Towards a theory of SocioCitizenry: Quality anticipation, trust configuration, and approved adaptation of governmental social media

Abstract The past few years have witnessed growing governmental interest in engaging citizens through social media. With this interest comes a genuine need to understand the process and outcomes of government–citizen interactions. Therefore, this article seeks to address this important issue by proposing and validating a SocioCitizenry theory that depicts government–citizen interaction through social media. The present study uses data gathered through two field surveys and analyses the relationships among three main SocioCitizenry constructs: quality anticipation, trust configuration, and approved adaptation. The following factors are examined with respect to the aforementioned three constructs: differential influences of familiarity with social media and government services; perceived importance of interactions with government services; social media quality reputation; and family members’ and friends’ perceptions of social media quality. Overall, results show that anticipated governmental social media quality influences configured trust, which in turn influences the extent of approved adaptation. The implications of these results in research and practice are discussed.

[1]  Ines Mergel,et al.  A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[2]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Technology use , 1990 .

[3]  Tomasz Janowski,et al.  Electronic Governance for Sustainable Development - Conceptual framework and state of research , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[5]  Nathalie Hyde-Clarke,et al.  The use of Facebook for political commentary in South Africa , 2014, Telematics Informatics.

[6]  Morad Benyoucef,et al.  Managing an organisation's social media presence: An empirical stages of growth model , 2017, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[7]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Use of Social Media in Citizen-Centric Electronic Government Services: A Literature Analysis , 2017, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[8]  Caroline Chan,et al.  Sharing Political Content in Online Social Media: A Planned and Unplanned Behaviour Approach , 2018, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[9]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE DIMENSIONALITY OF THE CONCEPT OF INFORMATION , 1978 .

[10]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding and Mitigating Uncertainty in Online Exchange Relationships: A Principal-Agent Perspective , 2007, MIS Q..

[11]  Adel M. Aladwani Corruption as a source of e-Government projects failure in developing countries: A theoretical exposition , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[12]  Mayumi Miyata Measuring impacts of e-government support in least developed countries: a case study of the vehicle registration service in Bhutan , 2011, Inf. Technol. Dev..

[13]  Mun Y. Yi,et al.  Untangling the antecedents of initial trust in Web-based health information: The roles of argument quality, source expertise, and user perceptions of information quality and risk , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[14]  D. Norman The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition , 2013 .

[15]  Tino Schuppan,et al.  E-Government in developing countries: Experiences from sub-Saharan Africa , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[16]  Prashant C. Palvia,et al.  Developing and validating an instrument for measuring user-perceived web quality , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[17]  Gert-Jan de Vreede,et al.  Understanding trust influencing factors in social media communication: A qualitative study , 2017, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[18]  Jonathan W. Palmer,et al.  Web Site Usability, Design, and Performance Metrics , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Allegra Gonzalez,et al.  Digital citizenship: The Internet, society, and participation , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  Deborah Agostino,et al.  Using social media to engage citizens: A study of Italian municipalities , 2013 .

[21]  D. Gefen,et al.  E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust , 2000 .

[22]  Laurence Brooks,et al.  The Assessment of Credibility of e-Government: Users' Perspective , 2009, HCI.

[23]  Adel M. Aladwani Facilitators, characteristics, and impacts of Twitter use: Theoretical analysis and empirical illustration , 2015, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[24]  Madeline E. Heilman,et al.  Threats and Promises: Reputational Consequences and Transfer of Credibility. , 1974 .

[25]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  WebQual: An Instrument for Consumer Evaluation of Web Sites , 2007, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[26]  S. Tefft Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2002 .

[27]  Hung-Pin Shih,et al.  Influences of Web interactivity and social identity and bonds on the quality of online discussion in a virtual community , 2014, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[28]  Stuart J. Barnes,et al.  Can consumers be persuaded on brand microblogs? An empirical study , 2018, Inf. Manag..

[29]  Carlos Flavián,et al.  The role of perceived usability, reputation, satisfaction and consumer familiarity on the website loyalty formation process , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  Li Jiang,et al.  Trust and Electronic Government Success: An Empirical Study , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  H Austin,et al.  The economics of information systems. , 1986, Computers in healthcare.

[32]  J. Grimes,et al.  Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e‐government , 2012 .

[33]  William J. Doll,et al.  The quality of user documentation , 1987, Inf. Manag..

[34]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Managing Citizens' Uncertainty in E-Government Services: The Mediating and Moderating Roles of Transparency and Trust , 2016, Inf. Syst. Res..

[35]  Yonghong Wu,et al.  Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[36]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[37]  Debbie Goh,et al.  Social media and citizen engagement: A meta-analytic review , 2016, New Media Soc..

[38]  Enrique Bonsón,et al.  Citizens' engagement on local governments' Facebook sites. An empirical analysis: The impact of different media and content types in Western Europe , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[39]  Jiawen Chen,et al.  Trust transfer in social media brand communities: The role of consumer engagement , 2018, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[40]  Andrea Everard,et al.  How Presentation Flaws Affect Perceived Site Quality, Trust, and Intention to Purchase from an Online Store , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  A meta-analysis of existing research on citizen adoption of e-government , 2013, Information Systems Frontiers.

[42]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  The elements of computer credibility , 1999, CHI '99.

[43]  Eric W. T. Ngai,et al.  Social media research: Theories, constructs, and conceptual frameworks , 2015, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[44]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[45]  Shelley Boulianne Social media use and participation: a meta-analysis of current research , 2015 .

[46]  Adel M. Aladwani A quality-facilitated socialization model of social commerce decisions , 2018, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[47]  Yair Levy,et al.  The Effect of Information Quality on Trust in E-Government Systems , 2012, AMCIS.

[48]  Roman Lukyanenko,et al.  The IQ of the Crowd: Understanding and Improving Information Quality in Structured User-Generated Content , 2014, Inf. Syst. Res..

[49]  K. Eisenhardt Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[50]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management , 2009 .

[51]  BenbasatIzak,et al.  The effects of personalizaion and familiarity on trust and adoption of recommendation agents , 2006 .

[52]  Tomasz Janowski,et al.  Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[53]  Adel M. Aladwani The 6As model of social content management , 2014, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[54]  John R. Koza,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. , 1995, Artificial Life.

[55]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  Software Engineering Economics , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[56]  Paul Benjamin Lowry,et al.  Explaining and Predicting the Impact of Branding Alliances and Web Site Quality on Initial Consumer Trust of E-Commerce Web Sites , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[57]  Chin-Lung Hsu,et al.  Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[58]  Adel M. Aladwani A contingency model of citizens' attitudes toward e-government use , 2013, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[59]  Adel M. Aladwani The development of two tools for measuring the easiness and usefulness of transactional Web sites , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[60]  Jae Jeung Rho,et al.  Trust in government's social media service and citizen's patronage behavior , 2015, Telematics Informatics.

[61]  Morad Benyoucef,et al.  Where the shoe pinches: Realizing dominant problems as an organizational social media business profile evolves , 2018, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[62]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Encouraging Citizen Adoption of eGovernment by Building Trust , 2002, Electron. Mark..

[63]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Examining branding co-creation in brand communities on social media: Applying the paradigm of Stimulus-Organism-Response , 2018, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[64]  F. H. Hankins,et al.  The Psychology of Social Norms , 1937 .

[65]  Jennie M. Burroughs,et al.  What users want: Assessing government information preferences to drive information services , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[66]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Advances in Social Media Research: Past, Present and Future , 2017, Information Systems Frontiers.

[67]  Adel M. Aladwani The Moderating Influence of Socially-Inspired Trust on the Connection Between Persuasive Governmental Social Media Quality and Success , 2018, WorldCIST.

[68]  Fang Zhao,et al.  Effects of national culture on e-government diffusion - A global study of 55 countries , 2014, Inf. Manag..

[69]  C. Berger,et al.  SOME EXPLORATIONS IN INITIAL INTERACTION AND BEYOND: TOWARD A DEVELOPMENTAL THEORY OF INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION , 1975 .

[70]  R. Spears,et al.  Paralanguage and social perception in computer‐mediated communication , 1992 .

[71]  Benoit Aubert,et al.  Citizenship, trust, and behavioural intentions to use public e-services: The case of Lebanon , 2015, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[72]  Patric R. Spence,et al.  Is that a bot running the social media feed? Testing the differences in perceptions of communication quality for a human agent and a bot agent on Twitter , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[73]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[74]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Management Information Systems: Appreciation and Involvement , 1974 .

[75]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[76]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Citizen Trust Development for E-Government Adoption and Usage: Insights from Young Adults in Singapore , 2009, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[77]  France Bélanger,et al.  The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[78]  G. Johns The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational Behavior , 2006 .

[79]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. , 1978, Administrative science quarterly.

[80]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Modeling Citizen Satisfaction with Mandatory Adoption of an E-Government Technology , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[81]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Transforming Government : People , Process and Policy , 2017 .

[82]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures , 2011, TMIS.

[83]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[84]  Thomas C. Redman,et al.  Data Quality Management and Technology , 1992 .

[85]  S. Asch Opinions and Social Pressure , 1955, Nature.

[86]  Gary D. Phye,et al.  Learning and Remembering: The Basis for Personal Knowledge Construction , 1997 .

[87]  C. Steinfield,et al.  A Social Information Processing Model of Media Use in Organizations , 1987 .

[88]  William Golden,et al.  Measuring eGovernment success: a public value approach , 2016, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[89]  Rob Kling,et al.  Social Analyses of Computing: Theoretical Perspectives in Recent Empirical Research , 1980, CSUR.

[90]  Adel M. Aladwani Compatible quality of social media content: Conceptualization, measurement, and affordances , 2017, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[91]  Shin-Yuan Hung,et al.  User acceptance of mobile e-government services: An empirical study , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[92]  Staci M. Zavattaro,et al.  A sentiment analysis of U.S. local government tweets: The connection between tone and citizen involvement , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[93]  Ting Li,et al.  Willing to pay for quality personalization? Trade-off between quality and privacy , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[94]  David W. Park,et al.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1994 .

[95]  L. Doob The psychology of social norms. , 1937 .

[96]  D. Harrison McKnight,et al.  Perceived Information Quality in Data Exchanges: Effects on Risk, Trust, and Intention to Use , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..