Verification and validation study of URANS simulations for an axial waterjet propelled large high-speed ship

The accurate prediction of waterjet propulsion using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is of interest for performance analyses of existing waterjet designs as well as for improvement and design optimization of new waterjet propulsion systems for high-speed marine vehicles. The present work is performed for three main purposes: (1) to investigate the capability of a URANS flow solver, CFDSHIP-IOWA, for the accurate simulation of waterjet propelled ships, including waterjet–hull interactions; (2) to carry out detailed verification and validation (V&V) analysis; and (3) to identify optimization opportunities for intake duct shape design. A concentrated effort is applied to V&V work and performance analysis of waterjet propelled simulations which form the focus of this paper. The joint high speed sealift design (JHSS), which is a design concept for very large high-speed ships operating at transit speeds of at least 36 knots using four axial flow waterjets, is selected as the initial geometry for the current work and subsequent optimization study. For self-propelled simulations, the ship accelerates until the resistance equals the prescribed thrust and added tow force, and converges to the self propulsion point (SPP). Quantitative V&V studies are performed on both barehull and waterjet appended designs, with corresponding experimental fluid dynamics (EFD) data from 1/34 scale model testing. Uncertainty assessments are performed on iterative convergence and grid size. As a result, the total resistance coefficient for the barehull case and SPP for the waterjet propelled case are validated at the average uncertainty intervals of 7.0 and 1.1%D, respectively. Predictions of CFD computations capture the general trend of resistance over the speed range of 18–42 knots, and show reasonable agreement with EFD with average errors of 1.8 and 8.0%D for the barehull and waterjet cases, respectively. Furthermore, results show that URANS is able to accurately predict the major propulsion related features such as volume flow rate, inlet wake fraction, and net jet thrust with an accuracy of ~9%D. The flow feature details inside the duct and interference of the exit jets are qualitatively well-predicted as well. It is found that there are significant losses in inlet efficiency over the speed range; hence, one objective for subsequent optimization studies could be maximizing the inlet efficiency. Overall, the V&V work indicates that the present approach is an efficient tool for predicting the performance of waterjet propelled JHSS ships and paves the way for future optimization work. The main objective of the optimization will be reduction of powering requirements by increasing the inlet efficiency through modification of intake duct shape.

[1]  Tomohiro Takai,et al.  Simulation based design for high speed sea lift with waterjets by high fidelity URANS approach , 2010 .

[2]  Ralph Noack,et al.  SUGGAR: A General Capability for Moving Body Overset Grid Assembly , 2005 .

[3]  Frederick Stern,et al.  GENERAL-PURPOSE PARALLEL UNSTEADY RANS SHIP HYDRODYNAMICS CODE: CFDSHIP-IOWA , 2003 .

[4]  David A. Boger,et al.  Prediction of Hydrodynamic Forces and Moments for Underwater Vehicles Using Overset Grids , 2006 .

[5]  Yusuke Tahara,et al.  Development and Demonstration of CAD/CFD/Optimizer Integrated Simulation-Based Design Framework by Using High-Fidelity Viscous Free-Surface RaNS Equation Solver , 2008 .

[6]  Frederick Stern,et al.  Integral Force/Moment Waterjet Model for CFD Simulations , 2010 .

[7]  David E. Hess,et al.  Computational Hydrodynamic Tools for High-Speed Sealift: Phase II Final Report , 2008 .

[8]  Takanori Hino,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Flow around a Waterjet Propelled Ship , 2009 .

[9]  F. Stern,et al.  Ship motions using single-phase level set with dynamic overset grids , 2007 .

[10]  R Aartojarvi,et al.  Final report of the specialist committee on validation of waterjet test procedures , 2002 .

[11]  Daniele Peri,et al.  Single- and multiobjective design optimization of a fast multihull ship: numerical and experimental results , 2011 .

[12]  Pablo M. Carrica,et al.  Suggar++: An Improved General Overset Grid Assembly Capability , 2009 .

[13]  Frederick Stern,et al.  An unsteady single‐phase level set method for viscous free surface flows , 2007 .

[14]  Frederick Stern,et al.  RANS simulation of a container ship using a single-phase level-set method with overset grids and the prognosis for extension to a self-propulsion simulator , 2006 .

[15]  Frederick Stern,et al.  Computational Towing Tank Procedures for Single Run Curves of Resistance and Propulsion , 2008 .

[16]  van Bpm Bart Esch,et al.  Fully Transient CFD Analysis of Waterjet Pumps , 2006, Day 1 Tue, September 12, 2006.

[17]  David R. Lavis,et al.  Compact waterjets for high-speed ships , 2006 .

[18]  Jun Shao,et al.  Quantitative V&V of CFD simulations and certification of CFD codes , 2006 .

[19]  Ho-Hwan Chun,et al.  Comparison of waterjet performance in tracked vehicles by impeller diameter , 2009 .

[20]  Daniele Peri,et al.  Numerical optimization methods for ship hydrodynamic design , 2010 .

[21]  N.W.H. Bulten,et al.  Numerical analysis of a waterjet propulsion system , 2006 .

[22]  T. Xing,et al.  Factors of Safety for Richardson Extrapolation , 2010 .