Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements

We develop an objective, noninvasive method for determining the frequency selectivity of cochlear tuning at low and moderate sound levels. Applicable in humans at frequencies of 1 kHz and above, the method is based on the measurement of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and, unlike previous noninvasive physiological methods, does not depend on the frequency selectivity of masking or suppression. The otoacoustic measurements indicate that at low sound levels human cochlear tuning is more than twice as sharp as implied by standard behavioral studies and has a different dependence on frequency. New behavioral measurements designed to minimize the influence of nonlinear effects such as suppression agree with the emission-based values. A comparison of cochlear tuning in cat, guinea pig, and human indicates that, contrary to common belief, tuning in the human cochlea is considerably sharper than that found in the other mammals. The sharper tuning may facilitate human speech communication.

[1]  M. Charles Liberman,et al.  Effects of chronic cochlear de-efferentation on auditory-nerve response , 1990, Hearing Research.

[2]  D. Kemp.  Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  E. Owens,et al.  An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1997 .

[4]  G. K. Martin,et al.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a nonhuman primate. II. Cochlear anatomy , 1988, Hearing Research.

[5]  B C Moore.  Parallels between frequency selectivity measured psychophysically and in cochlear mechanics. , 1986, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[6]  B C Moore,et al.  Auditory filter shapes in forward masking as a function of level. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  M F Dorman,et al.  The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6-20 channels. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  G. Zweig.  Basilar membrane motion. , 1976, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[9]  Thomas Baer,et al.  Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing‐impaired and normally hearing people , 1997 .

[10]  Aage R. Møller,et al.  Basic Mechanisms in Hearing , 1973 .

[11]  E de Boer,et al.  Self-suppression in a locally active nonlinear model of the cochlea: a quasilinear approach. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  R. Patterson,et al.  The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  J. Allen,et al.  Harvey Fletcher's role in the creation of communication acoustics. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[15]  So,et al.  An excitation‐pattern model for intensity discrimination , 1981 .

[16]  J. Guinan,et al.  Effect of efferent neural activity on cochlear mechanics. , 1986, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[17]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.

[18]  J. Guinan,et al.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  B. Moore,et al.  Refining the measurement of psychophysical tuning curves. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  M. Ruggero,et al.  Frequency tuning of basilar membrane and auditory nerve fibers in the same cochleae. , 1998, Science.

[21]  J. Pickles,et al.  Psychophysical frequency resolution in the cat as determined by simultaneous masking and its relation to auditory-nerve resolution. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  A.R.D. Thornton,et al.  Foundations of Modern Auditory Theory , 1970 .

[23]  G. Zweig,et al.  The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Roy D. Patterson,et al.  In Auditory Physiology and Perception , 1992 .

[25]  I. Whitfield.  Discharge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cat's Auditory Nerve , 1966 .

[26]  G. K. Yates,et al.  Nonlinear input-output functions derived from the responses of guinea-pig cochlear nerve fibres: Variations with characteristic frequency , 1994, Hearing Research.

[27]  B. Delgutte,et al.  Physiological mechanisms of psychophysical masking: observations from auditory-nerve fibers. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  M. Liberman.  The cochlear frequency map for the cat: labeling auditory-nerve fibers of known characteristic frequency. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  B. Moore,et al.  Frequency selectivity as a function of level and frequency measured with uniformly exciting notched noise. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  D L Neff.  Stimulus parameters governing confusion effects in forward masking. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Suppression and the upward spread of masking. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  D. D. Greenwood.  A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  G. Long,et al.  Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  D. D. Greenwood.  Critical Bandwidth and the Frequency Coordinates of the Basilar Membrane , 1961 .

[35]  T. Irino,et al.  A time-domain, level-dependent auditory filter: The gammachirp , 1997 .

[36]  S Rosen,et al.  Auditory filter nonlinearity at 2 kHz in normal hearing listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  M. Liberman,et al.  Intracellular labeling of auditory nerve fibers in guinea pig: central and peripheral projections , 1997 .

[38]  Alexander Joseph.  Book reviewDischarge patterns of single fibers in the cat's auditory nerve: Nelson Yuan-Sheng Kiang, with the assistance of Takeshi Watanabe, Eleanor C. Thomas and Louise F. Clark: Research Monograph no. 35. Cambridge, Mass., The M.I.T. Press, 1965 , 1967 .

[39]  H Fletcher,et al.  The Mechanism of Hearing as Revealed Through Experiment on the Masking Effect of Thermal Noise. , 1938, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  C. Talmadge,et al.  Interrelations among distortion-product phase-gradient delays: their connection to scaling symmetry and its breaking. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  B C Moore,et al.  Dynamic range and asymmetry of the auditory filter. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.