Constraint Satisfaction Accounts of Lexical and Sentence Comprehension

Publisher Summary This chapter focuses on two types of ambiguity: lexical and syntactic ambiguity. The two kinds of ambiguity can interact—for example, adopting noun vs. verb interpretation of man affects how one interprets the syntactic structure of a sentence containing this word. Despite the close relationship between these two types of ambiguity, for much of the history of modern psycholinguistics they have been studied independently. This division reflected differing views about lexical and syntactic representations. The meanings and other properties of words have often been thought to be stored in the lexicon, a person's mental dictionary. On this view, interpreting words involves looking up, or accessing, information in the lexicon. This process is thought to be autonomous, proceeding in the same way regardless of the context in which a word occurred. It is also thought to make minimal demands on limited capacity working memory and attentional resources, allowing multiple meanings of words to be accessed in parallel. This led to a two-stage model of lexical ambiguity resolution. In the first stage, the lexical system accessed the common meaning or meanings of words; in the second stage, information derived from the linguistic and extra-linguistic contexts and the comprehender's background knowledge are used to select the appropriate meaning and integrate it into the developing representation of the sentence.

[1]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Parsing in a Dynamical System: An Attractor-based Account of the Interaction of Lexical and Structural Constraints in Sentence Processing , 1997 .

[2]  K. Rayner The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Falsifying Serial and Parallel Parsing Models: Empirical Conundrums and An Overlooked Paradigm , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[4]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[5]  K. Bock An Effect of the Accessibility of Word Forms on Sentence Structures , 1987 .

[6]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Modeling Eye Movements in Reading , 2003 .

[7]  A. Inhoff,et al.  The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Learning new word meanings from context: a study of eye movements. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  The Mental Representation of Quantifiers , 1982 .

[10]  Beatrice Santorini,et al.  Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank , 1993, CL.

[11]  S. Sereno Resolution of lexical ambiguity: evidence from an eye movement priming paradigm. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Peter M. Vishton,et al.  Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. , 1999, Science.

[13]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  "Meaning Through Syntax" in Sentence Production and Comprehension: Reply to McRae et al. (2005) , 2005 .

[14]  J. Henderson,et al.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. , 1990 .

[15]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Dynamical models of sentence processing , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  Simon P. Liversedge,et al.  The Influence of Focus Operators on Syntactic Processing of Short Relative Clause Sentences , 1999 .

[17]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Sense and structure: Meaning as a determinant of verb subcategorization preferences , 2003 .

[18]  J. Kevin O’Regan,et al.  The control of saccade size and fixation duration in reading: The limits of linguistic control , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[20]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules , 2001 .

[21]  Holly P. Branigan,et al.  Processing arguments and adjuncts in isolation and context : The case of by-phrase ambiguities in passives , 1998 .

[22]  K. Rayner Visual attention in reading: Eye movements reflect cognitive processes , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[23]  K Rayner,et al.  Saccade size in reading depends upon character spaces and not visual angle , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  R. E. Morrison,et al.  Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: evidence for parallel programming of saccades. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  K. Rayner Eye Movements and Cognitive Processes in Reading, Visual Search, and Scene Perception , 1995 .

[26]  K. Rayner,et al.  Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading , 1981 .

[27]  Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al.  Two stages of word processing during eye fixations in the reading of prose , 1984 .

[28]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[29]  K Rayner,et al.  Spelling-sound regularity effects on eye fixations in reading , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints , 1995, Cognition.

[31]  K. Rayner,et al.  Parsing Temporarily Ambiguous Complements , 1987 .

[32]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Focus as a contextual priming mechanism in reading , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[34]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  The effects of root frequency, word frequency, and length on the processing of prefixed English words during reading , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Meaning through syntax: language comprehension and the reduced relative clause construction. , 2003, Psychological review.

[36]  M. Pickering,et al.  Adjunct attachment is not a form of lexical ambiguity resolution , 1998 .

[37]  M. Pickering,et al.  Plausibility and the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies:An Eye-Tracking Study , 1996 .

[38]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing , 2004 .

[39]  J. H. Bertera,et al.  Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. , 2005, Psychological review.

[42]  Todd R. Ferretti,et al.  Thematic Roles as Verb-specific Concepts , 1997 .

[43]  Steven P. Abney,et al.  Parsing arguments: Phrase structure and argument structure as determinants of initial parsing decisions. , 1991 .

[44]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Visual statistical learning in infancy: evidence for a domain general learning mechanism , 2002, Cognition.

[45]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Interaction with context during human sentence processing , 1988, Cognition.

[46]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Knowledge of language: its elements and origins , 1981 .

[47]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Language learning and innateness: Some implications of Compounds Research , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[48]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Immediate disambiguation of lexically ambiguous words during reading: evidence from eye movements. , 2006, British journal of psychology.

[49]  A. H. Kawamoto Nonlinear dynamics in the resolution of lexical ambiguity: A parallel distributed processing account. , 1993 .

[50]  M. H. Kelly,et al.  Inferring gender from name phonology. , 1999 .

[51]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Multiple lexical codes in reading: Evidence from eye movements, naming time, and oral reading. , 1995 .

[52]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: effects of prior encounter and discourse topic. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[53]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[54]  K. Rayner Eye Guidance in Reading: Fixation Locations within Words , 1979, Perception.

[55]  S. Andrews,et al.  Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap , 2004 .

[56]  K. Rayner,et al.  Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[57]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Fixation durations before word skipping in reading , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[59]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences , 1983 .

[60]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[61]  C. Clifton,et al.  Plausibility and argument structure in sentence comprehension , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[62]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[63]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Carving up word meaning: Portioning and grinding , 2005 .

[64]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[65]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading , 2004 .

[66]  K. Rayner,et al.  Effects of contextual predictability and transitional probability on eye movements during reading. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[67]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control , 1998, Vision Research.

[68]  G. McConkie,et al.  Eye movements during reading: a theory of saccade initiation times , 2001, Vision Research.

[69]  Frederick Hayes-Roth,et al.  The state of knowledge-based systems , 1994, CACM.

[70]  John M. Henderson,et al.  EVIDENCE FOR THE USE OF PHONOLOGICAL REPRESENTATIONS DURING TRANSSACCADIC WORD RECOGNITION , 1995 .

[71]  C. Clifton,et al.  The prosodic property of lexical stress affects eye movements during silent reading , 2005, Cognition.

[72]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Eye movements in reading: Old questions and new directions , 2004 .

[73]  Mary Hare,et al.  Understanding and producing the reduced relative construction: Evidence from ratings, editing and corpora. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[74]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence from an eyemovement-contingent display change study , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[75]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Lexical retrieval and error recovery in reading: A model based on eye fixations , 1981 .

[76]  Weijia Ni,et al.  Sidestepping garden paths: Assessing the contributions of syntax, semantics and plausibility in resolving ambiguities , 1996 .

[77]  Simon P. Liversedge,et al.  Parsing with focus particles in context: Eye movements during the processing of relative clause ambiguities , 2005 .

[78]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[79]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements during reading: some current controversies , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[80]  C. Clifton,et al.  Overt reanalysis strategies and eye movements during the reading of mild garden path sentences , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[81]  G. Simpson Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity , 1981 .

[82]  D. Balota,et al.  Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. , 1986, Canadian journal of psychology.

[83]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[84]  K. Rayner,et al.  Punctuation and intonation effects on clause and sentence wrap-up: Evidence from eye movements , 2006 .

[85]  Weijia Ni,et al.  Readers' Eye Movements Distinguish Anomalies of Form and Content , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[86]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[87]  Karl G. D. Bailey,et al.  Good-Enough Representations in Language Comprehension , 2002 .

[88]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  The effect of word predictability on the eye movements of Chinese readers , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[89]  Susan A Duffy,et al.  Violating stereotypes: Eye movements and comprehension processes when text conflicts with world knowledge , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[90]  S. D. Lima,et al.  Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: effects of word-initial letter sequence. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[91]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  The role of semantic transparency in the processing of Finnish compound words , 2005 .

[92]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  E–Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading , 2006, Cognitive Systems Research.

[93]  Simon P Liversedge,et al.  Thematic processing of adjuncts: Evidence from an eye-tracking experiment , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[94]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Evidence for Multiple Stages in the Processing of Ambiguous Words in Syntactic Contexts. , 1979 .

[95]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye Movements and Anaphor Resolution: Effects of Antecedent Typicality and Distance , 1990, Language and speech.

[96]  K. Rayner,et al.  Representing syllable information during silent reading: Evidence from eye movements , 2004 .

[97]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Low-level predictive inference in reading: the influence of transitional probabilities on eye movements , 2003, Vision Research.

[98]  K Rayner,et al.  Regressive eye movements and sentence parsing: On the use of regression-contingent analyses , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[99]  R H S Carpenter,et al.  An anatomically constrained, stochastic model of eye movement control in reading. , 2005, Psychological review.

[100]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Initial Fixation Location Effects in Reading Hebrew Words , 1999 .

[101]  Rebecca L. Johnson,et al.  The flexibility of letter coding: Nonadjacent letter transposition effects in the parafovea , 2007 .

[102]  Alan K. Mackworth Consistency in Networks of Relations , 1977, Artif. Intell..

[103]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[104]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[105]  A. Kennedy,et al.  The influence of parafoveal typographical errors on eye movements in reading , 2004 .

[106]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[107]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Early morphological effects in reading: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit in Hebrew , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[108]  Asifa Majid,et al.  Antecedent frequency effects during the processing of pronouns , 2004, Cognition.

[109]  Gerry T. M. Altmann,et al.  Regression-contingent analyses of eye movements during sentence processing: Reply to Rayner and Sereno , 1994 .

[110]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Influence of Thematic Relations on the Comprehension of Modifier–noun Combinations , 1997 .

[111]  Jenny R. Saffran,et al.  Does Grammar Start Where Statistics Stop? , 2002, Science.

[112]  M. Slowiaczek,et al.  Constraints on semantic priming in reading: A fixation time analysis , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[113]  Gary E. Raney,et al.  Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text. , 1995, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[114]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[115]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  The influence of semantic transparency on eye movements during English compound word recognition , 2007 .

[116]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Evidence against the use of subcategorisation frequency in the processing of unbounded dependencies , 2003 .

[117]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults , 1999, Cognition.

[118]  K. Rayner,et al.  Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[119]  J. Elman Representation and structure in connectionist models , 1991 .

[120]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: investigating the subordinate-bias effect. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[121]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[122]  Toben H. Mintz Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech , 2003, Cognition.

[123]  G. Kambe,et al.  Parafoveal processing of prefixed words during eye fixations in reading: Evidence against morphological influences on parafoveal preprocessing , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[124]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Regression-contingent analyses: A reply to Altmann , 1994 .

[125]  K. Rayner,et al.  Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[126]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  The Contributions of Verb Bias and Plausibility to the Comprehension of Temporarily Ambiguous Sentences , 1997 .

[127]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[128]  Ralph Radach,et al.  Eye movements in reading : are two eyes better than one? , 1999 .

[129]  J. Henderson,et al.  Eye movement control during reading: fixation measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[130]  Alan Garnham,et al.  Late Closure in Context , 1998 .

[131]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The use of "that" in the Production and Comprehension of Object Relative Clauses , 2003 .

[132]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Cues, Constraints, and Competition in Sentence Processing , 2004 .

[133]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye Movement Control during Reading: Evidence for Direct Control , 1981, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[134]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[135]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect , 2005, Vision Research.

[136]  Ronan G. Reilly,et al.  Chapter 21 – Foundations of an Interactive Activation Model of Eye Movement Control in Reading , 2003 .

[137]  Keith Rayner,et al.  On the Processing of Meaning from Parafoveal Vision During Eye Fixations in Reading , 2003 .

[138]  K. Rayner,et al.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[139]  Katherine S Binder,et al.  Sentential and discourse topic effects on lexical ambiguity processing: An eye movement examination , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[140]  W D Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Sentence Perception as an Interactive Parallel Process , 1975, Science.

[141]  I. Fischler,et al.  Automatic and attentional processes in the effects of sentence contexts on word recognition , 1979 .

[142]  Roger P. G. van Gompel,et al.  Reanalysis in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Current Constraint-Based and Two-Stage Models , 2001 .

[143]  A Pollatsek,et al.  Phonological codes and eye movements in reading. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[144]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  ON COMPREHENDING SENTENCES: SYNTACTIC PARSING STRATEGIES. , 1979 .

[145]  K. Rayner,et al.  The Effect of Meaning Frequency on Processing Lexically Ambiguous Words: Evidence from Eye Fixations , 1992 .

[146]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On learning the past-tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing , 1986 .

[147]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[148]  Katherine S. Binder,et al.  The effects of thematic fit and discourse context on syntactic ambiguity resolution , 2001 .

[149]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Semantic effects on syntactic ambiguity resolution: Evidence for a constraint-based resolution process. , 1994 .

[150]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Coercion in sentence processing: evidence from eye-movements and self-paced reading , 2002 .

[151]  Maryellen C MacDonald,et al.  Where does gender come from? Evidence from a complex inflectional system , 2005, Language and cognitive processes.

[152]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Inhibition of saccade return in reading , 2003, Vision Research.

[153]  Terry C. Lansdown,et al.  The mind's eye: cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research , 2005 .

[154]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Reassessing Working Memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996) , 2002 .

[155]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Absence of real evidence against competition during syntactic ambiguity resolution , 2006 .

[156]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Eye movements and on-line comprehension processes , 2007 .

[157]  Jerome L. Myers,et al.  Elaborative inferences during reading: do they occur on-line? , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[158]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[159]  Aravind K. Joshi,et al.  Natural language parsing: Tree adjoining grammars: How much context-sensitivity is required to provide reasonable structural descriptions? , 1985 .

[160]  Joël Pynte,et al.  Reading as a Perceptual Process , 2000 .

[161]  Douglas Roland,et al.  Verb Sense and Verb Subcategorization Probabilities , 2001 .

[162]  Ma Conway,et al.  Handbook of perception and cognition , 1996 .

[163]  P. W. Kerr,et al.  Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words , 1987, Vision Research.

[164]  Shelia M. Kennison,et al.  Comprehending Noun Phrase Arguments and Adjuncts , 2002 .

[165]  Sarah J. White,et al.  The influence of parafoveal word length and contextual constraint on fixation durations and word skipping in reading , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[166]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Modeling the effects of lexical ambiguity on eye movements during reading , 2007 .

[167]  Eyal M. Reingold,et al.  Time course of phonological activation during reading: Evidence from eye fixations. , 1995 .

[168]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  17 – What Your Eyes Do while Your Mind Is Reading1 , 1983 .

[169]  Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al.  Complex compounds in German: Interword spaces facilitate segmentation but hinder assignment of meaning , 2000 .

[170]  Nick Chater,et al.  Toward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance , 1999 .

[171]  Keith Rayner,et al.  The role of interword spaces in the processing of English compound words , 2005 .

[172]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  The appeal of parallel distributed processing , 1986 .

[173]  Vincent Gautier,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(00)00089-4 , 2000 .

[174]  Keith Rayner,et al.  The orthographic uniqueness point and eye movements during reading. , 2006, British journal of psychology.

[175]  M. Pickering,et al.  Processing ambiguous verbs: evidence from eye movements. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[176]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension , 1998 .

[177]  K. Rayner,et al.  Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[178]  G. Legge,et al.  Mr. Chips: An ideal-observer model of reading , 1997 .

[179]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading , 1988 .

[180]  Nick Chater,et al.  Distributional Information: A Powerful Cue for Acquiring Syntactic Categories , 1998, Cogn. Sci..

[181]  K. Rayner,et al.  Resolution of syntactic category ambiguities: Eye movements in parsing lexically ambiguous sentences☆ , 1987 .

[182]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Psychology and language : an introduction to psycholinguistics , 1979 .

[183]  M J Pickering,et al.  Strategies for processing unbounded dependencies: lexical information and verb-argument assignment. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[184]  Beth Levin,et al.  English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation , 1993 .

[185]  Simon Garrod,et al.  The Contribution of Lexical and Situational Knowledge to Resolving Discourse Roles: Bonding and Resolution , 2000 .

[186]  Paul Kaegbein,et al.  Methods in reading research , 1991 .

[187]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[188]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Invoking Discourse-Based Contrast Sets and Resolving Syntactic Ambiguities ☆ , 2002 .

[189]  E. Reingold,et al.  What eye fixations tell us about phonological recoding during reading. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[190]  G. McConkie,et al.  Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading? , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[191]  T Ishida,et al.  Temporal properties of information extraction in reading studied by a text-mask replacement technique. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[192]  Simon P. Liversedge,et al.  Eye movements when reading disappearing text: The importance of the word to the right of fixation , 2006, Vision Research.

[193]  Xuejun Bai,et al.  The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers. , 2006, British journal of psychology.

[194]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Reading Disappearing Text , 2003, Psychological science.

[195]  John M. Findlay,et al.  Binocular coordination of eye movements during reading , 2006, Vision Research.

[196]  A Pollatsek,et al.  Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: Evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[197]  K. Rayner,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998 .

[198]  M. H. Kelly,et al.  Using sound to solve syntactic problems: the role of phonology in grammatical category assignments. , 1992, Psychological review.

[199]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Fixation location effects on fixation durations during reading: an inverted optimal viewing position effect , 2001, Vision Research.

[200]  W. Becker,et al.  An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli , 1979, Vision Research.

[201]  F. Vitu,et al.  The influence of parafoveal preprocessing and linguistic context on the optimal landing position effect , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[202]  C. Clifton,et al.  The independence of syntactic processing , 1986 .

[203]  J. Elman,et al.  A basis for generating expectancies for verbs from nouns , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[204]  S. Kennison Limitations on the use of verb information during sentence comprehension , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[205]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[206]  Alan Kennedy,et al.  Parafoveal Processing in Word Recognition , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[207]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words. , 2008, British journal of psychology.

[208]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Context effects in coercion: Evidence from eye movements , 2005 .

[209]  Donna Jo Napoli,et al.  Linguistic theory in America : the first quarter-century of transformational generative grammar , 1981 .

[210]  L Frazier,et al.  Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[211]  M. Pitt,et al.  Lexical activation (and other factors) can mediate compensation for coarticulation , 2003 .

[212]  Katherine S. Binder,et al.  Contextual strength does not modulate the subordinate bias effect: Evidence from eye fixations and self-paced reading , 1998 .

[213]  W. Estes Statistical theory of distributional phenomena in learning. , 1955, Psychological review.

[214]  M. G. Calvo,et al.  Eye Movements and Processing Stages in Reading: Relative Contribution of Visual, Lexical, and Contextual Factors , 2002, The Spanish Journal of Psychology.

[215]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements in reading words and sentences , 2007 .

[216]  K. Rayner,et al.  Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: eye movements and immediacy of processing , 1983 .

[217]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Effects of syntactic category assignment on lexical ambiguity resolution in reading: An eye movement analysis , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[218]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[219]  M. Pickering,et al.  Evidence against competition during syntactic ambiguity resolution. , 2005 .

[220]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Modeling Thematic and Discourse Context Effects with a Multiple Constraints Approach: Implications for the Architecture of the Language Comprehension System , 1999 .

[221]  R. Peereman,et al.  Learning Nonadjacent Dependencies: No Need for Algebraic-like Computations Is It Possible to Learn the Relation between 2 Nonadjacent Events? , 2004 .

[222]  P. Sturt,et al.  The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution , 2003 .

[223]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: word predictability has little influence on initial landing positions in words , 2001, Vision Research.

[224]  G. McConkie,et al.  Integrating information across eye movements , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[225]  G. Legge,et al.  Mr. Chips 2002: new insights from an ideal-observer model of reading , 2002, Vision Research.

[226]  A Pollatsek,et al.  The use of information below fixation in reading and in visual search. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[227]  Robert W. Kentridge,et al.  Eye movements when reading disappearing text: is there a gap effect in reading? , 2004, Vision Research.

[228]  K Rayner,et al.  Reading without a fovea. , 1979, Science.

[229]  D. G. MacKay The Problems of Flexibility, Fluency, and Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off in Skilled Behavior. , 1982 .

[230]  D. Balota,et al.  The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[231]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited , 2003 .

[232]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Functionalism and the competition model , 1989 .

[233]  C. Clifton,et al.  Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: implications for eye movement control. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[234]  W Ni,et al.  Anomaly Detection: Eye Movement Patterns , 1998, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[235]  Sébastien Miellet,et al.  Activation of Phonological Codes during Reading: Evidence from Errors Detection and Eye Movements , 2002, Brain and Language.

[236]  Michael K Tanenhaus,et al.  Meaning through syntax is insufficient to explain comprehension of sentences with reduced relative clauses: comment on McKoon and Ratcliff (2003). , 2005, Psychological review.

[237]  A Pollatsek,et al.  Covert Attention and Eye Movements during Reading , 1989, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[238]  S. Garrod,et al.  The Role of Different Types of Anaphor in the On-Line Resolution of Sentences in a Discourse , 1994 .

[239]  A. Garnham,et al.  Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context , 1992 .

[240]  M. Tinker,et al.  Reliability and validity of eye-movement measures of reading. , 1936 .

[241]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Eye movement guidance in reading: the role of parafoveal letter and space information. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[242]  A. Kennedy,et al.  Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading , 2005, Vision Research.

[243]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model , 1999, Vision Research.

[244]  Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al.  Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Are word access codes used to integrate lexical information across interword fixations? , 1989 .

[245]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Local and global sources of contextual facilitation in reading , 1987 .

[246]  K. Rayner,et al.  Extraction of information to the left of the fixated word in reading. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[247]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Eye Movements of Highly Skilled and Average Readers: Differential Effects of Frequency and Predictability , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[248]  Robin L. Hill,et al.  Chapter 22 – Commas and Spaces: Effects of Punctuation on Eye Movements and Sentence Parsing , 2000 .

[249]  K Rayner,et al.  The role of phonology in the activation of word meanings during reading: evidence from proofreading and eye movements. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[250]  J. Trueswell THE ROLE OF LEXICAL FREQUENCY IN SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION , 1996 .

[251]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Learning and Applying Contextual Constraints in Sentence Comprehension , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[252]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[253]  Jerome L. Myers,et al.  Semantic and Episodic Effects on Bridging Inferences , 2000 .

[254]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Eye movements, word familiarity, and vocabulary acquisition , 2004 .

[255]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: effects of prior encounter and discourse topic. , 1995 .

[256]  John C. Trueswell,et al.  Tense, Temporal Context, and Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution. , 1991 .

[257]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[258]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing. , 1978, Psychological bulletin.

[259]  E. J. O'Brien,et al.  Elaborative inferencing as an active or passive process. , 1990 .

[260]  G. McConkie,et al.  What guides a reader's eye movements? , 1976, Vision Research.

[261]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  Reading Finnish compound words: eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[262]  Susan A. Duffy,et al.  Effects of Prior Encounter and Global Discourse Bias on the Processing of Lexically Ambiguous Words: Evidence From Eye Fixations , 1994 .

[263]  Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al.  Integrating information across fixations during reading: The use of orthographic bodies and of exterior letters. , 1995 .

[264]  J. Kroll,et al.  The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[265]  S. Liversedge,et al.  Saccadic eye movements and cognition , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[266]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics , 1983, Cognition.

[267]  J. Hyönä,et al.  The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds , 2003 .

[268]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[269]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Morphological parafoveal preview benefit effects in reading: Evidence from Hebrew , 2005 .

[270]  D. Swinney Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .

[271]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Eye Movements Reveal the On-Line Computation of Lexical Probabilities During Reading , 2003, Psychological science.

[272]  Jerome L. Myers,et al.  Processing discourse roles in scripted narratives: The influences of context and world knowledge , 2004 .

[273]  Hilary Putnam,et al.  Reductionism and the nature of psychology , 1973 .

[274]  Stephen Dopkins,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and eye fixations in reading: A test of competing models of lexical ambiguity resolution , 1992 .

[275]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[276]  E. Gibson Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[277]  E. J. O'Brien,et al.  Processes involved in the resolution of explicit anaphors , 1997 .

[278]  G. McConkie,et al.  The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .

[279]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Taking on semantic commitments: Processing multiple meanings vs. multiple senses ☆ , 1990 .

[280]  M. Just,et al.  Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[281]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: The role of word boundaries. , 1982 .

[282]  R. Sperber,et al.  Differences in semantic encoding as a function of reading comprehension skill , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[283]  D. Balota,et al.  Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[284]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. , 2004, Psychological review.

[285]  A. R. Schmauder,et al.  The influence of semantic fit on on-line sentence processing , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[286]  George W. McConkie,et al.  Saccade generation during reading: Are words necessary? , 2004 .

[287]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Resolution of quantifier scope ambiguities , 1993, Cognition.

[288]  Wayne S. Murray,et al.  Early, Mandatory, Pragmatic Processing , 1998 .

[289]  Marina Nespor,et al.  Signal-Driven Computations in Speech Processing , 2002, Science.

[290]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing , 2002, Vision Research.

[291]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Binocular Coordination of the Eyes during Reading: Word Frequency and Case Alternation Affect Fixation Duration but not Fixation Disparity , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[292]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[293]  J. Folk,et al.  Phonological codes are used to access the lexicon during silent reading. , 1999 .

[294]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  The emergence of grammaticality in connectionist networks. , 1999 .

[295]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Eye movements and phonological parafoveal preview: effects of reading skill. , 2005, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[296]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Getting There (Slowly) , 1998 .

[297]  K. Rayner,et al.  Linguistic focus affects eye movements during reading , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[298]  G. Simpson,et al.  Selective access of homograph meanings in sentence context , 1991 .

[299]  Shelia M Kenniso Comprehending noun phrase arguments and adjuncts. , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.