Performance optimization of dry-cooling systems for power plants through SQP methods

Abstract In this study the application of modern optimization techniques to obtain cost optimal design and performance of dry-cooling systems for power plant applications, is illustrated. The Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP) method, as well as a SQP decomposition technique are implemented. It is shown that through the proper application of these powerful optimization strategies and careful tailoring of the well-constructed optimization model, direct optimization of complex models does not need to be time-consuming and difficult. The optimal results and trends that one is able to obtain by means of the efficient computational procedures discussed in this paper, pose a challenge and establish new design and performance practices to designers, manufacturers and operators. The degree of optimization that is ultimately achieved in such an economic optimization analysis and its value to a design engineer, are functions of the sophistication of the design program, the expertise of the user, the cost-estimating procedure and the quality of the input data.

[1]  Philip E. Gill,et al.  Practical optimization , 1981 .

[2]  Kenneth King Humphreys Jelen's Cost and Optimization Engineering , 1991 .

[3]  Donald Goldfarb,et al.  A numerically stable dual method for solving strictly convex quadratic programs , 1983, Math. Program..

[4]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  A Reduced Hessian Method for Large-Scale Constrained Optimization , 1995, SIAM J. Optim..

[5]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Some issues in implementing a sequential quadratic programming algorithm , 1985, SGNM.

[6]  Detlev G. Kröger Fan performance in air-cooled steam condensers , 1994 .

[7]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  Acceleration of reduced Hessian methods for large-scale nonlinear programming , 1993 .

[8]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Considerations of numerical analysis in a sequential quadratic programming method , 1986 .

[9]  E. S. Miliaras Power Plants with Air-Cooled Condensing Systems , 1974 .

[10]  Leon R. Glicksman,et al.  Computer optimization of dry and wet/dry cooling tower systems for large fossil and nuclear power plants , 1979 .

[11]  L. Biegler,et al.  Large-scale decomposition for successive quadratic programming , 1988 .

[12]  M. J. D. Powell,et al.  A fast algorithm for nonlinearly constrained optimization calculations , 1978 .

[13]  Detlev G. Kröger,et al.  Cost-Optimal Design of Dry Cooling Towers Through Mathematical Programming Techniques , 1989 .

[14]  L. Biegler,et al.  Quadratic programming methods for reduced Hessian SQP , 1994 .

[15]  R. Fletcher Practical Methods of Optimization , 1988 .

[16]  Detlev G. Kröger,et al.  Performance evaluation of dry-cooling systems for power plant applications , 1996 .

[17]  M. J. D. Powell,et al.  VMCWD: a Fortran subroutine for constrained optimization , 1983, SMAP.

[18]  Richard H. Edahl,et al.  Improved successive quadratic programming optimization algorithm for engineering design problems , 1983 .

[19]  Antonie Eduard Conradie Performance optimization of engineering systems with particular reference to dry-cooled power plants , 1995 .

[20]  M. J. D. Powell,et al.  Extensions to subroutine VFO2AD , 1982 .

[21]  J. G. Ecker,et al.  Optimal design of a dry-type natural-draft cooling tower by geometric programming , 1978 .

[22]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Numerical methods for unconstrained optimization and nonlinear equations , 1983, Prentice Hall series in computational mathematics.

[23]  Detlev G. Kröger,et al.  Dimensioning heat exchangers for existing dry cooling towers , 1989 .

[24]  M. W. Larinoff,et al.  Power plant siting, performance, and economics with dry cooling tower systems , 1970 .