Challenges in Deep Vadose Zone Remediation of Metals and Radionuclides-12025

Deep vadose zone contamination is a significant issue facing the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM). Contamination in the deep vadose zone is isolated from exposure such that direct contact is not a factor in risk to human health and the environment. Transport of deep vadose zone contamination and discharge to the groundwater creates the potential for exposure and risk to receptors, so limiting flux to groundwater is key for protection of groundwater resources. Remediation approaches for the deep vadose zone need to be considered within the regulatory context, targeted at mitigating the source of contamination and reducing contaminant flux to groundwater. Processes for deep vadose zone metal and radionuclide remediation are discussed, as well as challenges and opportunities for implementation.

[1]  Daniel Hillel,et al.  Soil and Water: Physical Principles and Processes , 2012 .

[2]  G. B. Chronister,et al.  Field‐Scale Assessment of Desiccation Implementation for Deep Vadose Zone Contaminants , 2012 .

[3]  K. Cantrell,et al.  Review: Technical and policy challenges in deep vadose zone remediation of metals and radionuclides. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Mark D. Williams,et al.  Remediation of Uranium in the Hanford Vadose Zone Using Ammonia Gas: FY 2010 Laboratory-Scale Experiments , 2010 .

[5]  J. A. Schramke,et al.  Evaluation of Soil Flushing for Application to the Deep Vadose Zone in the Hanford Central Plateau , 2010 .

[6]  L. Zhong,et al.  Foam Delivery of Amendments for Vadose Zone Remediation: Propagation Performance in Unsaturated Sediments , 2010 .

[7]  G. B. Chronister,et al.  TECHNICAL BASIS FOR EVALUATING SURFACE BARRIERS TO PROTECT GROUNDWATER FROM DEEP VADOSE ZONE CONTAMINATION , 2010 .

[8]  James E. Szecsody,et al.  Remediation of Uranium in the Hanford Vadose Zone Using Gas-Transported Reactants: Laboratory Scale Experiments in Support of the Deep Vadose Zone Treatability Test Plan for the Hanford Central Plateau , 2010 .

[9]  J. H. Dane,et al.  Desiccation of Unsaturated Porous Media: Intermediate‐Scale Experiments and Numerical Simulation , 2009 .

[10]  E. Pierce,et al.  Sequestration and retention of uranium(VI) in the presence of hydroxylapatite under dynamic geochemical conditions , 2008 .

[11]  A. Ward,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Soil Desiccation for Vadose Zone Remediation: Report for Fiscal Year 2007 , 2008 .

[12]  John M. Zachara,et al.  Geochemical Controls on Contaminant Uranium in Vadose Hanford Formation Sediments at the 200 Area and 300 Area, Hanford Site, Washington , 2007 .

[13]  M. Denham,et al.  Gas: A neglected phase in remediation of metals and radionuclides. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Dawn M. Wellman,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Soluble Phosphate Amendments for the Remediation of Heavy Metal Contaminants: Effect on Sediment Hydraulic Conductivity , 2006 .

[15]  S. Sutton,et al.  Uranyl Incorporation in Natural Calcite , 2003 .

[16]  A. Welch,et al.  Aqueous geochemistry of ground water with high concentrations of Arsenic and Uranium, Carson River Basin, Nevada , 1988 .

[17]  Robert W. Bartlett,et al.  Solution Mining: Leaching and Fluid Recovery of Materials , 1992 .