“Free” versus “Forced” Exploration of a Novel Situation by Rats

Ir_ the study of exploratory behavior in rats it has been the custom to place an animal in novel surroundings and record its subsequent behavior. In such cases the animal is allowed no choice as to whether or not it shall enter the novel situation. Several studies have shown, however, that animals may be initially timid when faced with a novel situation ( 3, 4, 5, 7, 11, 13, 14) , and if allowed freedom of choice, do not approach and explore it until after a certain degree of exposure to the situation ( 3, 4, 5, 11, 13 ). If a new situation is feared or avoided initially, it is possible that animals placed in such a situation without their consent initially may be seeking an avenue of escape. If such were the case, the meandering of a frightened rat held captive in a maze might require a different explanation than would behavior in the same situation which occurred by the animal's own choice. In any event, a more precise definition of the term "exploration" is probably necessary. 'The present study was designed to compare certain characteristics of "exploratory" behavior elicited under two conditions: one in which the animal was forced to occupy an enclosure; the other in which it was allowed freedom of choice of entry into the same situation. The results show that the characteristics of exploratory behavior differ markedly under these two conditions.

[1]  K. Montgomery,et al.  The relation between fear induced by novel stimulation and exploratory behavior. , 1955, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[2]  K. Montgomery,et al.  The relation between exploratory behavior and spontaneous alternation in the white rat. , 1951, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[3]  R. Yerkes,et al.  Nature and conditions of avoidance (fear) response in chimpanzee. , 1936 .

[4]  K. Montgomery,et al.  The relation between fear induced by novel stimulation and exploratory drive. , 1955 .

[5]  G. M. Haslerud The effect of movement of stimulus objects upon avoidance reactions in chimpanzees. , 1938 .

[6]  Welker Wi Effects of age and experience on play and exploration of young chimpanzees. , 1956 .

[7]  G. M. Haslerud,et al.  Affective responses of an infant chimpanzee reared in isolation from its kind. , 1939 .

[8]  K. Montgomery Exploratory behavior as a function of similarity of stimulus situations. , 1953, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[9]  W. Welker Effects of age and experience on play and exploration of young chimpanzees. , 1956, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[10]  K. Montgomery The effect of the hunger and thirst drives upon exploratory behavior. , 1953, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[11]  R. Melzack Irrational fears in the dog. , 1952, Canadian journal of psychology.

[12]  B. B. Hudson One-trial learning in the domestic rat. , 1950, Genetic psychology monographs.

[13]  J. F. Dashiell A quantitative demonstration of animal drive. , 1925 .

[14]  Montgomery Kc Exploratory behavior as a function of similarity of stimulus situations. , 1953 .

[15]  W. R. Thompson Exploratory behavior as a function of hunger in "bright" and "dull" rats. , 1953, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.