Role of electrostatic interactions in binding of peptides and intrinsically disordered proteins to their folded targets. 1. NMR and MD characterization of the complex between the c-Crk N-SH3 domain and the peptide Sos.

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) often rely on electrostatic interactions to bind their structured targets. To obtain insight into the mechanism of formation of the electrostatic encounter complex, we investigated the binding of the peptide Sos (PPPVPPRRRR), which serves as a minimal model for an IDP, to the c-Crk N-terminal SH3 domain. Initially, we measured ¹⁵N relaxation rates at two magnetic field strengths and determined the binding shifts for the complex of Sos with wild-type SH3. We have also recorded a 3 μs molecular dynamics (MD) trajectory of this complex using the Amber ff99SB*-ILDN force field. The comparison of the experimental and simulated data shows that MD simulation consistently overestimates the strength of salt bridge interactions at the binding interface. The series of simulations using other advanced force fields also failed to produce any satisfactory results. To address this issue, we have devised an empirical correction to the Amber ff99SB*-ILDN force field whereby the Lennard-Jones equilibrium distance for the nitrogen-oxygen pair across the Arg-to-Asp and Arg-to-Glu salt bridges has been increased by 3%. Implementing this correction resulted in a good agreement between the simulations and the experiment. Adjusting the strength of salt bridge interactions removed a certain amount of strain contained in the original MD model, thus improving the binding of the hydrophobic N-terminal portion of the peptide. The arginine-rich C-terminal portion of the peptide, freed from the effect of the overstabilized salt bridges, was found to interconvert more rapidly between its multiple conformational states. The modified MD protocol has also been successfully used to simulate the entire binding process. In doing so, the peptide was initially placed high above the protein surface. It then arrived at the correct bound pose within ∼2 Å of the crystallographic coordinates. This simulation allowed us to analyze the details of the dynamic binding intermediate, i.e., the electrostatic encounter complex. However, an experimental characterization of this transient, weakly populated state remains out of reach. To overcome this problem, we designed the double mutant of c-Crk N-SH3 in which mutations Y186L and W169F abrogate tight Sos binding and shift the equilibrium toward the intermediate state resembling the electrostatic encounter complex. The results of the combined NMR and MD study of this engineered system will be reported in the next part of this paper.

[1]  F. Young Biochemistry , 1955, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[2]  Elmer S. West From the U. S. A. , 1965 .

[3]  N. Sheppard Hydrogen Bonding , 1971, Nature.

[4]  Yawen Bai,et al.  Primary structure effects on peptide group hydrogen exchange , 1993, Biochemistry.

[5]  R. J. Williams The conformational mobility of proteins and its functional significance. , 1978, Biochemical Society transactions.

[6]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[7]  K. Wüthrich NMR of proteins and nucleic acids , 1988 .

[8]  T. Straatsma,et al.  THE MISSING TERM IN EFFECTIVE PAIR POTENTIALS , 1987 .

[9]  Professor Dr. George A. Jeffrey,et al.  Hydrogen Bonding in Biological Structures , 1991, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[10]  H. Erickson,et al.  Kinetics of protein-protein association explained by Brownian dynamics computer simulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  B. Brooks,et al.  A 500 ps molecular dynamics simulation study of interleukin-1 beta in water. Correlation with nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and crystallography. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  M. Shibuya,et al.  Two species of human CRK cDNA encode proteins with distinct biological activities , 1992, Molecular and cellular biology.

[13]  M. Karplus,et al.  Influence of rapid intramolecular motion on NMR cross-relaxation rates. A molecular dynamics study of antamanide in solution , 1992 .

[14]  E. Getzoff,et al.  Faster superoxide dismutase mutants designed by enhancing electrostatic guidance , 1992, Nature.

[15]  B. Mayer,et al.  The product of the cellular crk gene consists primarily of SH2 and SH3 regions. , 1992, Cell growth & differentiation : the molecular biology journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[16]  M. Matsuda,et al.  CRK protein binds to two guanine nucleotide-releasing proteins for the Ras family and modulates nerve growth factor-induced activation of Ras in PC12 cells , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[17]  T. Pawson,et al.  Backbone dynamics of a free and phosphopeptide-complexed Src homology 2 domain studied by 15N NMR relaxation. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[18]  M. Jaye,et al.  Identification of a Src SH3 domain binding motif by screening a random phage display library. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[19]  R. Rickles,et al.  Identification of Src, Fyn, Lyn, PI3K and Abl SH3 domain ligands using phage display libraries. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[20]  A. Bax,et al.  Rotational diffusion anisotropy of human ubiquitin from 15N NMR relaxation , 1995 .

[21]  J. Zheng,et al.  Affinity and specificity requirements for the first Src homology 3 domain of the Crk proteins. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[22]  S. Grzesiek,et al.  NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes , 1995, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[23]  A. Sali,et al.  Structural basis for the specific interaction of lysine-containing proline-rich peptides with the N-terminal SH3 domain of c-Crk. , 1995, Structure.

[24]  S. Feller,et al.  Cellular proteins binding to the first Src homology 3 (SH3) domain of the proto-oncogene product c-Crk indicate Crk-specific signaling pathways. , 1995, Oncogene.

[25]  A. Fersht,et al.  Rapid, electrostatically assisted association of proteins , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[26]  T. Pawson,et al.  A Potential SH3 Domain-binding Site in the Crk SH2 Domain* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  R. Cook,et al.  Multiple cis-trans conformers of the prolactin receptor proline-rich motif (PRM) peptide detected by reverse-phase HPLC, CD and NMR spectroscopy. , 1996, The Biochemical journal.

[28]  J. Pessin,et al.  Interactions between Src Homology (SH) 2/SH3 Adapter Proteins and the Guanylnucleotide Exchange Factor SOS Are Differentially Regulated by Insulin and Epidermal Growth Factor* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Design of an expression system for detecting folded protein domains and mapping macromolecular interactions by NMR , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[30]  A. Palmer,et al.  Rotational diffusion anisotropy of proteins from simultaneous analysis of 15N and 13Cα nuclear spin relaxation , 1997, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[31]  Biologie Structurales The Kinetics of Protein-Protein Recognition , 1997 .

[32]  J. Janin The kinetics of protein‐protein recognition , 1997, Proteins.

[33]  R. R. Ernst,et al.  A Protocol for the Interpretation of Side-Chain Dynamics Based on NMR Relaxation: Application to Phenylalanines in Antamanide , 1997 .

[34]  C. Kroenke,et al.  Longitudinal and Transverse 1H−15N Dipolar/15N Chemical Shift Anisotropy Relaxation Interference: Unambiguous Determination of Rotational Diffusion Tensors and Chemical Exchange Effects in Biological Macromolecules , 1998 .

[35]  A. Bax,et al.  Measurement of J and dipolar couplings from simplified two-dimensional NMR spectra. , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[36]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[37]  D. Raleigh,et al.  Local control of peptide conformation: stabilization of cis proline peptide bonds by aromatic proline interactions. , 1998, Biopolymers.

[38]  P. Driscoll,et al.  NMR exchange broadening arising from specific low affinity protein self-association: Analysis of nitrogen-15 nuclear relaxation for rat CD2 domain 1 , 1999, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[39]  A. Petros,et al.  Rationale for Bcl‐XL/Bad peptide complex formation from structure, mutagenesis, and biophysical studies , 2000, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[40]  J. García de la Torre,et al.  HYDRONMR: prediction of NMR relaxation of globular proteins from atomic-level structures and hydrodynamic calculations. , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[41]  V. Uversky,et al.  Why are “natively unfolded” proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? , 2000, Proteins.

[42]  A. Bax,et al.  Measurement of Proton, Nitrogen, and Carbonyl Chemical Shielding Anisotropies in a Protein Dissolved in a Dilute Liquid Crystalline Phase , 2000 .

[43]  S. Pongor,et al.  Arginine–phosphate salt bridges in protein–DNA complexes: a Car–Parrinello study , 2001 .

[44]  P. Romero,et al.  Sequence complexity of disordered protein , 2001, Proteins.

[45]  T. Muir,et al.  Rescuing a destabilized protein fold through backbone cyclization. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[46]  A. Fersht,et al.  Experimental assignment of the structure of the transition state for the association of barnase and barstar. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  B. Roux,et al.  Energetics of ion conduction through the K + channel , 2022 .

[48]  Simulated and NMR-derived backbone dynamics of a protein with significant flexibility: a comparison of spectral densities for the betaARK1 PH domain. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[49]  K. Terpe Overview of tag protein fusions: from molecular and biochemical fundamentals to commercial systems , 2002, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[50]  L. Iakoucheva,et al.  Intrinsic disorder in cell-signaling and cancer-associated proteins. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[51]  H. Dyson,et al.  Structural basis for Hif-1α/CBP recognition in the cellular hypoxic response , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Relationship between ion pair geometries and electrostatic strengths in proteins. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[53]  L. Kay,et al.  An NMR experiment for the accurate measurement of heteronuclear spin-lock relaxation rates. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[54]  F. Ni,et al.  Probing the kinetic landscape of transient peptide-protein interactions by use of peptide (15)n NMR relaxation dispersion spectroscopy: binding of an antithrombin peptide to human prothrombin. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[55]  Wei Zhang,et al.  A point‐charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed‐phase quantum mechanical calculations , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[56]  D. Fushman,et al.  Characterization of the overall and local dynamics of a protein with intermediate rotational anisotropy: Differentiating between conformational exchange and anisotropic diffusion in the B3 domain of protein G , 2003, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[57]  Franca Fraternali,et al.  POPS: a fast algorithm for solvent accessible surface areas at atomic and residue level , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[58]  M. Akke,et al.  Combined use of NMR relaxation measurements and hydrodynamic calculations to study protein association. Evidence for tetramers of low molecular weight protein tyrosine phosphatase in solution. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[59]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Extended disordered proteins: targeting function with less scaffold. , 2003, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[60]  D. Fushman,et al.  Direct measurement of the transverse and longitudinal 15N chemical shift anisotropy–dipolar cross‐correlation rate constants using 1H‐coupled HSQC spectra , 2003 .

[61]  B. Sykes,et al.  High‐yield expression of isotopically labeled peptides for use in NMR studies , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[62]  Chris Oostenbrink,et al.  A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: The GROMOS force‐field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6 , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[63]  M. Emi,et al.  Amplification, up-regulation and over-expression of C3G (CRK SH3 domain-binding guanine nucleotide-releasing factor) in non-small cell lung cancers , 2004, Journal of Human Genetics.

[64]  Greg L. Hura,et al.  Development of an improved four-site water model for biomolecular simulations: TIP4P-Ew. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[65]  L. Hengst,et al.  p27 binds cyclin–CDK complexes through a sequential mechanism involving binding-induced protein folding , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[66]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas‐phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[67]  J. S. Sodhi,et al.  Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[68]  L. Iakoucheva,et al.  The importance of intrinsic disorder for protein phosphorylation. , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[69]  O. Walker,et al.  NMR reveals a novel glutaredoxin-glutaredoxin interaction interface. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[70]  Jiangning Song,et al.  Prediction of cis/trans isomerization in proteins using PSI-BLAST profiles and secondary structure information , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[71]  Sergio E. Wong,et al.  Competition between intramolecular hydrogen bonds and solvation in phosphorylated peptides: simulations with explicit and implicit solvent. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[72]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  The Amber biomolecular simulation programs , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[73]  C. Arrowsmith,et al.  Single-stranded DNA mimicry in the p53 transactivation domain interaction with replication protein A , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[74]  S. Ferré,et al.  Amazing stability of the arginine-phosphate electrostatic interaction. , 2005, Journal of proteome research.

[75]  A. Bonvin,et al.  NMR Relaxation and Internal Dynamics of Ubiquitin from a 0.2 μs MD Simulation. , 2005, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[76]  Marc S. Cortese,et al.  Comparing and combining predictors of mostly disordered proteins. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[77]  B. Hess,et al.  Hydration thermodynamic properties of amino acid analogues: a systematic comparison of biomolecular force fields and water models. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[78]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  A polarizable model of water for molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules , 2006 .

[79]  G. Wider,et al.  Measuring protein concentrations by NMR spectroscopy. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[80]  Marc S. Cortese,et al.  Analysis of molecular recognition features (MoRFs). , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[81]  T. Walsh,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of peptide carboxylate hydration. , 2006, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[82]  V. Hornak,et al.  Investigation of Salt Bridge Stability in a Generalized Born Solvent Model. , 2006, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[83]  V. Hornak,et al.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters , 2006, Proteins.

[84]  G. Wider,et al.  Concentration measurements by PULCON using X‐filtered or 2D NMR spectra , 2006, Magnetic resonance in chemistry : MRC.

[85]  B. Sykes,et al.  Backbone dynamics of SDF‐1α determined by NMR: Interpretation in the presence of monomer–dimer equilibrium , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[86]  R. Brüschweiler,et al.  Validation of Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Biomolecules Using NMR Spin Relaxation as Benchmarks:  Application to the AMBER99SB Force Field. , 2007, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[87]  R. Nishikawa,et al.  ELMO1 and Dock180, a bipartite Rac1 guanine nucleotide exchange factor, promote human glioma cell invasion. , 2007, Cancer research.

[88]  Christopher J. Oldfield,et al.  Functional anthology of intrinsic disorder. 1. Biological processes and functions of proteins with long disordered regions. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[89]  Lewis E. Kay,et al.  Improved magnetization alignment schemes for spin-lock relaxation experiments , 2007, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[90]  R. Birge,et al.  Proline cis-trans isomerization controls autoinhibition of a signaling protein. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[91]  H. Dyson,et al.  Mechanism of coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein , 2007, Nature.

[92]  F. Jensen,et al.  Force Field Modeling of Amino Acid Conformational Energies. , 2007, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[93]  K. Ogura,et al.  Structural basis for the transforming activity of human cancer-related signaling adaptor protein CRK , 2007, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[94]  B. Reif,et al.  Methyl rotation barriers in proteins from 2H relaxation data. Implications for protein structure. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[95]  Kai Zhu,et al.  Improved Methods for Side Chain and Loop Predictions via the Protein Local Optimization Program:  Variable Dielectric Model for Implicitly Improving the Treatment of Polarization Effects. , 2007, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[96]  H. Chan,et al.  Polyelectrostatic interactions of disordered ligands suggest a physical basis for ultrasensitivity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[97]  A. Bax,et al.  Protein backbone chemical shifts predicted from searching a database for torsion angle and sequence homology , 2007, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[98]  A. Dunker,et al.  Controlled Chaos , 2008, Science.

[99]  Mazen Ahmad,et al.  Mechanism of fast peptide recognition by SH3 domains. , 2008, Angewandte Chemie.

[100]  A. Nairn,et al.  Detailed structural characterization of unbound protein phosphatase 1 inhibitors. , 2008, Biochemistry.

[101]  R. Friesner,et al.  Structural analysis of protein dynamics by MD simulations and NMR spin‐relaxation , 2008, Proteins.

[102]  Pengyu Y. Ren,et al.  Calculation of protein–ligand binding free energy by using a polarizable potential , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[103]  Jan H. Jensen,et al.  Very fast prediction and rationalization of pKa values for protein–ligand complexes , 2008, Proteins.

[104]  J. Shea,et al.  Energetics of infinite homopolypeptide chains: a new look at commonly used force fields. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[105]  Narayanan Eswar,et al.  Protein structure modeling with MODELLER. , 2008, Methods in molecular biology.

[106]  Asim Okur,et al.  Evaluation of Salt Bridge Structure and Energetics in Peptides Using Explicit, Implicit, and Hybrid Solvation Models. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[107]  D. Cowburn,et al.  Accurate sampling of high-frequency motions in proteins by steady-state (15)N-{(1)H} nuclear Overhauser effect measurements in the presence of cross-correlated relaxation. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[108]  Huan‐Xiang Zhou,et al.  Fundamental aspects of protein-protein association kinetics. , 2009, Chemical reviews.

[109]  R. Birge,et al.  Crk and CrkL adaptor proteins: networks for physiological and pathological signaling , 2009, Cell Communication and Signaling.

[110]  H. Dyson,et al.  Linking folding and binding. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[111]  A. Mittermaier,et al.  Binding mechanism of an SH3 domain studied by NMR and ITC. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[112]  G. Hummer,et al.  Optimized molecular dynamics force fields applied to the helix-coil transition of polypeptides. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[113]  Guohui Li,et al.  Trypsin‐ligand binding free energies from explicit and implicit solvent simulations with polarizable potential , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[114]  J. Marsh,et al.  Sequence determinants of compaction in intrinsically disordered proteins. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[115]  A. Nairn,et al.  Spinophilin directs Protein Phosphatase 1 specificity by blocking substrate binding sites , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[116]  M. Otyepka,et al.  Explicit Water Models Affect the Specific Solvation and Dynamics of Unfolded Peptides While the Conformational Behavior and Flexibility of Folded Peptides Remain Intact. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[117]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Accurate Calculation of Hydration Free Energies using Pair-Specific Lennard-Jones Parameters in the CHARMM Drude Polarizable Force Field. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[118]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Enhanced Conformational Space Sampling Improves the Prediction of Chemical Shifts in Proteins , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[119]  Margaret E. Johnson,et al.  Current status of the AMOEBA polarizable force field. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[120]  Chun Wu,et al.  Assessing the Performance of Popular Quantum Mechanics and Molecular Mechanics Methods and Revealing the Sequence-Dependent Energetic Features Using 100 Tetrapeptide Models , 2010 .

[121]  B. Roux,et al.  Simulation of Osmotic Pressure in Concentrated Aqueous Salt Solutions , 2010 .

[122]  A. Stuchebrukhov,et al.  Electronic continuum model for molecular dynamics simulations of biological molecules. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[123]  Experimental verification of force fields for molecular dynamics simulations using Gly-Pro-Gly-Gly. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[124]  Peter L. Freddolino,et al.  Simulations of a protein crystal with a high resolution X-ray structure: evaluation of force fields and water models. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[125]  J. Baum,et al.  Detection of transient interchain interactions in the intrinsically disordered protein alpha-synuclein by NMR paramagnetic relaxation enhancement. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[126]  R. Brüschweiler,et al.  Certification of Molecular Dynamics Trajectories with NMR Chemical Shifts , 2010 .

[127]  Timothy D. Fenn,et al.  Polarizable atomic multipole x-ray refinement: hydration geometry and application to macromolecules. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[128]  R. Dror,et al.  Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field , 2010, Proteins.

[129]  Simon W. Ginzinger,et al.  SHIFTX2: significantly improved protein chemical shift prediction , 2011, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[130]  Kevin M. D'Auria,et al.  Structural and dynamic determinants of protein-peptide recognition. , 2011, Structure.

[131]  A. Stuchebrukhov,et al.  Accounting for electronic polarization in non-polarizable force fields. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[132]  Nicolas L. Fawzi,et al.  Atomic resolution dynamics on the surface of amyloid β protofibrils probed by solution NMR , 2011, Nature.

[133]  J. Rojas,et al.  Mammalian son of sevenless Guanine nucleotide exchange factors: old concepts and new perspectives. , 2011, Genes & cancer.

[134]  A. Garcia,et al.  Influence of water-protein hydrogen bonding on the stability of Trp-cage miniprotein. A comparison between the TIP3P and TIP4P-Ew water models. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[135]  Asim Okur,et al.  Improving the description of salt bridge strength and geometry in a Generalized Born model. , 2011, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[136]  Huan‐Xiang Zhou,et al.  Automated prediction of protein association rate constants. , 2011, Structure.

[137]  Christopher D. Snow,et al.  Polarizable protein packing , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..

[138]  K. Lindorff-Larsen,et al.  How robust are protein folding simulations with respect to force field parameterization? , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[139]  T. Head-Gordon,et al.  Optimizing Protein-Solvent Force Fields to Reproduce Intrinsic Conformational Preferences of Model Peptides. , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[140]  L. Kay,et al.  Studying "invisible" excited protein states in slow exchange with a major state conformation. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[141]  N. Skrynnikov,et al.  Microsecond time-scale conformational exchange in proteins: using long molecular dynamics trajectory to simulate NMR relaxation dispersion data. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[142]  G De Fabritiis,et al.  Visualizing the Induced Binding of SH2-Phosphopeptide. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[143]  Stefan Wallin,et al.  Binding of Two Intrinsically Disordered Peptides to a Multi-Specific Protein: A Combined Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Study , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[144]  R. Brüschweiler,et al.  PPM: a side-chain and backbone chemical shift predictor for the assessment of protein conformational ensembles , 2012, Journal of Biomolecular NMR.

[145]  Huan‐Xiang Zhou,et al.  Rate constants and mechanisms of intrinsically disordered proteins binding to structured targets. , 2012, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[146]  Jianhan Chen,et al.  Electrostatically accelerated coupled binding and folding of intrinsically disordered proteins. , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.

[147]  G. Makhatadze,et al.  Thermodynamic and kinetic analysis of peptides derived from CapZ, NDR, p53, HDM2, and HDM4 binding to human S100B. , 2012, Biochemistry.

[148]  Jejoong Yoo,et al.  Improved Parametrization of Li+, Na+, K+, and Mg2+ Ions for All-Atom Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Nucleic Acid Systems , 2012 .

[149]  P. Wright,et al.  Quantitative analysis of multisite protein-ligand interactions by NMR: binding of intrinsically disordered p53 transactivation subdomains with the TAZ2 domain of CBP. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[150]  E. L. Kovrigin NMR line shapes and multi-state binding equilibria , 2012, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[151]  R. Laatikainen,et al.  Combining NMR ensembles and molecular dynamics simulations provides more realistic models of protein structures in solution and leads to better chemical shift prediction , 2012, Journal of Biomolecular NMR.

[152]  Kate A. Stafford,et al.  Interpreting protein structural dynamics from NMR chemical shifts. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[153]  Maili Liu,et al.  Noncovalent Dimerization of Ubiquitin** , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[154]  Rhiju Das,et al.  Are Protein Force Fields Getting Better? A Systematic Benchmark on 524 Diverse NMR Measurements. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[155]  D. Case,et al.  Derivation of fixed partial charges for amino acids accommodating a specific water model and implicit polarization. , 2013, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[156]  A. Elcock,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of highly crowded amino acid solutions: comparisons of eight different force field combinations with experiment and with each other. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[157]  Weihong Zhang,et al.  Electrostatically Accelerated Encounter and Folding for Facile Recognition of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[158]  P. Bates,et al.  Modeling protein association mechanisms and kinetics. , 2013, Current opinion in structural biology.

[159]  Thomas Simonson,et al.  Simulating GTP:Mg and GDP:Mg with a simple force field: A structural and thermodynamic analysis , 2013, J. Comput. Chem..

[160]  B. Roux,et al.  Simulations of anionic lipid membranes: development of interaction-specific ion parameters and validation using NMR data. , 2013, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[161]  Jörg Gsponer,et al.  On the Importance of Polar Interactions for Complexes Containing Intrinsically Disordered Proteins , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[162]  Karl T. Debiec,et al.  Evaluating the Strength of Salt Bridges: A Comparison of Current Biomolecular Force Fields , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[163]  P. Jemth,et al.  Helical propensity in an intrinsically disordered protein accelerates ligand binding. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[164]  D. Donadio,et al.  Interaction of charged amino-acid side chains with ions: an optimization strategy for classical force fields. , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[165]  M. Ubbink,et al.  An Ensemble of Rapidly Interconverting Orientations in Electrostatic Protein–Peptide Complexes Characterized by NMR Spectroscopy , 2014, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.