Nonlinear interior-point optimal power flow method based on a current mismatch formulation

A nonlinear interior-point optimal power flow (OPF) method based on a current mismatch formulation in rectangular coordinates is proposed. In contrast to the classical way of solving the Newton equation that is involved, using a power mismatch formulation, the basic advantage of the proposed method is that, in the current mismatch formulation, some second derivatives become zero and some first derivatives become constant. In current mismatch formulation the elements Hij of the Hessian matrix are zero and the Jacobian elements Jii, Jij, Jji and Jjj are constant whereas in the power mismatch formulation for both cases those elements are functions of the voltage. These features make the computer code simpler. A theoretical comparison between the current mismatch formulation and the power mismatch formulation in rectangular coordinates is presented to point out their differences. Numerical examples on the IEEE 14-bus, IEEE 30-bus, IEEE 57-bus, IEEE 118-bus and IEEE 300-bus systems are presented to illustrate the nonlinear interior-point OPF method based on the current mismatch formulation. Preliminary results indicate that the two methods are comparable in terms of CPU time with the current mismatch formulation method having less computational complexity per iteration.

[1]  B Stott,et al.  Linear Programming for Power-System Network Security Applications , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[2]  H. Happ,et al.  Quadratically Convergent Optimal Power Flow , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[3]  S. Granville Optimal reactive dispatch through interior point methods , 1994 .

[4]  Xiao-Ping Zhang,et al.  Advanced implementation of UPFC in a nonlinear interior-point OPF , 2001 .

[5]  T. Tsuchiya,et al.  On the formulation and theory of the Newton interior-point method for nonlinear programming , 1996 .

[6]  V. Quintana,et al.  A tutorial description of an interior point method and its applications to security-constrained economic dispatch , 1993 .

[7]  William F. Tinney,et al.  Optimal Power Flow Solutions , 1968 .

[8]  G. Irisarri,et al.  Maximum loadability of power systems using interior point nonlinear optimization method , 1997 .

[9]  G. L. Torres,et al.  An interior-point method for nonlinear optimal power flow using voltage rectangular coordinates , 1998 .

[10]  Chan-nan Lu,et al.  Network constrained security control using an interior point algorithm , 1993 .

[11]  Hua Wei,et al.  An interior point nonlinear programming for optimal power flow problems with a novel data structure , 1997 .

[12]  Narendra Karmarkar,et al.  A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming , 1984, Comb..

[13]  R. Adapa,et al.  The quadratic interior point method solving power system optimization problems , 1994 .

[14]  B. Stott,et al.  Further developments in LP-based optimal power flow , 1990 .

[15]  H. Glavitsch,et al.  Quadratic Loss Formula for Reactive Dispatch , 1983, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[16]  A. Monticelli,et al.  Adaptive movement penalty method for the Newton optimal power , 1991, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[17]  R. E. Marsten,et al.  A direct nonlinear predictor-corrector primal-dual interior point algorithm for optimal power flows , 1993 .

[18]  N. Martins,et al.  Developments in the Newton Raphson power flow formulation based on current injections , 1999 .

[19]  K. Xie,et al.  Power market oriented optimal power flow via an interior point method , 2001 .