Ergonomic evaluation of ubiquitous computing with monocular head-mounted display

In this paper, the authors conducted an experiment to evaluate the UX in an actual outdoor environment, assuming the casual use of monocular HMD to view video content while short walking. In conducting the experiment, eight subjects were asked to view news videos on a monocular HMD while walking through a large shopping mall. Two types of monocular HMDs and a hand-held media player were used, and the psycho-physiological responses of the subjects were measured before, during, and after the experiment. The VSQ, SSQ and NASA-TLX were used to assess the subjective workloads and symptoms. The objective indexes were heart rate and stride and a video recording of the environment in front of the subject's face. The results revealed differences between the two types of monocular HMDs as well as between the monocular HMDs and other conditions. Differences between the types of monocular HMDs may have been due to screen vibration during walking, and it was considered as a major factor in the UX in terms of the workload. Future experiments to be conducted in other locations will have higher cognitive loads in order to study the performance and the situation awareness to actual and media environments.

[1]  Clarence E. Rash,et al.  The Effect of a Monocular Helmet-Mounted Display on Aircrew Health: A Cohort Study of Apache AH MK1 Pilots Initial Report , 2001 .

[2]  Daniel A. Steingart,et al.  Design of monocular head-mounted displays for increased indoor firefighting safety and efficiency , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[3]  M. Polonen,et al.  Near-to-Eye Display—An Accessory for Handheld Multimedia Devices: Subjective Studies , 2009, Journal of Display Technology.

[4]  D. F. Ormerod,et al.  Use of a see-through head-worn display of patient monitoring data to enhance anesthesiologists' response to abnormal clinical events , 2002, Proceedings. Sixth International Symposium on Wearable Computers,.

[5]  Clarence E. Rash,et al.  AH-64 IHADSS aviator vision experiences in Operation Iraqi Freedom , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[6]  P. Hancock,et al.  Human Mental Workload , 1988 .

[7]  Philip B. Whyman,et al.  The Impact of the Euro , 2000 .

[8]  Jukka Häkkinen,et al.  Midwives experiences of using HMD in ultrasound scan , 2006, NordiCHI '06.

[9]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Visual Awareness: The Role of Attention , 1999, Perception.

[10]  Hendrik Knoche,et al.  Design requirements for mobile TV , 2005, Mobile HCI.

[11]  Jude F. Mitchell,et al.  Object-based attention determines dominance in binocular rivalry , 2004, Nature.

[12]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .

[13]  Clarence E. Rash,et al.  The Impact of the U.S. Army's AH-64 Helmet Mounted Display on Future Aviation Helmet Design , 1988 .

[14]  Howell Istance,et al.  The association between visual discomfort and the use of visual display units , 1985 .

[15]  John W. Ruffner,et al.  Near-to-eye display concepts for air traffic controllers , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[16]  Jeffrey A. Friend,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of a Monocular Head Mounted Display Device Versus a Flat Screen Display Device in Presenting Aircraft Maintenance Technical Data , 1992 .