A method for the study of the effects of combining multiple pseudorandom fusimotor stimulation on the responses of muscle-spindle primary-ending afferents

We describe a new method of investigation of the integrative action of fusimotor inputs in mammalian muscle spindles by stimulation of multiple fusimotor axons using independent pseudorandom pulse trains, each of low mean rate with pseudorandomly distributed stimulus intervals. Technically it was feasible only because of the development of (1) a novel, highly efficient approach to functional isolation of fusimotor efferents in ventral-root filaments, which we have called the isodyne strategy; (2) a real-time, microprocessor-based stimulus artefact cancellation device (SACAD); and (3) a highly adjustable, multi-branch stimulation electrode array. The general approach of using multiple, independent, pseudorandom stimulation of several input channels has wider applications in controlled-activation paradigms.

[1]  F. Emonet-Dénand,et al.  Observations on the effects on spindle primary endings of the stimulation at low frequency of dynamic β-axons , 1983, Brain Research.

[2]  M. Hulliger,et al.  After-effects of fusimotor stimulation on spindle la afferents' dynamic sensitivity, revealed during slow movements , 1982, Brain Research.

[3]  Prediction of muscle stretch receptor behavior using Wiener kernels , 1985, Brain Research.

[4]  Y. Laporte,et al.  Action of static and dynamic fusimotor fibres on secondary endings of cat's spindles , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  R Durbaba,et al.  Static and dynamic γ‐motor output to ankle flexor muscles during locomotion in the decerebrate cat , 2006, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  R. W. Banks.  Intrafusal motor innervation: a quantitative histological analysis of tenuissimus muscle spindles in the cat. , 1994, Journal of anatomy.

[7]  P. Ellaway.  The variability in discharge of fusimotor neurones in the decerebrate cat , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  J. Kröller.  Reverse correlation analysis of the stretch response of primary muscle spindle afferent fibers , 1993, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  R B Stein,et al.  Phasic and tonic modulation of impulse rates in gamma-motoneurons during locomotion in premammillary cats. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  W Herzog,et al.  A new method for experimental simulation of EMG using multi-channel independent stimulation of small groups of motor units. , 2001, Motor control.

[11]  M. McGlamery.  Mammalian Muscle Receptors and Their Central Actions , 1973 .

[12]  R. Poppele.  An analysis of muscle spindle behavior using randomly applied stretches , 1981, Neuroscience.

[13]  S J Day,et al.  Experimental simulation of cat electromyogram: evidence for algebraic summation of motor-unit action-potential trains. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  A Prochazka,et al.  Flexible fusimotor control of muscle spindle feedback during a variety of natural movements. , 1989, Progress in brain research.

[15]  J J Scott,et al.  The number and distribution of muscle spindles and tendon organs in the peroneal muscles of the cat. , 1987, Journal of anatomy.

[16]  M Hulliger,et al.  Static and dynamic fusimotor action on the response of IA fibres to low frequency sinusoidal stretching of widely ranging amplitude , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  R. W. Banks.  The distribution of static gamma‐axons in the tenuissimus muscle of the cat. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  P. Matthews.  The differentiation of two types of fusimotor fibre by their effects on the dynamic response of muscle spindle primary endings. , 1962, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[19]  P. Matthews,et al.  On the subdivision of static and dynamic fusimotor actions on the primary ending of the cat muscle spindle. , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  P. Matthews,et al.  Mammalian muscle receptors and their central actions , 1974 .

[21]  E Otten,et al.  Pacemaker activity in a sensory ending with multiple encoding sites: the cat muscle spindle primary ending. , 1997, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  M. Hulliger,et al.  Static and dynamic fusimotor interaction and the possibility of multiple pace-makers operating in the cat muscle spindle , 1979, Brain Research.

[23]  O. Grüsser,et al.  The response of primary muscle spindle endings to random muscle stretch: a quantitative analysis , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  R. W. Banks,et al.  Chapter 6 – The Muscle Spindle , 2005 .

[25]  M. Hulliger,et al.  The mammalian muscle spindle and its central control. , 1984, Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology.

[26]  M Hulliger,et al.  Effects of combining static and dynamic fusimotor stimulation on the response of the muscle spindle primary ending to sinusoidal stretching. , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  P. Rack,et al.  The effects of length and stimulus rate on tension in the isometric cat soleus muscle , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  R. W. Banks,et al.  Testing the classification of static gamma axons using different patterns of random stimulation. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  J. R. Rosenberg,et al.  Spectral composition of muscle spindle Ia responses to combined length and fusimotor inputs , 1985 .

[30]  M Hulliger,et al.  The dependence of the response of cat spindle Ia afferents to sinusoidal stretch on the velocity of concomitant movement. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  R. Durbaba,et al.  Physiological signs of the activation of bag2 and chain intrafusal muscle fibers of gastrocnemius muscle spindles in the cat. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.