Closed form constitutive relationship for concrete filled FRP tubes under compression

Abstract Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) tubes filled with concrete are very effective structural elements when loaded under axial stress. The exterior jacket of FRP, in fact, confines the inner concrete and significantly enhances both its resistance and stiffness. On the other hand FRP protects the inner core from temperature and humidity effects, and may also be used both as formwork and as reinforcement. Nonetheless, stability problems arise when FRP tubes are used as slender structural elements. Although the physical behavior of a straight structural element is simple, state-of-the-art models on one side do not deal explicitly with instability effects, on the other do not offer closed form solutions for the longitudinal constitutive relationship. Both aspects are solved and validated in this work. First a closed form constitutive relationship for concrete filled FRP tubes is developed. Departing from this solution, the critical load is computed in closed form. Secondly, the constitutive models for squat and slender tubes are validated against experimental results and compared with other state-of-the-art models. Design charts for FRP tubes under compression including buckling are obtained as a function of the most important variables and used to verify example elements. The proposed model shows a good capability of describing the behavior of FRP-concrete tubes, while being simple to use, expressed in a closed form and hence computationally fast.

[1]  Jian Fei Chen,et al.  Structural behaviour of short steel—concrete composite spun tubular columns , 2000 .

[2]  J. Mander,et al.  Theoretical stress strain model for confined concrete , 1988 .

[3]  L. C. Hollaway,et al.  Advanced Polymer Composites and Polymers in the Civil Infrastructure , 2001 .

[4]  N. J. Gardner,et al.  Triaxial Behavior of Concrete , 1969 .

[5]  Robert Park,et al.  Strength of Concrete Filled Steel Tubular Columns , 1969 .

[6]  Stavroula J. Pantazopoulou,et al.  MICROSTRUCTURAL ASPECTS OF THE MECHANICAL RESPONSE OF PLAIN CONCRETE , 1995 .

[7]  J. Teng,et al.  Strength Models for Fiber-Reinforced Plastic-Confined Concrete , 2002 .

[8]  M. R. Spoelstra,et al.  FRP-Confined Concrete Model , 2001 .

[9]  M. Fardis,et al.  FRP-encased concrete as a structural material , 1982 .

[10]  Surendra P. Shah,et al.  Stress-Strain Curves of Concrete Confined by Spiral Reinforcement , 1982 .

[11]  L. Taerwe,et al.  Compressive behavior of FRP reinforcement in non-prestressed concrete members , 2004 .

[12]  N Kawaguchi,et al.  Ultimate Strength and Deformation Characteristics of Concrete Members Reinforced with AFRP Rods Under Combined Axial Tension or Compression and Bending , 1993, SP-138: Fiber-Reinforced-Plastic Reinforcement for Concrete Structures - International Symposium.

[13]  Amir Mirmiran,et al.  Model of Concrete Confined by Fiber Composites , 1998 .

[14]  Scott T. Smith,et al.  FRP: Strengthened RC Structures , 2001 .

[15]  T. Paulay,et al.  Reinforced Concrete Structures , 1975 .

[16]  Sami H. Rizkalla,et al.  Confinement Model for Axially Loaded Concrete Confined by Circular Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Tubes , 2001 .

[17]  Juan Carlos Mastrapa.  The effect of construction bond on confinement with frp composites , 1997 .

[18]  F. L. Matthews,et al.  Composite Materials : Engineering and Science , 1993 .