Design elements to improve pleasantness, vitality, safety, and complexity of the pedestrian environment: evidence from a Korean neighbourhood walkability case study

The relationship between walking and the built environment has attracted the attention of many researchers. It is commonly recognized that a more walkable environment enhances walking activities. Although numerous empirical studies have supported that certain design elements have statistically significant effects on walking, many have methodological limitations due to the assumption that the relationship between walking and the built environment is a one-to-one, direct correspondence. To supplement these limitations, this paper embraces a ‘perception’ step in the decision-making process of walking, where perception is not determined by one design element, but by the integration of several elements. Acknowledging four perceptional factors, this paper draws certain design elements of ‘pleasantness’, ‘vitality’, ‘unsafety’, and ‘complexity’ in residential neighbourhoods. Residents in four neighbourhoods completed a questionnaire, from which the following five additional design factors were extracted using factor analysis: sidewalk difficulty, crosswalk difficulty, well-ordered street furniture, poor building design and management, and various walking destinations. The regression analysis indicated that the design factors had statistically significant effects on the four perception factors, which substantiated this paper's hypothesis that walking activities are generated by the combination of several environmental elements, rather than a single attribute. The key study finding is that appropriate design factors are necessary to enhance a certain perception factor: designing and managing street furniture and street buildings induce a high level of pleasantness and vitality. The feeling of unsafety and complexity is mainly driven from the sidewalk and crosswalk difficulty. We expect that the results of this paper will contribute to formulating future guidelines in planning for more walkable neighbourhoods.

[1]  Yeemyung Choi,et al.  Perception of Pedestrian Environment and Satisfaction of Neighborhood Walking - An Impact Study based on Four Residential Communities in Seoul, Korea - , 2009 .

[2]  Marlon G. Boarnet,et al.  The Relationship of Neighbourhood Built Environment Features and Adult Parents' Walking , 2008 .

[3]  Sokijin Choi,et al.  Characteristic Differences of Pedestrian Environments in Residential Neighborhoods , 2008 .

[4]  Sohyun Park,et al.  Measuring Walkability in Urban Residential Neighborhoods: Development of Walkability Indicators, Seoul, Korea , 2008 .

[5]  A. Bauman,et al.  Walkability of local communities: using geographic information systems to objectively assess relevant environmental attributes. , 2007, Health & place.

[6]  Anne Vernez Moudon,et al.  The 3Ds + R: Quantifying Land Use and Urban Form Correlates of Walking , 2006 .

[7]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  Self-Selection in the Relationship between the Built Environment and Walking: Empirical Evidence from Northern California , 2006 .

[8]  J. Sallis,et al.  Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: findings from SMARTRAQ. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[9]  A. Bauman,et al.  Associations of Location and Perceived Environmental Attributes with Walking in Neighborhoods , 2004, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[10]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Relationship between Urban Sprawl and Physical Activity, Obesity, and Morbidity , 2003, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[11]  A. Kriska,et al.  The Relationship between Convenience of Destinations and Walking Levels in Older Women , 2003, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[12]  Ilse de Bourdeaudhuij,et al.  Environmental Correlates of Physical Activity in a Sample of Belgian Adults , 2003, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[13]  J. Sallis,et al.  Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[14]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  Socioeconomic status differences in recreational physical activity levels and real and perceived access to a supportive physical environment. , 2002, Preventive medicine.

[15]  Andrea L Dunn,et al.  Exploring the effect of the environment on physical activity: a study examining walking to work. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[16]  Richard P Troiano,et al.  The association between urban form and physical activity in U.S. adults. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[17]  A. Bauman,et al.  Perceived environmental aesthetics and convenience and company are associated with walking for exercise among Australian adults. , 2001, Preventive medicine.

[18]  A. Bauman,et al.  Social-cognitive and perceived environment influences associated with physical activity in older Australians. , 2000, Preventive medicine.

[19]  J F Sallis,et al.  Promoting physical activity in rural communities: walking trail access, use, and effects. , 2000, American journal of preventive medicine.

[20]  K. Stanilov,et al.  Site Design and Pedestrian Travel , 1999 .

[21]  R. Cervero,et al.  TRAVEL DEMAND AND THE 3DS: DENSITY, DIVERSITY, AND DESIGN , 1997 .

[22]  Anne Vernez Moudon,et al.  A Catholic Approach to Organizing What Urban Designers Should Know , 1992 .

[23]  Jae-On Kim,et al.  Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues , 1978 .

[24]  R. J. Rurimel Understanding factor analysis , 1968 .