Effects of Right Parietal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Object Identification and Orientation Judgments

We investigated the role played by the right parietal lobe in object identification and the ability to interpret object orientation, using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to momentarily interfere with ongoing cortical activity. Short trains of TMS pulses (12 Hz) were applied to a site overlying the right intraparietal sulcus/inferior parietal lobe while subjects performed either object identification tasks (i.e., picture-word verification and categorizing objects as natural or manufactured) or object orientation judgment tasks (i.e., picture-arrow verification and deciding whether an object was rotated clockwise or counterclockwise). Across different tasks, right parietal TMS impaired orientation judgments, but facilitated object identification, compared to TMS applied to a brain vertex control site. These complementary findings demonstrate that the right parietal lobea region belonging to the dorsal visual streamis critical for processing the spatial attributes of objects, but not their identity. The observed improvement in object recognition, however, suggests an indirect role for the right parietal lobe in object recognition. We propose that this involves the creation of a spatial reference frame for the object, which allows interaction with the object and the individuation of specific viewing instances.

[1]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[2]  Elizabeth K. Warrington,et al.  Visual Apperceptive Agnosia: A Clinico-Anatomical Study of Three Cases , 1988, Cortex.

[3]  Paul E. Dux,et al.  Viewpoint costs occur during consolidation: Evidence from the attentional blink , 2007, Cognition.

[4]  H. Sakata,et al.  Neural representation of three-dimensional features of manipulation objects with stereopsis , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  A. Leventhal,et al.  Signal timing across the macaque visual system. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Paul E. Dux,et al.  Orientation-invariant object recognition: evidence from repetition blindness , 2005, Cognition.

[7]  Carlo Miniussi,et al.  The mechanism of transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognition , 2010, Cortex.

[8]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The human visual cortex. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[9]  Carlo Miniussi,et al.  Parietal Lobe Contribution to Mental Rotation Demonstrated with rTMS , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Similar cortical correlates underlie visual object identification and orientation judgment , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Neuronal representation of object orientation , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Li Zhaoping,et al.  Facilitation of bottom-up feature detection following rTMS-interference of the right parietal cortex , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  J Douglas Crawford,et al.  TMS over human frontal eye fields disrupts trans-saccadic memory of multiple objects. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  Masaru Mimura,et al.  Room tilt illusion in Parkinson's disease: Loss of spatial reference frames? , 2009, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[15]  E. Halgren,et al.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  P. Jolicoeur The time to name disoriented natural objects , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Cyrill v. Tiesenhausen,et al.  The navigation of transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2001, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[18]  R. Goebel,et al.  The Dynamics of Interhemispheric Compensatory Processes in Mental Imagery , 2005, Science.

[19]  A. Taylor,et al.  The contribution of the right parietal lobe to object recognition. , 1973, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[20]  C. Büchel,et al.  Surface orientation discrimination activates caudal and anterior intraparietal sulcus in humans: an event-related fMRI study. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[22]  M. J. Eacott,et al.  The role of monkey inferior parietal cortex in visual discrimination of identity and orientation of shapes , 1991, Behavioural Brain Research.

[23]  Rosaleen A. McCarthy,et al.  When is a view unusual? A single case study of orientation-dependent visual agnosia , 1996, Brain Research Bulletin.

[24]  Thomas Dierks,et al.  Tracking the Mind's Image in the Brain II Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reveals Parietal Asymmetry in Visuospatial Imagery , 2002, Neuron.

[25]  Motoichiro Kato,et al.  A 3-year follow-up study of ‘orientation agnosia’ , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  E. Warrington,et al.  Two Categorical Stages of Object Recognition , 1978, Perception.

[27]  Sergio Della Sala,et al.  Agnosia for Object Orientation: Naming and Mental Rotation Evidence , 2002, Neurocase.

[28]  Sergio Della Sala,et al.  Agnosia for object orientation: Implications for theories of object recognition , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  H. Sakata,et al.  Selectivity of the parietal visual neurones in 3D orientation of surface of stereoscopic stimuli. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[30]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  Object Orientation Agnosia: A Failure to Find the Axis? , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  R Kawashima,et al.  A PET study of axis orientation discrimination , 1998, Neuroreport.

[32]  Irina M Harris,et al.  Turning objects on their heads: The influence of the stored axis on object individuation , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  M. Tarr,et al.  Visual Object Recognition , 1996, ISTCS.

[34]  K. D. Singh,et al.  Co‐registration of cortical magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1998, Neuroreport.

[35]  M Jeannerod,et al.  Visual working memory for shape and 3D‐orientation: a PET study , 1997, Neuroreport.