Effects of Credibility Indicators on Social Media News Sharing Intent

In recent years, social media services have been leveraged to spread fake news stories. Helping people spot fake stories by marking them with credibility indicators could dissuade them from sharing such stories, thus reducing their amplification. We carried out an online study (N = 1,512) to explore the impact of four types of credibility indicators on people's intent to share news headlines with their friends on social media. We confirmed that credibility indicators can indeed decrease the propensity to share fake news. However, the impact of the indicators varied, with fact checking services being the most effective. We further found notable differences in responses to the indicators based on demographic and personal characteristics and social media usage frequency. Our findings have important implications for curbing the spread of misinformation via social media platforms.

[1]  Kate Starbird,et al.  Rumors, False Flags, and Digital Vigilantes: Misinformation on Twitter after the 2013 Boston Marathon Bombing , 2014 .

[2]  Rafael Vieira,et al.  Can Machines Learn to Detect Fake News? A Survey Focused on Social Media , 2019, HICSS.

[3]  M. Gentzkow,et al.  Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election , 2017 .

[4]  Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia,et al.  The spread of low-credibility content by social bots , 2017, Nature Communications.

[5]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The science of fake news , 2018, Science.

[6]  Michela Del Vicario,et al.  Public discourse and news consumption on online social media: A quantitative, cross-platform analysis of the Italian Referendum , 2017, ArXiv.

[7]  Jalal Mahmud,et al.  Why Do You Spread This Message? Understanding Users Sentiment in Social Media Campaigns , 2014, ICWSM.

[8]  William R. Hobbs,et al.  Combating fake news: an agenda for research and action , 2017 .

[9]  Gregory N. Mandel,et al.  The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks , 2012 .

[10]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Bots increase exposure to negative and inflammatory content in online social systems , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Fabrício Benevenuto,et al.  Supervised Learning for Fake News Detection , 2019, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[12]  Arnaud Legout,et al.  Social Clicks: What and Who Gets Read on Twitter? , 2016, SIGMETRICS.

[13]  Suhang Wang,et al.  Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective , 2017, SKDD.

[14]  S. Sloman,et al.  Your Understanding Is My Understanding , 2016, Psychological science.

[15]  David A. Broniatowski,et al.  Weaponized Health Communication: Twitter Bots and Russian Trolls Amplify the Vaccine Debate , 2018, American journal of public health.

[16]  WanSoo Lee.  Why do people fall for fake news , 2019 .

[17]  Bruce Schneier,et al.  Common-Knowledge Attacks on Democracy , 2018 .

[18]  Mor Naaman,et al.  The Role of Source, Headline and Expressive Responding in Political News Evaluation , 2018 .

[19]  Chei Sian Lee,et al.  Understanding news sharing in social media: An explanation from the diffusion of innovations theory , 2014, Online Inf. Rev..

[20]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  Digital wildfires: hyper-connectivity, havoc and a global ethos to govern social media , 2016, CSOC.

[21]  Rohini K. Srihari,et al.  BREAKING! Presenting Fake News Corpus for Automated Fact Checking , 2019, ACL.

[22]  Chei Sian Lee,et al.  News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  David G. Rand,et al.  Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning , 2019, Cognition.

[24]  Sinan Aral,et al.  The spread of true and false news online , 2018, Science.

[25]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Leveraging the Crowd to Detect and Reduce the Spread of Fake News and Misinformation , 2017, WSDM.

[26]  W. Nuland,et al.  Information operations and Facebook , 2017 .

[27]  Scott J. Shackelford,et al.  Making Democracy Harder to Hack , 2017, University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform.

[28]  Yang Liu,et al.  Early Detection of Fake News on Social Media Through Propagation Path Classification with Recurrent and Convolutional Networks , 2018, AAAI.

[29]  Ethan Porter,et al.  The Elusive Backfire Effect: Mass Attitudes’ Steadfast Factual Adherence , 2019 .

[30]  Cong Yu,et al.  Data In, Fact Out: Automated Monitoring of Facts by FactWatcher , 2014, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[31]  David G. Rand,et al.  Will the Crowd Game the Algorithm?: Using Layperson Judgments to Combat Misinformation on Social Media by Downranking Distrusted Sources , 2020, CHI.

[32]  Markus Brauer,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models and the Analysis of Nonindependent Data: A Unified Framework to Analyze Categorical and Continuous Independent Variables that Vary Within-Subjects and/or Within-Items , 2017, Psychological methods.

[33]  Harith Alani,et al.  Misinformation : Challenges and Future Directions Conference or Workshop Item , 2018 .

[34]  Bodo Winter,et al.  Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications , 2013, ArXiv.

[35]  Sebastian Tschiatschek,et al.  Fake News Detection in Social Networks via Crowd Signals , 2017, WWW.

[36]  B. Nyhan,et al.  When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions , 2010 .

[37]  E. Katz,et al.  Uses and Gratifications Research , 2019, The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies.

[38]  B. Nyhan,et al.  Taking Fact-Checks Literally But Not Seriously? The Effects of Journalistic Fact-Checking on Factual Beliefs and Candidate Favorability , 2017, Political Behavior.

[39]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Iffy Quotient : A Platform Health Metric for Misinformation , 2019 .

[40]  David G. Rand,et al.  Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Virgílio A. F. Almeida,et al.  "Everything I Disagree With is #FakeNews": Correlating Political Polarization and Spread of Misinformation , 2017, ArXiv.

[42]  R. Michael Alvarez,et al.  Paying Attention to Inattentive Survey Respondents , 2019, Political Analysis.

[43]  Sibel Adali,et al.  This Just In: Fake News Packs a Lot in Title, Uses Simpler, Repetitive Content in Text Body, More Similar to Satire than Real News , 2017, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.

[44]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[45]  Sungyong Seo,et al.  CSI: A Hybrid Deep Model for Fake News Detection , 2017, CIKM.

[46]  David G. Rand,et al.  The Implied Truth Effect: Attaching Warnings to a Subset of Fake News Headlines Increases Perceived Accuracy of Headlines Without Warnings , 2019, Manag. Sci..

[47]  E. Papalexakis.  Unsupervised Content-Based Identification of Fake News Articles with Tensor Decomposition Ensembles , 2018 .

[48]  Filippo Menczer,et al.  Measuring Online Social Bubbles , 2015, 1502.07162.