Constraint Satisfaction Accounts of Lexical and Sentence Comprehension
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al. Parsing in a Dynamical System: An Attractor-based Account of the Interaction of Lexical and Structural Constraints in Sentence Processing , 1997 .
[2] K. Rayner. The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.
[3] Richard L. Lewis,et al. Falsifying Serial and Parallel Parsing Models: Empirical Conundrums and An Overlooked Paradigm , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[4] R N Aslin,et al. Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.
[5] K. Bock. An Effect of the Accessibility of Word Forms on Sentence Structures , 1987 .
[6] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. Modeling Eye Movements in Reading , 2003 .
[7] A. Inhoff,et al. The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[8] Robin K. Morris,et al. Learning new word meanings from context: a study of eye movements. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[9] Janet Dean Fodor,et al. The Mental Representation of Quantifiers , 1982 .
[10] Beatrice Santorini,et al. Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank , 1993, CL.
[11] S. Sereno. Resolution of lexical ambiguity: evidence from an eye movement priming paradigm. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[12] Peter M. Vishton,et al. Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. , 1999, Science.
[13] Roger Ratcliff,et al. "Meaning Through Syntax" in Sentence Production and Comprehension: Reply to McRae et al. (2005) , 2005 .
[14] J. Henderson,et al. Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. , 1990 .
[15] Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al. Dynamical models of sentence processing , 1999, Cogn. Sci..
[16] Simon P. Liversedge,et al. The Influence of Focus Operators on Syntactic Processing of Short Relative Clause Sentences , 1999 .
[17] Jeffrey L. Elman,et al. Sense and structure: Meaning as a determinant of verb subcategorization preferences , 2003 .
[18] J. Kevin O’Regan,et al. The control of saccade size and fixation duration in reading: The limits of linguistic control , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.
[19] Barbara J. Juhasz,et al. The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. , 2003, British journal of psychology.
[20] Thomas G. Bever,et al. Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules , 2001 .
[21] Holly P. Branigan,et al. Processing arguments and adjuncts in isolation and context : The case of by-phrase ambiguities in passives , 1998 .
[22] K. Rayner. Visual attention in reading: Eye movements reflect cognitive processes , 1977, Memory & cognition.
[23] K Rayner,et al. Saccade size in reading depends upon character spaces and not visual angle , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.
[24] R. E. Morrison,et al. Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: evidence for parallel programming of saccades. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[25] K. Rayner. Eye Movements and Cognitive Processes in Reading, Visual Search, and Scene Perception , 1995 .
[26] K. Rayner,et al. Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading , 1981 .
[27] Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al. Two stages of word processing during eye fixations in the reading of prose , 1984 .
[28] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .
[29] K Rayner,et al. Spelling-sound regularity effects on eye fixations in reading , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.
[30] Julie C. Sedivy,et al. Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints , 1995, Cognition.
[31] K. Rayner,et al. Parsing Temporarily Ambiguous Complements , 1987 .
[32] K. Rayner,et al. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.
[33] Robin K. Morris,et al. Focus as a contextual priming mechanism in reading , 1998, Memory & cognition.
[34] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. The effects of root frequency, word frequency, and length on the processing of prefixed English words during reading , 2006, Memory & cognition.
[35] Roger Ratcliff,et al. Meaning through syntax: language comprehension and the reduced relative clause construction. , 2003, Psychological review.
[36] M. Pickering,et al. Adjunct attachment is not a form of lexical ambiguity resolution , 1998 .
[37] M. Pickering,et al. Plausibility and the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies:An Eye-Tracking Study , 1996 .
[38] Daniel C. Richardson,et al. Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing , 2004 .
[39] J. H. Bertera,et al. Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[40] Barbara J. Juhasz,et al. Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.
[41] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. , 2005, Psychological review.
[42] Todd R. Ferretti,et al. Thematic Roles as Verb-specific Concepts , 1997 .
[43] Steven P. Abney,et al. Parsing arguments: Phrase structure and argument structure as determinants of initial parsing decisions. , 1991 .
[44] Scott P. Johnson,et al. Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism , 2002, Cognition.
[45] Mark Steedman,et al. Interaction with context during human sentence processing , 1988, Cognition.
[46] Noam Chomsky,et al. Knowledge of language: its elements and origins , 1981 .
[47] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. Language learning and innateness: Some implications of Compounds Research , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.
[48] Lyn Frazier,et al. Immediate disambiguation of lexically ambiguous words during reading: evidence from eye movements. , 2006, British journal of psychology.
[49] A. H. Kawamoto. Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel distributed processing account. , 1993 .
[50] M. H. Kelly,et al. Inferring gender from name phonology. , 1999 .
[51] Robin K. Morris,et al. Multiple lexical codes in reading: Evidence from eye movements, naming time, and oral reading. , 1995 .
[52] Robin K. Morris,et al. Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: effects of prior encounter and discourse topic. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[53] Walter Kintsch,et al. Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .
[54] K. Rayner. Eye Guidance in Reading: Fixation Locations within Words , 1979, Perception.
[55] S. Andrews,et al. Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap , 2004 .
[56] K. Rayner,et al. Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.
[57] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[58] Ralf Engbert,et al. Fixation durations before word skipping in reading , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[59] Lyn Frazier,et al. The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences , 1983 .
[60] Michael J. Spivey,et al. Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[61] C. Clifton,et al. Plausibility and argument structure in sentence comprehension , 1998, Memory & cognition.
[62] Robin K. Morris,et al. Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[63] Lyn Frazier,et al. Carving up word meaning: Portioning and grinding , 2005 .
[64] James L. McClelland,et al. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.
[65] Ralf Engbert,et al. Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading , 2004 .
[66] K. Rayner,et al. Effects of contextual predictability and transitional probability on eye movements during reading. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[67] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control , 1998, Vision Research.
[68] G. McConkie,et al. Eye movements during reading: a theory of saccade initiation times , 2001, Vision Research.
[69] Frederick Hayes-Roth,et al. The state of knowledge-based systems , 1994, CACM.
[70] John M. Henderson,et al. EVIDENCE FOR THE USE OF PHONOLOGICAL REPRESENTATIONS DURING TRANSSACCADIC WORD RECOGNITION , 1995 .
[71] C. Clifton,et al. The prosodic property of lexical stress affects eye movements during silent reading , 2005, Cognition.
[72] Keith Rayner,et al. Eye movements in reading: Old questions and new directions , 2004 .
[73] Mary Hare,et al. Understanding and producing the reduced relative construction: Evidence from ratings, editing and corpora. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.
[74] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence from an eyemovement-contingent display change study , 2004, Memory & cognition.
[75] P. Carpenter,et al. Lexical retrieval and error recovery in reading: A model based on eye fixations , 1981 .
[76] Weijia Ni,et al. Sidestepping garden paths: Assessing the contributions of syntax, semantics and plausibility in resolving ambiguities , 1996 .
[77] Simon P. Liversedge,et al. Parsing with focus particles in context: Eye movements during the processing of relative clause ambiguities , 2005 .
[78] James L. McClelland,et al. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.
[79] K. Rayner,et al. Eye movements during reading: some current controversies , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[80] C. Clifton,et al. Overt reanalysis strategies and eye movements during the reading of mild garden path sentences , 2002, Memory & cognition.
[81] G. Simpson. Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity , 1981 .
[82] D. Balota,et al. Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. , 1986, Canadian journal of psychology.
[83] Gary E. Raney,et al. Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[84] K. Rayner,et al. Punctuation and intonation effects on clause and sentence wrap-up: Evidence from eye movements , 2006 .
[85] Weijia Ni,et al. Readers' Eye Movements Distinguish Anomalies of Form and Content , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[86] Barbara J. Juhasz,et al. The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[87] Karl G. D. Bailey,et al. Good-Enough Representations in Language Comprehension , 2002 .
[88] Barbara J. Juhasz,et al. The effect of word predictability on the eye movements of Chinese readers , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[89] Susan A Duffy,et al. Violating stereotypes: Eye movements and comprehension processes when text conflicts with world knowledge , 2004, Memory & cognition.
[90] S. D. Lima,et al. Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: effects of word-initial letter sequence. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[91] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. The role of semantic transparency in the processing of Finnish compound words , 2005 .
[92] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. E–Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading , 2006, Cognitive Systems Research.
[93] Simon P Liversedge,et al. Thematic processing of adjuncts: Evidence from an eye-tracking experiment , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[94] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Evidence for Multiple Stages in the Processing of Ambiguous Words in Syntactic Contexts. , 1979 .
[95] K. Rayner,et al. Eye Movements and Anaphor Resolution: Effects of Antecedent Typicality and Distance , 1990, Language and speech.
[96] K. Rayner,et al. Representing syllable information during silent reading: Evidence from eye movements , 2004 .
[97] R. Shillcock,et al. Low-level predictive inference in reading: the influence of transitional probabilities on eye movements , 2003, Vision Research.
[98] K Rayner,et al. Regressive eye movements and sentence parsing: On the use of regression-contingent analyses , 1994, Memory & cognition.
[99] R H S Carpenter,et al. An anatomically constrained, stochastic model of eye movement control in reading. , 2005, Psychological review.
[100] Keith Rayner,et al. Initial Fixation Location Effects in Reading Hebrew Words , 1999 .
[101] Rebecca L. Johnson,et al. The flexibility of letter coding: Nonadjacent letter transposition effects in the parafovea , 2007 .
[102] Alan K. Mackworth. Consistency in Networks of Relations , 1977, Artif. Intell..
[103] Keith Rayner,et al. Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[104] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[105] A. Kennedy,et al. The influence of parafoveal typographical errors on eye movements in reading , 2004 .
[106] M. Just,et al. From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .
[107] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[108] Asifa Majid,et al. Antecedent frequency effects during the processing of pronouns , 2004, Cognition.
[109] Gerry T. M. Altmann,et al. Regression-contingent analyses of eye movements during sentence processing: Reply to Rayner and Sereno , 1994 .
[110] Christina L. Gagné,et al. Influence of Thematic Relations on the Comprehension of Modifier–noun Combinations , 1997 .
[111] Jenny R. Saffran,et al. Does Grammar Start Where Statistics Stop? , 2002, Science.
[112] M. Slowiaczek,et al. Constraints on semantic priming in reading: A fixation time analysis , 1986, Memory & cognition.
[113] Gary E. Raney,et al. Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text. , 1995, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[114] Robin K. Morris,et al. Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[115] Barbara J. Juhasz,et al. The influence of semantic transparency on eye movements during English compound word recognition , 2007 .
[116] Martin J. Pickering,et al. Evidence against the use of subcategorisation frequency in the processing of unbounded dependencies , 2003 .
[117] Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al. Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults , 1999, Cognition.
[118] K. Rayner,et al. Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements , 2000, Memory & cognition.
[119] J. Elman. Representation and structure in connectionist models , 1991 .
[120] K. Rayner,et al. Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: investigating the subordinate-bias effect. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[121] Erik D. Reichle,et al. Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.
[122] Toben H. Mintz. Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech , 2003, Cognition.
[123] G. Kambe,et al. Parafoveal processing of prefixed words during eye fixations in reading: Evidence against morphological influences on parafoveal preprocessing , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.
[124] Keith Rayner,et al. Regression-contingent analyses: A reply to Altmann , 1994 .
[125] K. Rayner,et al. Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[126] Susan M. Garnsey,et al. The Contributions of Verb Bias and Plausibility to the Comprehension of Temporarily Ambiguous Sentences , 1997 .
[127] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[128] Ralph Radach,et al. Eye movements in reading : are two eyes better than one? , 1999 .
[129] J. Henderson,et al. Eye movement control during reading: fixation measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[130] Alan Garnham,et al. Late Closure in Context , 1998 .
[131] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. The use of "that" in the Production and Comprehension of Object Relative Clauses , 2003 .
[132] Jeffrey L. Elman,et al. Cues, Constraints, and Competition in Sentence Processing , 2004 .
[133] K. Rayner,et al. Eye Movement Control during Reading: Evidence for Direct Control , 1981, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[134] James L. McClelland,et al. Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .
[135] Ralf Engbert,et al. Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect , 2005, Vision Research.
[136] Ronan G. Reilly,et al. Chapter 21 – Foundations of an Interactive Activation Model of Eye Movement Control in Reading , 2003 .
[137] Keith Rayner,et al. On the Processing of Meaning from Parafoveal Vision During Eye Fixations in Reading , 2003 .
[138] K. Rayner,et al. Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.
[139] Katherine S Binder,et al. Sentential and discourse topic effects on lexical ambiguity processing: An eye movement examination , 2003, Memory & cognition.
[140] W D Marslen-Wilson,et al. Sentence Perception as an Interactive Parallel Process , 1975, Science.
[141] I. Fischler,et al. Automatic and attentional processes in the effects of sentence contexts on word recognition , 1979 .
[142] Roger P. G. van Gompel,et al. Reanalysis in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Current Constraint-Based and Two-Stage Models , 2001 .
[143] A Pollatsek,et al. Phonological codes and eye movements in reading. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[144] Lyn Frazier,et al. ON COMPREHENDING SENTENCES: SYNTACTIC PARSING STRATEGIES. , 1979 .
[145] K. Rayner,et al. The Effect of Meaning Frequency on Processing Lexically Ambiguous Words: Evidence from Eye Fixations , 1992 .
[146] James L. McClelland,et al. On learning the past-tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing , 1986 .
[147] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[148] Katherine S. Binder,et al. The effects of thematic fit and discourse context on syntactic ambiguity resolution , 2001 .
[149] Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al. Semantic effects on syntactic ambiguity resolution: Evidence for a constraint-based resolution process. , 1994 .
[150] Martin J. Pickering,et al. Coercion in sentence processing: evidence from eye-movements and self-paced reading , 2002 .
[151] Maryellen C MacDonald,et al. Where does gender come from? Evidence from a complex inflectional system , 2005, Language and cognitive processes.
[152] Keith Rayner,et al. Inhibition of saccade return in reading , 2003, Vision Research.
[153] Terry C. Lansdown,et al. The mind's eye: cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research , 2005 .
[154] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Reassessing Working Memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996) , 2002 .
[155] D. Mitchell,et al. Absence of real evidence against competition during syntactic ambiguity resolution , 2006 .
[156] Adrian Staub,et al. Eye movements and on-line comprehension processes , 2007 .
[157] Jerome L. Myers,et al. Elaborative inferences during reading: do they occur on-line? , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[158] Manuel Perea,et al. Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[159] Aravind K. Joshi,et al. Natural language parsing: Tree adjoining grammars: How much context-sensitivity is required to provide reasonable structural descriptions? , 1985 .
[160] Joël Pynte,et al. Reading as a Perceptual Process , 2000 .
[161] Douglas Roland,et al. Verb Sense and Verb Subcategorization Probabilities , 2001 .
[162] Ma Conway,et al. Handbook of perception and cognition , 1996 .
[163] P. W. Kerr,et al. Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words , 1987, Vision Research.
[164] Shelia M. Kennison,et al. Comprehending Noun Phrase Arguments and Adjuncts , 2002 .
[165] Sarah J. White,et al. The influence of parafoveal word length and contextual constraint on fixation durations and word skipping in reading , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[166] Erik D. Reichle,et al. Modeling the effects of lexical ambiguity on eye movements during reading , 2007 .
[167] Eyal M. Reingold,et al. Time course of phonological activation during reading: Evidence from eye fixations. , 1995 .
[168] Marcel Adam Just,et al. 17 – What Your Eyes Do while Your Mind Is Reading1 , 1983 .
[169] Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al. Complex compounds in German: Interword spaces facilitate segmentation but hinder assignment of meaning , 2000 .
[170] Nick Chater,et al. Toward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance , 1999 .
[171] Keith Rayner,et al. The role of interword spaces in the processing of English compound words , 2005 .
[172] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. The appeal of parallel distributed processing , 1986 .
[173] Vincent Gautier,et al. PII: S0042-6989(00)00089-4 , 2000 .
[174] Keith Rayner,et al. The orthographic uniqueness point and eye movements during reading. , 2006, British journal of psychology.
[175] M. Pickering,et al. Processing ambiguous verbs: evidence from eye movements. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[176] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension , 1998 .
[177] K. Rayner,et al. Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[178] G. Legge,et al. Mr. Chips: An ideal-observer model of reading , 1997 .
[179] Robin K. Morris,et al. Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading , 1988 .
[180] Nick Chater,et al. Distributional Information: A Powerful Cue for Acquiring Syntactic Categories , 1998, Cogn. Sci..
[181] K. Rayner,et al. Resolution of syntactic category ambiguities: Eye movements in parsing lexically ambiguous sentences☆ , 1987 .
[182] H. H. Clark,et al. Psychology and language : an introduction to psycholinguistics , 1979 .
[183] M J Pickering,et al. Strategies for processing unbounded dependencies: lexical information and verb-argument assignment. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[184] Beth Levin,et al. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation , 1993 .
[185] Simon Garrod,et al. The Contribution of Lexical and Situational Knowledge to Resolving Discourse Roles: Bonding and Resolution , 2000 .
[186] Paul Kaegbein,et al. Methods in reading research , 1991 .
[187] K. Rayner,et al. Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.
[188] Julie C. Sedivy,et al. Invoking Discourse-Based Contrast Sets and Resolving Syntactic Ambiguities ☆ , 2002 .
[189] E. Reingold,et al. What eye fixations tell us about phonological recoding during reading. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[190] G. McConkie,et al. Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading? , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.
[191] T Ishida,et al. Temporal properties of information extraction in reading studied by a text-mask replacement technique. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.
[192] Simon P. Liversedge,et al. Eye movements when reading disappearing text: The importance of the word to the right of fixation , 2006, Vision Research.
[193] Xuejun Bai,et al. The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers. , 2006, British journal of psychology.
[194] Keith Rayner,et al. Reading Disappearing Text , 2003, Psychological science.
[195] John M. Findlay,et al. Binocular coordination of eye movements during reading , 2006, Vision Research.
[196] A Pollatsek,et al. Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: Evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.
[197] K. Rayner,et al. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998 .
[198] M. H. Kelly,et al. Using sound to solve syntactic problems: the role of phonology in grammatical category assignments. , 1992, Psychological review.
[199] J. O'Regan,et al. Fixation location effects on fixation durations during reading: an inverted optimal viewing position effect , 2001, Vision Research.
[200] W. Becker,et al. An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli , 1979, Vision Research.
[201] F. Vitu,et al. The influence of parafoveal preprocessing and linguistic context on the optimal landing position effect , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.
[202] C. Clifton,et al. The independence of syntactic processing , 1986 .
[203] J. Elman,et al. A basis for generating expectancies for verbs from nouns , 2005, Memory & cognition.
[204] S. Kennison. Limitations on the use of verb information during sentence comprehension , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[205] K. Rayner. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.
[206] Alan Kennedy,et al. Parafoveal Processing in Word Recognition , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[207] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words. , 2008, British journal of psychology.
[208] Martin J. Pickering,et al. Context effects in coercion: Evidence from eye movements , 2005 .
[209] Donna Jo Napoli,et al. Linguistic theory in America : the first quarter-century of transformational generative grammar , 1981 .
[210] L Frazier,et al. Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[211] M. Pitt,et al. Lexical activation (and other factors) can mediate compensation for coarticulation , 2003 .
[212] Katherine S. Binder,et al. Contextual strength does not modulate the subordinate bias effect: Evidence from eye fixations and self-paced reading , 1998 .
[213] W. Estes. Statistical theory of distributional phenomena in learning. , 1955, Psychological review.
[214] M. G. Calvo,et al. Eye Movements and Processing Stages in Reading: Relative Contribution of Visual, Lexical, and Contextual Factors , 2002, The Spanish Journal of Psychology.
[215] K. Rayner,et al. Eye movements in reading words and sentences , 2007 .
[216] K. Rayner,et al. Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: eye movements and immediacy of processing , 1983 .
[217] Robin K. Morris,et al. Effects of syntactic category assignment on lexical ambiguity resolution in reading: An eye movement analysis , 2003, Memory & cognition.
[218] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .
[219] M. Pickering,et al. Evidence against competition during syntactic ambiguity resolution. , 2005 .
[220] Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al. Modeling Thematic and Discourse Context Effects with a Multiple Constraints Approach: Implications for the Architecture of the Language Comprehension System , 1999 .
[221] R. Peereman,et al. Learning Nonadjacent Dependencies: No Need for Algebraic-like Computations Is It Possible to Learn the Relation between 2 Nonadjacent Events? , 2004 .
[222] P. Sturt,et al. The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution , 2003 .
[223] K. Rayner,et al. Eye movement control in reading: word predictability has little influence on initial landing positions in words , 2001, Vision Research.
[224] G. McConkie,et al. Integrating information across eye movements , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[225] G. Legge,et al. Mr. Chips 2002: new insights from an ideal-observer model of reading , 2002, Vision Research.
[226] A Pollatsek,et al. The use of information below fixation in reading and in visual search. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[227] Robert W. Kentridge,et al. Eye movements when reading disappearing text: is there a gap effect in reading? , 2004, Vision Research.
[228] K Rayner,et al. Reading without a fovea. , 1979, Science.
[229] D. G. MacKay. The Problems of Flexibility, Fluency, and Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off in Skilled Behavior. , 1982 .
[230] D. Balota,et al. The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.
[231] Robin K. Morris,et al. The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited , 2003 .
[232] B. MacWhinney,et al. Functionalism and the competition model , 1989 .
[233] C. Clifton,et al. Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: implications for eye movement control. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[234] W Ni,et al. Anomaly Detection: Eye Movement Patterns , 1998, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[235] Sébastien Miellet,et al. Activation of Phonological Codes during Reading: Evidence from Errors Detection and Eye Movements , 2002, Brain and Language.
[236] Michael K Tanenhaus,et al. Meaning through syntax is insufficient to explain comprehension of sentences with reduced relative clauses: comment on McKoon and Ratcliff (2003). , 2005, Psychological review.
[237] A Pollatsek,et al. Covert Attention and Eye Movements during Reading , 1989, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[238] S. Garrod,et al. The Role of Different Types of Anaphor in the On-Line Resolution of Sentences in a Discourse , 1994 .
[239] A. Garnham,et al. Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context , 1992 .
[240] M. Tinker,et al. Reliability and validity of eye-movement measures of reading. , 1936 .
[241] Robin K. Morris,et al. Eye movement guidance in reading: the role of parafoveal letter and space information. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[242] A. Kennedy,et al. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading , 2005, Vision Research.
[243] Erik D. Reichle,et al. Eye movement control in reading: accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model , 1999, Vision Research.
[244] Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al. Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Are word access codes used to integrate lexical information across interword fixations? , 1989 .
[245] Keith Rayner,et al. Local and global sources of contextual facilitation in reading , 1987 .
[246] K. Rayner,et al. Extraction of information to the left of the fixated word in reading. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[247] Keith Rayner,et al. Eye Movements of Highly Skilled and Average Readers: Differential Effects of Frequency and Predictability , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[248] Robin L. Hill,et al. Chapter 22 – Commas and Spaces: Effects of Punctuation on Eye Movements and Sentence Parsing , 2000 .
[249] K Rayner,et al. The role of phonology in the activation of word meanings during reading: evidence from proofreading and eye movements. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[250] J. Trueswell. THE ROLE OF LEXICAL FREQUENCY IN SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION , 1996 .
[251] James L. McClelland,et al. Learning and Applying Contextual Constraints in Sentence Comprehension , 1990, Artif. Intell..
[252] Lyn Frazier,et al. Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .
[253] Jerome L. Myers,et al. Semantic and Episodic Effects on Bridging Inferences , 2000 .
[254] Robin K. Morris,et al. Eye movements, word familiarity, and vocabulary acquisition , 2004 .
[255] Robin K. Morris,et al. Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: effects of prior encounter and discourse topic. , 1995 .
[256] John C. Trueswell,et al. Tense, Temporal Context, and Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution. , 1991 .
[257] R. Schvaneveldt,et al. Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.
[258] K. Rayner. Eye movements in reading and information processing. , 1978, Psychological bulletin.
[259] E. J. O'Brien,et al. Elaborative inferencing as an active or passive process. , 1990 .
[260] G. McConkie,et al. What guides a reader's eye movements? , 1976, Vision Research.
[261] A. Pollatsek,et al. Reading Finnish compound words: eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[262] Susan A. Duffy,et al. Effects of Prior Encounter and Global Discourse Bias on the Processing of Lexically Ambiguous Words: Evidence From Eye Fixations , 1994 .
[263] Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al. Integrating information across fixations during reading: The use of orthographic bodies and of exterior letters. , 1995 .
[264] J. Kroll,et al. The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times , 1996, Memory & cognition.
[265] S. Liversedge,et al. Saccadic eye movements and cognition , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[266] Myrna F. Schwartz,et al. Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics , 1983, Cognition.
[267] J. Hyönä,et al. The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds , 2003 .
[268] A. Pollatsek,et al. The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[269] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects in reading: Evidence from Hebrew , 2005 .
[270] D. Swinney. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .
[271] R. Shillcock,et al. Eye Movements Reveal the On-Line Computation of Lexical Probabilities During Reading , 2003, Psychological science.
[272] Jerome L. Myers,et al. Processing discourse roles in scripted narratives: The influences of context and world knowledge , 2004 .
[273] Hilary Putnam,et al. Reductionism and the nature of psychology , 1973 .
[274] Stephen Dopkins,et al. Lexical ambiguity and eye fixations in reading: A test of competing models of lexical ambiguity resolution , 1992 .
[275] Susan M. Garnsey,et al. Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .
[276] E. Gibson. Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.
[277] E. J. O'Brien,et al. Processes involved in the resolution of explicit anaphors , 1997 .
[278] G. McConkie,et al. The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .
[279] Lyn Frazier,et al. Taking on semantic commitments: Processing multiple meanings vs. multiple senses ☆ , 1990 .
[280] M. Just,et al. Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.
[281] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. Eye movement control in reading: The role of word boundaries. , 1982 .
[282] R. Sperber,et al. Differences in semantic encoding as a function of reading comprehension skill , 1981, Memory & cognition.
[283] D. Balota,et al. Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.
[284] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. , 2004, Psychological review.
[285] A. R. Schmauder,et al. The influence of semantic fit on on-line sentence processing , 1998, Memory & cognition.
[286] George W. McConkie,et al. Saccade generation during reading: Are words necessary? , 2004 .
[287] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. Resolution of quantifier scope ambiguities , 1993, Cognition.
[288] Wayne S. Murray,et al. Early, Mandatory, Pragmatic Processing , 1998 .
[289] Marina Nespor,et al. Signal-Driven Computations in Speech Processing , 2002, Science.
[290] Ralf Engbert,et al. A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing , 2002, Vision Research.
[291] Keith Rayner,et al. Binocular Coordination of the Eyes during Reading: Word Frequency and Case Alternation Affect Fixation Duration but not Fixation Disparity , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[292] M A Just,et al. A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.
[293] J. Folk,et al. Phonological codes are used to access the lexicon during silent reading. , 1999 .
[294] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. The emergence of grammaticality in connectionist networks. , 1999 .
[295] Keith Rayner,et al. Eye movements and phonological parafoveal preview: effects of reading skill. , 2005, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[296] Lyn Frazier,et al. Getting There (Slowly) , 1998 .
[297] K. Rayner,et al. Linguistic focus affects eye movements during reading , 1997, Memory & cognition.
[298] G. Simpson,et al. Selective access of homograph meanings in sentence context , 1991 .
[299] Shelia M Kenniso. Comprehending noun phrase arguments and adjuncts. , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.