Ferromagnetic shape memory alloy actuator enabled for nanometric position control using hysteresis compensation

Abstract Ferromagnetic shape memory alloys (FSMA) are a special type of smart materials that change their shape under an applied magnetic field. They present attractive properties for precise positioning systems because the magnetic-induced response is fast and can produce large movements, with the additional advantage of non-contact operation. Their usability is limited by the poor reproducibility of their response to a given stimulus. This is a consequence of the stochastic microscopic processes that produce their macroscopic deformation and, most of all, of the great hysteresis displayed in cyclic operation. Suitable feedback control can overcome that limitation. In this work we show how a commercial FSMA actuator, manufactured by AdaptaMat Ltd., can be enabled for accurate and efficient nanopositioning by adequate control of the drive signal. First, an exhaustive series of tests are described that thoroughly characterize the open-loop response of the actuator: maximum displacement range, hysteresis and repeatability under different drive current amplitudes and frequencies. Second, different feedback control schemes are tested, based on an ordinary Proportional–Integral–Derivative (PID) controller modified with a gain scheduling strategy that helps accounting for the nonlinearity of the system, adjusting the operation of the controller according to the actuation requirements. The positioning accuracy achieved at this stage is about 25 nm, which is close to the detection limit of the capacitive sensor used for measurement and feedback. Finally, a method to compensate the intrinsic hysteresis of the system is implemented and included in the control strategy. The partial cancellation of the system nonlinearities allows for the best performance, considerably reducing the control effort, and improving the transient time and overshoot.

[1]  I. Mayergoyz Mathematical models of hysteresis and their applications , 2003 .

[2]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  An approach to reduction of hysteresis in smart materials , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[3]  Victor Etxebarria,et al.  Ferromagnetic Shape Memory Alloy Actuator for Micro- and Nano-Positioning , 2009 .

[4]  Samuel M. Allen,et al.  Nonuniform twin-boundary motion in Ni–Mn–Ga single crystals , 2004 .

[5]  V. V. Kokorin,et al.  Magnetically controlled shape memory effect in Ni2MnGa intermetallics , 1997 .

[6]  Ralph C. Smith Inverse compensation for hysteresis in magnetostrictive transducers , 2001 .

[7]  Victor Etxebarria,et al.  Ferromagnetic shape memory alloys for positioning with nanometric resolution , 2009 .

[8]  Leonardo Riccardi,et al.  Position Control for a Magnetic Shape Memory Actuator , 2010 .

[9]  Leonardo Riccardi,et al.  Robust adaptive control of a Magnetic Shape Memory actuator for precise positioning , 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference.

[10]  H. Tan,et al.  A nonlinear model for ferromagnetic shape memory alloy actuators , 2008 .

[11]  V. V. Kokorin,et al.  Sequential formation of martensitic phases during uniaxial loading of single crystals of alloy Ni2MnGa , 1991 .

[12]  Torsten Bertram,et al.  Observer-based inverse hysteresis control of prototypical magnetic shape memory (MSM) actuator , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics.

[13]  A. A. Likhachev,et al.  Giant magnetic-field-induced strain in NiMnGa seven-layered martensitic phase , 2002 .

[14]  Samuel M. Allen,et al.  ac field-induced actuation of single crystal Ni–Mn–Ga , 2002 .

[15]  Doron Shilo,et al.  Ferromagnetic shape memory flapper , 2009 .

[16]  Gangbing Song,et al.  Precision tracking control of shape memory alloy actuators using neural networks and a sliding-mode based robust controller , 2003 .

[17]  Gang Tao,et al.  Adaptive Control of Systems with Actuator and Sensor Nonlinearities , 1996 .

[18]  Kari Ullakko,et al.  BASIC PROPERTIES OF MAGNETIC SHAPE MEMORY ACTUATORS , 2002 .

[19]  Elena Villa,et al.  The high potential of shape memory alloys in developing miniature mechanical devices: A review on shape memory alloy mini-actuators , 2010 .

[20]  V. V. Kokorin,et al.  Phase transitions in Ni2MnGa under compression , 1991 .

[21]  V. V. Kokorin,et al.  Pre-martensitic state in Ni-Mn-Ga alloys , 1996 .

[22]  D. Jiles,et al.  Theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis , 1986 .

[23]  Minoru Taya,et al.  Design of torque actuator based on ferromagnetic shape memory alloy composite , 2004, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[24]  Tore Hägglund,et al.  Advanced PID Control , 2005 .

[25]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Phase control approach to hysteresis reduction , 2001, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[26]  Samuel M. Allen,et al.  6% magnetic-field-induced strain by twin-boundary motion in ferromagnetic Ni–Mn–Ga , 2000 .

[27]  F. Ikhouane,et al.  Systems with Hysteresis: Analysis, Identification and Control Using the Bouc-Wen Model , 2007 .

[28]  Victor Etxebarria,et al.  Neural network-based micropositioning control of smart shape memory alloy actuators , 2008, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..