Applying relative equivalent uniform annual benefit for optimum selection of a gas engine combined cooling, heating and power system for residential buildings

Abstract Energy, economic and environmental modeling/analysis were performed to optimize a gas engine CCHP system using Genetic Algorithm (GA) optimization method for residential buildings. Optimization was performed for one and two gas engines for providing specified values of electricity, heating and cooling capacities which were varying during a year. An objective function named Relative Equivalent Uniform Annual Benefit (REUAB) was introduced. The goal, was finding system design parameters such as nominal power of gas engine(s), their partial load during a year, boiler heating capacity and the ratio of electrical cooling capacity (provided by electrical chiller) to the total cooling capacity (provided by both electrical and absorption chillers), to make the objective function (annual system profit) maximized. Results showed a bigger REUAB for one gas engine (284 × 10 3  $/year) in comparison with selecting two gas engines (264.7 × 10 3  $/year). Results of sensitivity analysis for one gas engine CCHP system with increasing equipment and unit energy costs was also reported.

[1]  Rahul Goyal,et al.  Performance and emission analysis of CI engine operated micro-trigeneration system for power, heating and space cooling , 2015 .

[2]  Ali Mostafaeipour,et al.  Economic evaluation for cooling and ventilation of medicine storage warehouses utilizing wind catchers , 2014 .

[3]  Pedro J. Mago,et al.  Analysis and optimization of CCHP systems based on energy, economical, and environmental considerations , 2009 .

[4]  Sheng Li,et al.  Multi-objective optimal operation strategy study of micro-CCHP system , 2012, Energy.

[5]  Pierluigi Mancarella,et al.  Assessment of the Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cogeneration and Trigeneration Systems. Part II: Analysis Techniques and Application Cases , 2008 .

[6]  Ali Keshavarz,et al.  Sizing the prime mover of a residential micro-combined cooling heating and power (CCHP) system by multi-criteria sizing method for different climates , 2013 .

[7]  You-Yin Jing,et al.  Optimization of capacity and operation for CCHP system by genetic algorithm , 2010 .

[8]  Hui Li,et al.  Laboratory research on combined cooling, heating and power (CCHP) systems , 2009 .

[9]  Ali Keshavarz,et al.  Climate impact on the prime mover size and design of a CCHP system for the residential building , 2012 .

[10]  Dilip Sharma,et al.  Micro-trigeneration for energy sustainability: Technologies, tools and trends , 2014 .

[11]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems (Genetic and Evolutionary Computation) , 2006 .

[12]  Sepehr Sanaye,et al.  Estimating the power and number of microturbines in small-scale combined heat and power systems , 2009 .

[13]  Sepehr Sanaye,et al.  Simultaneous use of MRM (maximum rectangle method) and optimization methods in determining nominal capacity of gas engines in CCHP (combined cooling, heating and power) systems , 2014 .

[14]  Antonio Piacentino,et al.  A methodology for sizing a trigeneration plant in mediterranean areas , 2003 .

[15]  Mehdi Aghaei Meybodi,et al.  Selecting the prime movers and nominal powers in combined heat and power systems , 2008 .

[16]  Meherwan P. Boyce,et al.  Handbook for Cogeneration and Combined Cycle Power Plants , 2010 .