Text Messaging and Connectedness Within Close Interpersonal Relationships

Research shows that text messages, short type-written messages sent via mobile telephones, are primarily being used to commence, advance, maintain, or otherwise impact interpersonal relationships. This study describes how respondents perceive and use text messages within close interpersonal dyads. Interviews with dyads resulted in three main themes. Users found texting to be more constant and private than mobile voice interaction. Respondents used texting both to assert autonomy and to maintain connectedness with relational partners. Romantic pairs vis-à-vis nonromantic dyads perceived the benefits of text messages differently.

[1]  Fintan Culwin,et al.  When fingers do the talking: a study of text messaging , 2005, Interact. Comput..

[2]  Kristina Höök,et al.  eMoto: emotionally engaging interaction , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[3]  L. Baxter.  Relational Dialectics Theory: Multivocal Dialogues of Family Communication , 2006 .

[4]  Simon Forge,et al.  Thumb Culture: The Meaning of Mobile Phones for Society , 2007 .

[5]  S. Petronio.  Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure , 2002 .

[6]  Ruth Rettie.  A comparison of four new communication technologies , 2003 .

[7]  Martha Turner,et al.  United States: popular, pragmatic and problematic , 2002 .

[8]  Ditte Laursen.  Please reply! The replying norm in adolescent SMS communication , 2005 .

[9]  Berit Skog.  Mobiles and the Norwegian teen: identity, gender and class , 2002 .

[10]  Chantal de Gournay.  Pretense of intimacy in France , 2002 .

[11]  Steve Howard,et al.  Negotiating presence-in-absence: contact, content and context , 2006, CHI.

[12]  Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn,et al.  Keeping in touch with the family: home and away with the ASTRA awareness system , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[13]  Mizuko Ito,et al.  Intimate Connections: Contextualizing Japanese Youth and Mobile Messaging , 2006, Computers, Phones, and the Internet.

[14]  L. Fortunati.  The mobile phone: Towards new categories and social relations , 2002 .

[15]  Georgi Stojanov,et al.  Computer Interfaces: From Communication to Mind-Prosthesis Metaphor , 2001, Cognitive Technology.

[16]  D. Morgan.  Focus groups for qualitative research. , 1988, Hospital guest relations report.

[17]  Christian Licoppe,et al.  France: preserving the image , 2002 .

[18]  Tasuku Igarashi,et al.  Gender differences in social network development via mobile phone text messages: A longitudinal study , 2005 .

[19]  Panos Markopoulos,et al.  Measuring affective benefits and costs of awareness systems supporting intimate social networks , 2004 .

[20]  Emanuel A. Schegloff.  Beginnings in the telephone , 2002 .

[21]  Louis Leung,et al.  Who are the Mobile Phone Have-Nots? , 1999, New Media Soc..

[22]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  The Inside Text: Social, Cultural and Design Perspectives on SMS (The Computer Supported Cooperative Work Series) , 2005 .

[23]  Martin R. Gibbs,et al.  Mediating intimacy: designing technologies to support strong-tie relationships , 2005, CHI.

[24]  Panos Markopoulos,et al.  The SenseMS: Enriching the SMS Experience for Teens by Non-verbal Means , 2005, INTERACT.

[25]  Emanuel A. Schegloff.  Perpetual Contact: Beginnings in the telephone , 2002 .

[26]  L. Fortunati.  Italy: stereotypes, true and false , 2002 .

[27]  C. Erik Timmerman,et al.  E‐mail communication in workplace romantic relationships , 2003 .

[28]  Yifeng Hu,et al.  Friendships through IM: Examining the Relationship between Instant Messaging and Intimacy , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[29]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  The Inside Text , 2005 .

[30]  Michael Gilding,et al.  ‘I’ve Never Clicked this Much with Anyone in My Life’: Trust and Hyperpersonal Communication in Online Friendships , 2004, New Media Soc..

[31]  Mark Aakhus,et al.  Conclusion: making meaning of mobiles - a theory of Apparatgeist , 2002 .

[32]  Timo Kopomaa,et al.  The Breakthrough of Text Messaging in Finland , 2005 .

[33]  Mark Aakhus,et al.  Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance , 2002 .

[34]  Mary R. Power,et al.  Mobile phones, SMS, and relationships: issues of access, control and privacy , 2005 .

[35]  Ylva Hård af Segerstad,et al.  Language in SMS — a socio-linguistic view , 2005 .

[36]  Nicola Green,et al.  On the Move: Technology, Mobility, and the Mediation of Social Time and Space , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[37]  Eija-Liisa Kasesniemi,et al.  Mobile culture of children and teenagers in Finland , 2002 .

[38]  Mark Aakhus,et al.  Perpetual Contact: Beginnings in the telephone , 2002 .

[39]  Wa Wijnand IJsselsteijn,et al.  Staying in touch : social presence and connectedness through synchronous and asynchonous communication media , 2003 .

[40]  M. Lecompte,et al.  Ethnographic Research and the Problem of Data Reduction1 , 1981 .

[41]  Ruth M. Rettie,et al.  Presence and Embodiment in Mobile Phone Communication , 2005, PsychNology J..

[42]  Scott W. Campbell,et al.  A cross-cultural comparison of perceptions and uses of mobile telephony , 2007, New Media Soc..

[43]  Ruth M. Rettie.  Connectedness: A New Dimension of CMC? , 2003, ICWI.

[44]  R. Byrne,et al.  Preference for SMS versus telephone calls in initiating romantic relationships , 2004 .

[45]  Richard Ling,et al.  Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway , 2002 .

[46]  Thomas R. Lindlof.  Qualitative Communication Research Methods , 1994 .

[47]  James E. Katz,et al.  Magic in the Air: Mobile Communication and the Transformation of Social Life , 2006 .

[48]  Mary Beth Oliver,et al.  Exploring the Effects of Online Advertising on Readers' Perceptions of Online News , 2004 .

[49]  Kazuhiro Kuwabara,et al.  Connectedness oriented communication: fostering a sense of connectedness to augment social relationships , 2002, Proceedings 2002 Symposium on Applications and the Internet (SAINT 2002).

[50]  L. Baxter,et al.  Perceptions of Dialectical Contradictions in Turning Points of Development in Heterosexual Romantic Relationships , 1999 .