Structured dictionary for computations reduction in sparse recovery

One of the main concerns about the signal recovery in compressed sensing (CS) literature is the computational cost which largely depends on the dimensionality of measurement matrix (also named dictionary). In this paper, a simply structured dictionary is designed to reduce the computational cost for the CS signal recovery. The structured dictionary is composed of two parts: pilot part and non-pilot part. By collecting several atoms (i.e., columns of the dictionary) to form a unit and assigning each unit some unique rows of the dictionary, it allows us to exclude certain number of non-supporting atoms by detecting the energy of the corresponding measurements with a theoretically derived threshold. An official CS algorithm is then exploited for more detailed signal recovery with a dictionary of smaller dimensionality. Under some conditions, structured dictionary can even transfer the undetermined CS signal recovery problem to a determined case. Therefore, computational cost can be greatly reduced. The price for the design is a slight sacrifice in recovery accuracy. Based on the existing block orthogonal matching pursuit (BOMP) algorithm, we develop structured BOMP (StBOMP) algorithm. Our numerical study with StBOMP algorithm demonstrates the effectiveness of the designed dictionary in computational cost reduction.

[1]  Thomas L. Marzetta,et al.  Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory , 1976 .

[2]  E.J. Candes,et al.  An Introduction To Compressive Sampling , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[3]  S. Frick,et al.  Compressed Sensing , 2014, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[4]  Huarui Yin,et al.  Many Access for Small Packets Based on Precoding and Sparsity-Aware Recovery , 2016, 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[5]  Volkan Cevher,et al.  Model-Based Compressive Sensing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[6]  Massimo Fornasier,et al.  Compressive Sensing , 2015, Handbook of Mathematical Methods in Imaging.

[7]  H. V. Trees Detection, Estimation, And Modulation Theory , 2001 .

[8]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[9]  R.G. Baraniuk,et al.  Compressive Sensing [Lecture Notes] , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[10]  Gang Li,et al.  Projection matrix optimization for block-sparse compressive sensing , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communication and Computing (ICSPCC 2013).

[11]  Thong T. Do,et al.  Sparsity adaptive matching pursuit algorithm for practical compressed sensing , 2008, 2008 42nd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[12]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Dictionary Optimization for Block-Sparse Representations , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[13]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Neighbor discovery in wireless networks using compressed sensing with Reed-Muller codes , 2011, 2011 International Symposium of Modeling and Optimization of Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks.

[14]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Near-Oracle Performance of Greedy Block-Sparse Estimation Techniques From Noisy Measurements , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[15]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Sensing Matrix Optimization for Block-Sparse Decoding , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[16]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Block-Sparse Signals: Uncertainty Relations and Efficient Recovery , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[17]  Aleksandar Dogandzic,et al.  Sparse Signal Reconstruction via ECME Hard Thresholding , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.