , 2014, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[38]  Nazli Sarkalkan,et al.  Statistical shape and appearance models for fast and automated estimation of proximal femur fracture load using 2D finite element models. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  Karol Miller,et al.  Computational Biomechanics for Patient-Specific Applications , 2015, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.