Non-Gaussian statistical properties of virtual breast phantoms

Images derived from a “phantom” are useful for characterizing the performance of imaging systems. In particular, the modulation transfer properties of imaging detectors are traditionally assessed by physical phantoms consisting of an edge. More recently researchers have come to realize that quantifying the effects of object variability can also be accomplished with phantoms in modalities such as breast imaging where anatomical structure may be the principal limitation in performance. This has driven development of virtual phantoms that can be used in simulation environments. In breast imaging, several such phantoms have been proposed. In this work, we analyze non-Gaussian statistical properties of virtual phantoms, and compare them to similar statistics from a database of breast images. The virtual phantoms assessed consist of three classes. The first is known as clustered-blob lumpy backgrounds. The second class is “binarized” textures which typically apply some sort of threshold to a stochastic 3D texture intended to represent the distribution of adipose and glandular tissue in the breast. The third approach comes from efforts at the University of Pennsylvania to directly simulate the 3D anatomy of the breast. We use Laplacian fractional entropy (LFE) as a measure of the non-Gaussian statistical properties of each simulation. Our results show that the simulation approaches differ considerably in LFE with very low scores for the clustered-blob lumpy background to very high values for the UPenn phantom. These results suggest that LFE may have value in developing and tuning virtual phantom simulation procedures.

[1]  A. Burgess,et al.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. , 2001, Medical physics.

[2]  Francis R. Verdun,et al.  Detectability of radiological images: the influence of anatomical noise , 1995, Medical Imaging.

[3]  Robert Shapley,et al.  Receptive field structure of neurons in monkey primary visual cortex revealed by stimulation with natural image sequences. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[4]  H H Barrett,et al.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.

[6]  R P Velthuizen,et al.  On the statistical nature of mammograms. , 1999, Medical physics.

[7]  M J Yaffe,et al.  The myth of the 50-50 breast. , 2009, Medical physics.

[8]  R M Nishikawa,et al.  Task-based assessment of breast tomosynthesis: effect of acquisition parameters and quantum noise. , 2010, Medical physics.

[9]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation. I. Breast tissue model and image acquisition simulation. , 2002, Medical physics.

[10]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  An Ideal Observer for a Model of X-Ray Imaging in Breast Parenchymal Tissue , 2008, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[11]  J. Boone,et al.  Non-Gaussian statistical properties of breast images. , 2012, Medical physics.

[12]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Development and characterization of an anthropomorphic breast software phantom based upon region-growing algorithm. , 2011, Medical physics.

[13]  D. K. Cullers,et al.  Multiresolution statistical analysis of high-resolution digital mammograms , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Optimized generation of high resolution breast anthropomorphic software phantoms. , 2012, Medical physics.

[15]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[16]  C Abbey,et al.  Statistical texture synthesis of mammographic images with super-blob lumpy backgrounds. , 1999, Optics express.

[17]  Pierre-Edouard Sottas,et al.  Mammographic texture synthesis: second-generation clustered lumpy backgrounds using a genetic algorithm. , 2008, Optics express.

[18]  John M Boone,et al.  Characterizing anatomical variability in breast CT images. , 2008, Medical physics.