Assessment of articular cartilage thickness of the humeral head: MR-anatomic correlation in cadavers.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of our study was to evaluate several commonly used MR sequences to determine how accurately each demonstrates the thickness of the articular cartilage of the humeral head. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ten cadaveric shoulders (age at death, 58-92 years; mean, 79 years) were imaged with fat-suppressed transaxial T1-weighted spin-echo three-dimensional gradient-recalled sequences, both before and after injection of 12 ml of diluted gadopentetate dimeglumine. Articular cartilage was measured to the nearest 10th of a millimeter on the MR images and corresponding anatomic sections. RESULTS Cartilage could not be differentiated from surrounding structures in 14 of 112 locations (13%) on the spin-echo images obtained without contrast material, in 4 of 112 locations (4%) on the spin-echo images obtained with contrast material, in 4 of 112 locations (4%) on the gradient-echo images obtained without contrast material, and in 6 of 112 locations (5%) on the gradient-echo images obtained with contrast material. Mean true cartilage thickness was 1.23 mm (SD, 0.52 mm). The mean MR-anatomic differences (absolute values) were 0.38 mm for the spin-echo images obtained without contrast material, 0.42 mm for the spin-echo images obtained with contrast material, 0.49 mm for the gradient-echo images obtained without contrast material, and 0.37 mm for the gradient-echo images obtained with contrast material. There was a tendency to overestimate thin cartilage and to underestimate thick cartilage. CONCLUSION Several of the routinely used MR sequences, with and without intraarticular contrast medium, may cause errors in the assessment of the articular cartilage of the humeral head. Some of these errors result from either insufficient contrast between cartilage and surrounding structures or inadequately concentrated contrast medium.

[1]  G. Bongartz,et al.  Degenerative cartilage lesions of the hip--magnetic resonance evaluation. , 1989, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[2]  H K Genant,et al.  MR imaging of the arthritic knee: improved discrimination of cartilage, synovium, and effusion with pulsed saturation transfer and fat-suppressed T1-weighted sequences. , 1994, Radiology.

[3]  C. Heron,et al.  Three-dimensional gradient-echo MR imaging of the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 100 patients. , 1992, Radiology.

[4]  D. Sartoris,et al.  Articular cartilage defects: detectability in cadaver knees with MR. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  T. McCauley,et al.  Chondromalacia patellae: diagnosis with MR imaging. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  D Resnick,et al.  Knee hyaline cartilage evaluated with MR imaging: a cadaveric study involving multiple imaging sequences and intraarticular injection of gadolinium and saline solution. , 1991, Radiology.

[7]  M Deimling,et al.  Cartilage disorders: comparison of spin-echo, CHESS, and FLASH sequence MR images. , 1987, Radiology.

[8]  F. Hall,et al.  Thickness of articular cartilage in the normal knee. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  M K Jasani,et al.  High resolution, high field magnetic resonance imaging of joints: unexpected features in proton images of cartilage. , 1990, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  F. Handelberg,et al.  Chondral lesions of the patella evaluated with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopy. , 1990, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[11]  C C Glüer,et al.  Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. , 1994, Radiology.

[12]  S. Carmichael,et al.  MR imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: Evaluation of two‐ and three‐dimensional sequences , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  J Szumowski,et al.  MR Fat Suppression Technique in the Evaluation of Normal Structures of the Knee , 1989, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  J. Hodler,et al.  Inexpensive technique for performing magnetic resonance-pathologic correlation in cadavers. , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[15]  J. B. Kneeland,et al.  Articular cartilage: correlation of histologic zones with signal intensity at MR imaging. , 1991, Radiology.

[16]  D Resnick,et al.  Abnormalities of articular cartilage in the knee: analysis of available MR techniques. , 1993, Radiology.

[17]  D Resnick,et al.  Width of the articular cartilage of the hip: quantification by using fat-suppression spin-echo MR imaging in cadavers. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  S. Kay,et al.  Early degenerative joint disease simulating impingement syndrome: arthroscopic findings. , 1992, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.