Public Policies on Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Governments in Europe

Over the last decade, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has been defined first as a concept whereby companies decide voluntarily to contribute to a better society and cleaner environment and, second, as a process by which companies manage their relationship␣with stakeholders (European Commission, 2001. Nowadays, CSR has become a priority issue on governments’ agendas. This has changed governments’ capacity to act and impact on social and environmental issues in their relationship with companies, but has also affected the framework in which CSR public policies are designed: governments are incorporating multi-stakeholder strategies. This article analyzes the CSR public policies in European advanced democracies, and more specifically the EU-15 countries, and provides explanatory keys on how governments have understood, designed and implemented their CSR public policies. The analysis has entailed the classification of CSR public policies taking into consideration the actor to which the governments’ policies were addressed. This approach to the analysis of CSR public policies in the EU-15 countries leads us to observe coinciding lines of action among the different countries analyzed, which has enabled us to propose a ‹four ideal’ typology model for governmental action on CSR in Europe: Partnership, Business in the Community, Sustainability, and Citizenship, and Agora. The main contribution of this article is to propose an analytical framework to analyze CSR public policies, which provide a perspective on the relationships between governments, businesses, and civil society stakeholders, and enable us to incorporate the analysis of CSR public policies into a broader approach focused on social governance.

[1]  R. E. Freeman,et al.  Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance , 1983 .

[2]  L. L. Rodrigues,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives , 2006 .

[3]  Richard E. Wokutch,et al.  Corporate Saints and Sinners: The Effects of Philanthropic and Illegal Activity on Organizational Performance , 1987 .

[4]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[5]  N. Roome.  Pan-European Approach , 2005 .

[6]  M. Clarkson.  The corporation and its stakeholders : classic and contemporary readings , 1998 .

[7]  Rob Bauer,et al.  International Evidence on Ethical Mutual Fund Performance and Investment Style , 2002 .

[8]  Dirk Matten,et al.  Business Ethics: A European Perspective: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization , 2004 .

[9]  J. McGuire,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance , 1988 .

[10]  J. Moon.  Government as a Driver of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2004 .

[11]  J. Calton,et al.  Towards a managerial practice of stakeholder engagement: developing multi-stakeholder learning dialogues , 2002 .

[12]  M. Clarkson.  A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[13]  A. Carroll.  The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders , 1991 .

[14]  Muel Kaptein,et al.  Toward Effective Stakeholder Dialogue , 2003 .

[15]  M. Statman,et al.  Doing Well While Doing Good? The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds , 1993 .

[16]  Thomas W. Dunfee,et al.  How Binding the Ties? Business Ethics as Integrative Social ContractsTies That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics , 1999 .

[17]  J. Fischer.  Social Responsibility and Ethics: Clarifying the Concepts , 2004 .

[18]  W. Cragg.  Business Ethics and Stakeholder Theory , 2002, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[19]  Ann Buchholtz,et al.  Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management , 2005 .

[20]  Graeme Auld,et al.  The New Corporate Social Responsibility , 2008 .

[21]  C. D. Sinclair,et al.  Evaluating the Performance of Ethical and Non-Ethical Funds: A Matched Pair Analysis , 2005 .

[22]  E. Guarini,et al.  CSR Role in Public – Private Partnerships: Models of Governance , 2002 .

[23]  David Wheeler,et al.  The Stakeholder Corporation , 1997 .

[24]  J. Calton,et al.  Towards a Managerial Practice of Stakeholder Engagement , 2002 .

[25]  J. Lozano,et al.  Los gobiernos y la responsabilidad social de las empresas: políticas públicas más allá de la regulación y la voluntariedad , 2005 .

[26]  William R. Hersh,et al.  Research Paper n , 1994 .

[27]  A. Pettigrew.  Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[28]  C. Daily,et al.  The constituents of corporate responsibility: Separate, but not separable, interests? , 1991 .

[29]  古允文.  書評 Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies (Oxford University Press, 1999) , 1999 .

[30]  Lorne Cummings,et al.  The Financial Performance of Ethical Investment Trusts: An Australian Perspective , 2000 .

[31]  M. A. Wahba,et al.  Maslow reconsidered: A review of research on the need hierarchy theory , 1976 .

[32]  Lee D. Parker,et al.  The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis , 1987 .

[33]  J. Lozano,et al.  Governments and Corporate Social Responsibility , 2008 .

[34]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[35]  D. Melé,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory , 2004 .

[36]  J. Lozano,et al.  The Role of Governments in Fostering CSR , 2006 .

[37]  J. Moon.  The Social Responsibility of Business and New Governance 1 , 2002, Government and Opposition.

[38]  Brahim Saadouni,et al.  The Financial Performance of Ethical Investment Funds , 1995 .

[39]  A. Carroll.  Corporate Social Responsibility , 1999, The Routledge Companion to Corporate Social Responsibility.

[40]  Ann Buchholtz,et al.  Business & Society Ethics and Stakeholder Management , 2006 .

[41]  J. Álvarez,et al.  Marco conceptual de la responsabilidad social corporativa , 2004 .

[42]  R. Suddaby.  From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not , 2006 .

[43]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE, FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE, AND FIRM GOVERNANCE. , 1994 .

[44]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[45]  J. Moon,et al.  Pan-European Approach , 2005 .

[46]  R. Schmidpeter,et al.  Corporate social responsibility across Europe , 2005 .

[47]  A. Midttun.  Realigning business, government and civil society , 2005 .

[48]  Halina Ward,et al.  Public sector roles in strengthening corporate social responsibility: a baseline study , 2002 .

[49]  J. David Diltz,et al.  The private cost of socially responsible investing , 1995 .

[50]  L. J. Brooks.  Business Ethics in Canada: Distinctiveness and Directions , 1997 .

[51]  S. Waddock.  Leading Corporate Citizens: Vision, Values, Value Added , 2001 .

[52]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[53]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[54]  S. Breckler.  Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[55]  Tamyko Ysa,et al.  Governments and Corporate Social Responsibility: Public Policies Beyond Regulation and Voluntary Compliance , 2007 .

[56]  Thomas Donaldson,et al.  The Ethical Wealth of Nations , 2001 .

[57]  Robert. Luther,et al.  The Performance Of Ethical Unit Trusts: Choosing An Appropriate Benchmark , 1994 .

[58]  C. Hemingway.  Personal Values as A Catalyst for Corporate Social Entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[59]  G. Zappalà,et al.  The Contours of Corporate Community Involvement in Australia's Top Companies , 2003 .

[60]  John D. Benjamin,et al.  Corporate Social Performance and Firm Risk: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2001 .

[61]  Steve Schueth.  Socially Responsible Investing in the United States , 2003 .

[62]  John Matatko,et al.  Ethical Unit Trust Financial Performance: Small Company Effects and Fund Size Effects , 1997 .

[63]  J. Moon,et al.  Pan-European Approach. A Conceptual Framework for Understanding CSR , 2007 .

[64]  A. Carroll.  A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance , 1979 .

[65]  G. Zappalà.  Corporate Citizenship and the Role of Government: the Public Policy Case , 2003 .

[66]  Archie B. Carroll,et al.  Understanding Stakeholder Thinking: Themes from a Finnish Conference , 1997 .

[67]  J. Lozano.  Ética y empresa , 1999 .

[68]  N. Smith,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: Whether or How? , 2003 .

[69]  William Crittenden Frederick,et al.  Corporation Be Good! the Story of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2006 .

[70]  C. Greve.  PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS IN SCANDINAVIA , 2003 .

[71]  J. Calton,et al.  Exploring Research Potentials and Applications for Multi-stakeholder Learning Dialogues , 2004 .

[72]  F. Block,et al.  Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies , 2001 .

[73]  Carol M. Sánchez.  Ties That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics , 1999 .

[74]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[75]  C. Nidasio.  Implementing CSR on a Large Scale: The Role of Government , 2004 .

[76]  R. Freeman,et al.  A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation , 1998 .