Aortic size assessment by noncontrast cardiac computed tomography: normal limits by age, gender, and body surface area.

OBJECTIVES To determine normal limits for ascending and descending thoracic aorta diameters in a large population of asymptomatic, low-risk adult subjects. BACKGROUND Assessment of aortic size is possible from gated noncontrast computed tomography (CT) scans obtained for coronary calcium measurements. However, normal limits for aortic size by these studies have yet to be defined. METHODS In 4,039 adult patients undergoing coronary artery calcium (CAC) scanning, systematic measurements of the ascending and descending thoracic aorta diameters were made at the level of the pulmonary artery bifurcation. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to detect risk factors independently associated with ascending and descending thoracic aorta diameter and exclude subjects with these parameters from the final analysis. The final analysis groups for ascending and descending thoracic aorta included 2,952 and 1,931 subjects, respectively. Subjects were then regrouped by gender, age, and body surface area (BSA) for ascending and descending aorta, separately, and for each group, the mean, standard deviation, and upper normal limit were calculated for aortic diameter as well as for the calculated cross-sectional aortic area. Also, linear regression models were used to create BSA versus aortic diameter nomograms by age groups, and a formula for calculating predicted aortic size by age, gender, and BSA was created. RESULTS Age, BSA, gender, and hypertension were directly associated with thoracic aorta dimensions. Additionally, diabetes was associated with ascending aorta diameter, and smoking was associated with descending aorta diameter. The mean diameters for the final analysis group were 33 +/- 4 mm for the ascending and 24 +/- 3 mm for the descending thoracic aorta, respectively. The corresponding upper limits of normal diameters were 41 and 30 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Normal limits of ascending and descending aortic dimensions by noncontrast gated cardiac CT have been defined by age, gender, and BSA in a large, low-risk population of subjects undergoing CAC scanning.

[1]  K. Furie,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2008, Circulation.

[2]  J. Mckenney,et al.  Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). , 2001, JAMA.

[3]  D F Guthaner,et al.  CT demonstration of cardiac structures. , 1979, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  S. Sagel,et al.  Normal thoracic aortic diameters by computed tomography. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  John Hess,et al.  Diameters of the thoracic aorta throughout life as measured with helical computed tomography. , 2002, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[6]  J. Elefteriades Natural history of thoracic aortic aneurysms: indications for surgery, and surgical versus nonsurgical risks. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  K. Furie,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2007, Circulation.

[8]  R. Mohiaddin,et al.  MR Imaging of Age‐Related Dimensional Changes of Thoracic Aorta , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  Richard A. Kronmal,et al.  Distribution of Coronary Artery Calcium by Race, Gender, and Age: Results from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) , 2005, Circulation.

[10]  R. Devereux,et al.  Two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in normal children and adults. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  Mosteller Rd Simplified Calculation of Body-Surface Area , 1987 .

[12]  C. Higgins,et al.  MR Imaging of the Thoracic Aorta in Marfan Patients , 1987, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[13]  R. Erbel,et al.  Measurement of intracardiac dimensions and structures in normal young adult subjects by transesophageal echocardiography. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  Eric M. Isselbacher,et al.  Thoracic and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms , 2005, Circulation.

[15]  D J Ballard,et al.  Prevalence and Associations of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detected through Screening , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  A. Tajik,et al.  Is aortic dilatation an atherosclerosis-related process? Clinical, laboratory, and transesophageal echocardiographic correlates of thoracic aortic dimensions in the population with implications for thoracic aortic aneurysm formation. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  C. Higgins,et al.  Thoracic Imaging: Pulmonary and Cardiovascular Radiology , 2004 .

[18]  Michael H. Kutner Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[19]  N. Unwin,et al.  Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National , 2009 .

[20]  R. O’rahilly,et al.  Book ReviewNeuroanatomy: An atlas of structures, sections and systems , 1987 .

[21]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .