A system design framework for the integration of public preferences into the design of large infrastructure projects

Abstract Large infrastructure projects such as new roads, railways and nuclear plants have often suffered from public opposition, causing significant delays and costs. In many cases poor engagement between the supporters of construction and the public have contributed to this. Therefore, this paper proposes a novel design framework with the aim of improving public engagement at an early design stage. Following a modified quality function deployment (QFD) process, it enables incorporation of public preferences into the design process, thus helping to improve the social acceptability of large infrastructure projects and reduce costs related to opposition and delays. The application of the framework is illustrated by a case study related to design of nuclear power plants.

[1]  Douglas Schuler,et al.  Participatory Design: Principles and Practices , 1993 .

[2]  Martin J. Goodfellow.  A Participatory Design Framework: Incorporating Public Views into the Design of Nuclear Power Plants , 2013 .

[3]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Acceptance of nuclear power: The Fukushima effect , 2013 .

[4]  Kanika Gauba.  Nuclear regulatory processes in India: a review of public engagement , 2013 .

[5]  J. Lamarsh.  Introduction to Nuclear Engineering , 1975 .

[6]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  An integrated sustainability decision-support framework Part II: Problem analysis , 2005 .

[7]  Daniel T Ingersoll,et al.  Deliberately Small Reactors and the Second Nuclear Era , 2009 .

[8]  George Ellwood Dieter,et al.  Engineering Design: A Materials and Processing Approach , 1983 .

[9]  Giorgio Locatelli,et al.  Economic features of integral, modular, small-to-medium size reactors , 2010 .

[10]  Bryan Tilt,et al.  Social impacts of large dam projects: a comparison of international case studies and implications for best practice. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  Maria Powell,et al.  Meaningful Citizen Engagement in Science and Technology , 2008 .

[12]  Wolter J. Fabrycky,et al.  Systems engineering and analysis , 1981 .

[13]  Louise Gallagher,et al.  Protest responses and community attitudes toward accepting compensation to host waste disposal infrastructure , 2010 .

[14]  Finn Kensing,et al.  Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[15]  Donatella Della Porta,et al.  CHANGING FORMS OF ENVIRONMENTALISM IN ITALY: THE PROTEST CAMPAIGN ON THE HIGH SPEED RAILWAY SYSTEM. , 2002 .

[16]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Sustainability indicators for the assessment of nuclear power , 2011 .

[17]  A. Chattopadhyay,et al.  Heat and thermodynamics , 1952 .

[18]  Ming-Lu Wu,et al.  Quality function deployment: A literature review , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  R. Cowan.  Nuclear Power Reactors: A Study in Technological Lock-in , 1990, The Journal of Economic History.