Prospective comparison of MR enteroclysis with multidetector spiral-CT enteroclysis: interobserver agreement and sensitivity by means of "sign-by-sign" correlation

Abstract. Our objective was a prospective comparison of MR enteroclysis (MRE) with multidetector spiral-CT enteroclysis (MSCTE). Fifty patients with various suspected small bowel diseases were investigated by MSCTE and MRE. The MSCTE was performed using slices of 2.5 mm, immediately followed by MRE, obtaining T1- and T2-weighted sequences, including gadolinium-enhanced acquisition with fat saturation. Three radiologists independently evaluated MSCTE and MRE searching for 12 pathological signs. Interobserver agreement was calculated. Sensitivities and specificities resulted from comparison with pathological results (n=29) and patient's clinical evolution (n=21). Most pathological signs, such as bowel wall thickening (BWT), bowel wall enhancement (BWE) and lymphadenopathy (ADP), showed better interobserver agreement on MSCTE than on MRE (BWT: 0.65 vs 0.48; BWE: 0.51 vs 0.37; ADP: 0.52 vs 0.15). Sensitivity of MSCTE was higher than that of MRE in detecting BWT (88.9 vs 60%), BWE (78.6 vs 55.5%) and ADP (63.8 vs 14.3%). Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed significantly better sensitivity of MSCTE than that of MRE for each observer (p=0.028, p=0.046, p=0.028, respectively). Taking the given study design into account, MSCTE provides better sensitivity in detecting lesions of the small bowel than MRE, with higher interobserver agreement.

[1]  D. Lomas,et al.  Small bowel MRI using water as a contrast medium. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  R. Semelka,et al.  Crohn's disease. Pilot study comparing MRI of the abdomen with clinical evaluation. , 1995, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[3]  J. Timmons,et al.  Computed tomographic enteroclysis: one methodology. , 1996, Investigative radiology.

[4]  A. Aschoff,et al.  MRI in the diagnosis of small bowel disease: use of positive and negative oral contrast media in combination with enteroclysis , 2000, European Radiology.

[5]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[6]  D. Szolar,et al.  Small-bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. , 2000, Radiology.

[7]  B. Siewert,et al.  CT of the acute abdomen: findings and impact on diagnosis and treatment. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  I. Francis,et al.  Crohn's disease evaluation: Comparison of contrast‐enhanced MR imaging and single‐phase helical CT scanning , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  Principles of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Angiography , 1999 .

[10]  Y. Ozaki,et al.  MR imaging of the small bowel using water as a contrast agent in a preliminary study with healthy volunteers. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  Z. Traill,et al.  The current role of the barium examination of the small intestine. , 1997, Clinical radiology.

[12]  F. Kelvin,et al.  MR enteroclysis: the future of small-bowel imaging? , 2000, Radiology.

[13]  H. Brambs,et al.  MR-Enteroklyse zur kernspintomographischen Diagnostik entzündlicher Darmerkrankungen mit verbesserter Darmkontrastierung , 1997 .

[14]  S. Mirowitz.  Contrast enhancement of the gastrointestinal tract on MR images using intravenous gadolinium-DTPA , 1993, Abdominal Radiology.

[15]  D. Maglinte,et al.  CT enteroclysis: a superfluous diagnostic procedure or valuable when investigating small-bowel disease? , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  R. Semelka,et al.  Small bowel neoplastic disease: Demonstration by MRI , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  D. Nolan.  The True Yield of the Small-Intestinal Barium Study , 1997, Endoscopy.

[18]  N. Gourtsoyiannis,et al.  MR Imaging of the Small Bowel with a True-FISP Sequence After Enteroclysis with Water Solution , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[19]  J. Debatin,et al.  MRI of the small and large bowel , 1999, European Radiology.

[20]  T. Asselah,et al.  Breath-hold fast spin-echo MR imaging of Crohn's disease. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  F. Kelvin,et al.  Crohn disease of the small intestine: accuracy and relevance of enteroclysis. , 1992, Radiology.

[22]  I. Francis,et al.  MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  A. Sanyal,et al.  Primary sclerosing cholangitis: evaluation with MR cholangiography-a case-control study. , 2000, Radiology.

[24]  S. Somers,et al.  Interobserver variation in the interpretation of abdominal radiographs. , 1989, Radiology.

[25]  J. Thiele,et al.  [The Sellink CT method]. , 1992, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[26]  K. Oberholzer,et al.  Hydro-MRI in Crohn's disease: appraisal of disease activity. , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[27]  E. Balthazar.  For suspected small-bowel obstruction and an equivocal plain film, should we perform CT or a small-bowel series? , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  Thomas G. Maris,et al.  MR enteroclysis imaging of Crohn disease. , 2001, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[29]  F. Regan,et al.  Fast MR imaging and the detection of small-bowel obstruction. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[30]  C H McCollough,et al.  Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system. , 1999, Medical physics.

[31]  K. Yoon,et al.  Application of MRI for small intestinal diseases. , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[32]  A. Megibow,et al.  The role of radiology in the diagnosis of small-bowel obstruction. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  Thomas G. Maris,et al.  MR enteroclysis protocol optimization: comparison between 3D FLASH with fat saturation after intravenous gadolinium injection and true FISP sequences , 2001, European Radiology.

[34]  R. Semelka,et al.  Bowel disease: Prospective comparison of CT and 1.5‐T pre‐ and postcontrast MR imaging with T1‐weighted fat‐suppressed and breath‐hold FLASH sequences , 1991, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[35]  R. Semelka,et al.  MR imaging of the small bowel using the HASTE sequence. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[36]  C. Kalbhen.  Variants and Pitfalls in Body Imaging , 2000 .