In the reporting of a situation or event, a speaker can sometimes be seen to have omitted or ‘glossed over’ a constituent component. There are times when that component is something a speaker would rather not have the coparticipant know. Sometimes, however, the speaker is willing, indeed eager, to share this material with the coparticipant, but is constrained from simply producing it then and there (the matter being possibly bizarre, risque, or in other ways problematic). In either case, whether the problematic component is delivered or not (i.e., whether a ‘gloss’ is ‘unpackaged’) can depend upon what the coparticipant does. This report focuses on the ways in which a coparticipant's activities are implicated in the maintaining as-is, or unpackaging, of a ‘glossed’ component. (Sociology, psychology, ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, sociolinguistics)
[1]
J. M. Atkinson.
Structures of Social Action: Contents
,
1985
.
[2]
G. Jefferson,et al.
The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service encounter’
,
1981
.
[3]
Anita M. Pomerantz,et al.
Telling My Side: “Limited Access’ as a “Fishing” Device
,
1980
.
[4]
Gail Jefferson,et al.
Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens “Yeah”; and “Mm Hm”;
,
1984
.
[5]
Harvey Sacks,et al.
Structures of Social Action: On doing “being ordinary”
,
1985
.
[6]
E. Schegloff,et al.
Notes on Laughter in the Pursuit of Intimacy
,
1987
.