Spatial Approximation between Secretin Residue Five and the Third Extracellular Loop of Its Receptor Provides New Insight into the Molecular Basis of Natural Agonist Binding

The amino terminus of class II G protein-coupled receptors plays an important role in ligand binding and receptor activation. Understanding of the conformation of the amino-terminal domain of these receptors has been substantially advanced with the solution of nuclear magnetic resonance and crystal structures of this region of receptors for corticotrophin-releasing factor, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide, and gastric inhibitory polypeptide. However, the orientation of the amino terminus relative to the receptor core and how the receptor gets activated upon ligand binding remain unclear. In this work, we have used photoaffinity labeling to identify a critical spatial approximation between residue five of secretin and a residue within the proposed third extracellular loop of the secretin receptor. This was achieved by purification, deglycosylation, cyanogen bromide cleavage, and sequencing of labeled wild-type and mutant secretin receptors. This constraint has been used to refine our evolving molecular model of secretin docked at the intact receptor, which for the first time includes refined helical bundle and loop regions and reflects a peptide-binding groove within the receptor amino terminus that directs the amino terminus of the peptide toward the receptor body. This model is fully consistent with the endogenous agonist mechanism for class II G protein-coupled receptor activation, where ligand binding promotes the interaction of a portion of the receptor amino terminus with the receptor body to activate it.

[1]  H. Kofod Synthesis of biologically active porcine secretin and [ITyr10] porcine secretin. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[2]  L. Miller,et al.  Use of N,O-bis-Fmoc-D-Tyr-ONSu for introduction of an oxidative iodination site into cholecystokinin family peptides. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[3]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Analysis of Secretin Docking to Its Receptor , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  R. Rudolph,et al.  Crystal structure of the incretin-bound extracellular domain of a G protein-coupled receptor , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Molecular Approximations between Residues 21 and 23 of Secretin and Its Receptor: Development of a Model for Peptide Docking with the Amino Terminus of the Secretin Receptor , 2007, Molecular Pharmacology.

[6]  P. Hajduk,et al.  Solution structure and mutational analysis of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide binding to the extracellular domain of PAC1-RS , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  R. Riek,et al.  Structure of the N-terminal domain of a type B1 G protein-coupled receptor in complex with a peptide ligand , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Y. Asmann,et al.  Possible Endogenous Agonist Mechanism for the Activation of Secretin Family G Protein-Coupled Receptors , 2006, Molecular Pharmacology.

[9]  L. Miller,et al.  Use of Probes with Fluorescence Indicator Distributed throughout the Pharmacophore to Examine the Peptide Agonist-binding Environment of the Family B G Protein-coupled Secretin Receptor* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Pocketome via Comprehensive Identification and Classification of Ligand Binding Envelopes* , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[11]  Richard R. Neubig,et al.  International Union of Pharmacology. XLVI. G Protein-Coupled Receptor List , 2005, Pharmacological Reviews.

[12]  R. Riek,et al.  NMR structure and peptide hormone binding site of the first extracellular domain of a type B1 G protein-coupled receptor. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  L. Miller,et al.  Molecular Approximation between a Residue in the Amino-terminal Region of Calcitonin and the Third Extracellular Loop of the Class B G Protein-coupled Calcitonin Receptor* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  T. Lybrand,et al.  Spatial Approximation between the Amino Terminus of a Peptide Agonist and the Top of the Sixth Transmembrane Segment of the Secretin Receptor* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  L. Miller,et al.  Importance of the Amino Terminus in Secretin Family G Protein-coupled Receptors , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  Darrell R. Abernethy,et al.  International Union of Pharmacology: Approaches to the Nomenclature of Voltage-Gated Ion Channels , 2003, Pharmacological Reviews.

[17]  T. Lybrand,et al.  Spatial Approximation between Two Residues in the Mid-region of Secretin and the Amino Terminus of Its Receptor , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  T. Lybrand,et al.  Erratum: Spatial approximation between a photolabile residue in position 13 of secretin and the amino terminus of the secretin receptor (Molecular Pharmacology (2003) 63 (993-1001)) , 2003 .

[19]  H. Schiöth,et al.  The G-protein-coupled receptors in the human genome form five main families. Phylogenetic analysis, paralogon groups, and fingerprints. , 2003, Molecular pharmacology.

[20]  T. Lybrand,et al.  Spatial approximation between a photolabile residue in position 13 of secretin and the amino terminus of the secretin receptor. , 2003, Molecular pharmacology.

[21]  T. Lybrand,et al.  Interaction among four residues distributed through the secretin pharmacophore and a focused region of the secretin receptor amino terminus. , 2002, Molecular endocrinology.

[22]  Y. Asmann,et al.  Identification of Two Pairs of Spatially Approximated Residues within the Carboxyl Terminus of Secretin and Its Receptor* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[23]  L. Miller,et al.  Identification of an Interaction between Residue 6 of the Natural Peptide Ligand and a Distinct Residue within the Amino-terminal Tail of the Secretin Receptor* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  T. Frimurer,et al.  Structure of the integral membrane domain of the GLP1 receptor , 1999, Proteins.

[25]  L. Miller,et al.  Demonstration of a Direct Interaction between Residue 22 in the Carboxyl-terminal Half of Secretin and the Amino-terminal Tail of the Secretin Receptor Using Photoaffinity Labeling* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  L. Suva,et al.  Parathyroid Hormone-Receptor Interactions Identified Directly by Photocross-linking and Molecular Modeling Studies* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  L. Miller,et al.  Secretin and vasoactive intestinal peptide receptors: members of a unique family of G protein-coupled receptors. , 1998, Gastroenterology.

[28]  T. Lybrand,et al.  Direct Identification of a Distinct Site of Interaction between the Carboxyl-terminal Residue of Cholecystokinin and the Type A Cholecystokinin Receptor Using Photoaffinity Labeling* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  J. Vilardaga,et al.  The C-terminus ends of secretin and VIP interact with the N-terminal domains of their receptors , 1996, Peptides.

[30]  L. Miller,et al.  Relationship Between Native and Recombinant Cholecystokinin Receptors: Role of Differential Glycosylation , 1996, Pancreas.

[31]  J. Vilardaga,et al.  Interaction of amino acid residues at positions 8-15 of secretin with the N-terminal domain of the secretin receptor. , 1996, European journal of biochemistry.

[32]  L. Miller,et al.  Multiple Extracellular Loop Domains Contribute Critical Determinants for Agonist Binding and Activation of the Secretin Receptor* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  C. Sander,et al.  Errors in protein structures , 1996, Nature.

[34]  Y. Cao,et al.  The amino-terminal fragment of the adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP) receptor functions as a high affinity PACAP binding domain. , 1995, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[35]  L. Miller,et al.  Critical Contributions of Amino-terminal Extracellular Domains in Agonist Binding and Activation of Secretin and Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide Receptors. STUDIES OF CHIMERIC RECEPTORS (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[36]  Ruben Abagyan,et al.  ICM—A new method for protein modeling and design: Applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation , 1994, J. Comput. Chem..

[37]  H. Jüppner,et al.  The extracellular amino-terminal region of the parathyroid hormone (PTH)/PTH-related peptide receptor determines the binding affinity for carboxyl-terminal fragments of PTH-(1-34). , 1994, Endocrinology.

[38]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Biased probability Monte Carlo conformational searches and electrostatic calculations for peptides and proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  L. Miller,et al.  Intrinsic photoaffinity labeling of native and recombinant rat pancreatic secretin receptors. , 1993, Gastroenterology.

[40]  J. Thornton,et al.  PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures , 1993 .

[41]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Determination of the backbone conformation of secretin by restrained molecular dynamics on the basis of interproton distance data. , 1988, European journal of biochemistry.

[42]  L. Miller,et al.  Analysis of the carbohydrate composition of the pancreatic plasmalemmal glycoprotein affinity labeled by short probes for the cholecystokinin receptor. , 1987, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[43]  D Rodbard,et al.  Ligand: a versatile computerized approach for characterization of ligand-binding systems. , 1980, Analytical biochemistry.

[44]  J. Holst,et al.  Secretin and Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide in the Control of the Endocrine Pancreas1 , 1980 .

[45]  F. Sanger,et al.  DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  J. Gardner,et al.  Interaction of synthetic 10-tyrosyl analogues of secretin with hormone receptors on pancreatic acinar cells. , 1977, Gastroenterology.

[47]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4 , 1970, Nature.

[48]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[49]  R. Stevens,et al.  High-resolution crystal structure of an engineered human beta2-adrenergic G protein-coupled receptor. , 2007, Science.