Using preventive home monitoring to reduce hospital admission rates and reduce costs: a case study of telehealth among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients

We studied whether preventive home monitoring of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) could reduce the frequency of hospital admissions and lower the cost of hospitalization. Patients were recruited from a health centre, general practitioner (GP) or the pulmonary hospital ward. They were randomized to usual care or tele-rehabilitation with a telehealth monitoring device installed in their home for four months. A total of 111 patients were suitable for inclusion and consented to be randomized: 60 patients were allocated to intervention and three were lost to follow-up. In the control group 51 patients were allocated to usual care and three patients were lost to follow-up. In the tele-rehabilitation group, the mean hospital admission rate was 0.49 per patient per 10 months compared to the control group rate of 1.17; this difference was significant (P = 0.041). The mean cost of admissions was €3461 per patient in the intervention group and €4576 in the control group; this difference was not significant. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for time to hospital admission were longer for the intervention group than the controls, but the difference was not significant. Future work requires large-scale studies of prolonged home monitoring with more extended follow-up.

[1]  W. Ghali,et al.  Effectiveness of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-management programs: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2008, The American journal of medicine.

[2]  S. Peirce,et al.  Insufficient evidence of benefit: a systematic review of home telemonitoring for COPD. , 2011, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[3]  Ole K. Hejlesen,et al.  Interaction Between COPD Patients and Healthcare Professionals in a Cross-Sector Tele-Rehabilitation Programme , 2011, MIE.

[4]  S. Scalvini,et al.  Tele-assistance in chronic respiratory failure patients: a randomised clinical trial , 2008, European Respiratory Journal.

[5]  T. Seemungal,et al.  Exacerbation rate, health status and mortality in COPD – a review of potential interventions , 2009, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

[6]  Karen Cimon,et al.  Home telehealth for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2010, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[7]  Egon Toft,et al.  Empowering Patients with COPD using Tele-Homecare Technology , 2010, EFMI-STC.

[8]  Kathryn Coyle,et al.  Home telehealth for chronic disease management: A systematic review and an analysis of economic evaluations , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[9]  J. Lammers,et al.  Systematic review of the effects of chronic disease management on quality-of-life in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 2007, Respiratory medicine.

[10]  F. Martinez,et al.  Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. , 2007, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[11]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: Global Burden of Disease Study , 1997, The Lancet.

[12]  J. Vestbo,et al.  [Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Admission, course and prognosis]. , 2003, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[13]  Guy Paré,et al.  Review Paper: Systematic Review of Home Telemonitoring for Chronic Diseases: The Evidence Base , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..