Affect, risk perception and future optimism after the tsunami disaster

Environmental events such as natural disasters may influence the public’s affective reactions and decisions. Shortly after the 2004 Tsunami disaster we assessed how affect elicited by thinking about this disaster influenced risk perceptions and future time perspective in Swedish undergraduates not directly affected by the disaster. An experimental manipulation was used to increase the salience of affect associated with the disaster. In Study 1 we found that participants reminded about the tsunami had a sense that their life was more finite and included fewer opportunities than participants in the control condition (not reminded about the tsunami). In Study 2 we found similar effects for risk perceptions. In addition, we showed that manipulations of ease-of-thought influenced the extent to which affect influenced these risk perceptions, with greater ease of thoughts being associated with greater perceived risks.

[1]  E. Peters,et al.  THE FUNCTIONS OF AFFECT IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF PREFERENCES ( 2006 , 2008 .

[2]  G. Clore,et al.  How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  R. Dhar,et al.  Preference Fluency in Choice , 2007 .

[4]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The affect heuristic , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  H. Mann.  Upplevd nyhetsrapportering och associerade känslor i samband med katastrofer : En explorativ studie , 2007 .

[6]  Ian Skurnik,et al.  Metacognitive Experiences and the Intricacies of Setting People Straight: Implications for Debiasing and Public Information Campaigns , 2007 .

[7]  J. Lau,et al.  Impacts of media coverage on the community stress level in Hong Kong after the tsunami on 26 December 2004 , 2006, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[8]  L. Carstensen.  The Influence of a Sense of Time on Human Development , 2006, Science.

[9]  L. Carstensen,et al.  Goals Change When Life's Fragility is Primed: Lessons Learned From Older Adults, the September 11 Attacks and Sars , 2006 .

[10]  Ellen Peters,et al.  The Construction of Preference: The Functions of Affect in the Construction of Preferences , 2006 .

[11]  Eduardo B. Andrade.  Behavioral Consequences of Affect: Combining Evaluative and Regulatory Mechanisms , 2005 .

[12]  Hanna Damasio,et al.  Investment Behavior and the Negative Side of Emotion , 2005, Psychological science.

[13]  Roxana M Gonzalez,et al.  Retraction: Forecasting One’s Future Based on Fleeting Subjective Experiences , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[14]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[15]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Decisions from Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice , 2004, Psychological science.

[16]  N. Schwarz.  Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making , 2004 .

[17]  Deborah A. Small,et al.  Recent EFFECTS OF FEAR AND ANGER ON PERCEIVED RISKS OF TERRORISMA National Field Experiment , 2015 .

[18]  A. Bechara,et al.  Investment Behavior and the Dark Side of Emotion , 2003 .

[19]  J. Russell.  Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. , 2003, Psychological review.

[20]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment , 2002 .

[21]  L. Carstensen,et al.  Time counts: future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[22]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  The measurement of core affect: a Swedish self-report measure derived from the affect circumplex. , 2002, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[23]  D. Hirshleifer,et al.  Good Day Sunshine: Stock Returns and the Weather , 2001 .

[24]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  The Affection Effect in Insurance Decisions , 2006 .

[25]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits , 2000 .

[26]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Judgments of Truth , 1999, Consciousness and Cognition.

[27]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology , 1999 .

[28]  W. Morris,et al.  The mood system. , 1999 .

[29]  F. Strack,et al.  Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. , 1999 .

[30]  R. Reisenzein,et al.  Effects of Mood on Evaluative Judgements: Influence of Reduced Processing Capacity and Mood Salience , 1998 .

[31]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Constructing Perceptions of Vulnerability: Personal Relevance and the Use of Experiential Information in Health Judgments , 1998 .

[32]  Michel Tuan Pham.  Representativeness, Relevance, and the Use of Feelings in Decision Making , 1998 .

[33]  Karen Gasper,et al.  The persistent use of negative affect by anxious individuals to estimate risk. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Research on Judgment and Decision Making: Currents, Connections, and Controversies , 1997 .

[35]  G. Clore,et al.  Feelings and phenomenal experiences , 1996 .

[36]  E. Diener,et al.  Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale , 1993 .

[37]  A. Isen,et al.  Positive affect and decision making. , 1993 .

[38]  Gordon H. Bower,et al.  Mood effects on subjective probability assessment , 1992 .

[39]  E. Diener,et al.  Subjective well-being. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  G. Clore,et al.  Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. , 1983 .

[41]  A. Tversky,et al.  Affect, Generalization, and the Perception of Risk. , 1983 .