Genomic imprinting and the differential roles of parental genomes in brain development.

Certain genes are expressed either from the maternal or the paternal genome as a result of genomic imprinting, a process that confers functional differences on parental genomes during mammalian development. In this study we focus on the cumulative effects of imprinted genes on brain development by examining the fate of androgenetic (Ag: duplicated paternal genome) and parthenogenetic/gynogenetic (Pg/Gg: duplicated maternal genome) cells in chimeric embryos. Striking cell autonomous differences in the phenotypic properties of the uniparental cells were observed. Ag cells contributed substantially to the hypothalamic structures and not the cortex. By contrast, Pg/Gg cells contributed substantially to the cortex, striatum and hippocampus but not to the hypothalamic structures. Furthermore growth of the brain was enhanced by Pg/Gg and retarded by Ag cells. We propose that genomic imprinting may be responsible for a change in strategy controlling brain development in mammals. In particular, genomic imprinting may have facilitated a rapid non-linear expansion of the brain, especially the cortex, during development over evolutionary time.

[1]  R. Weksberg,et al.  Disruption of insulin–like growth factor 2 imprinting in Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome , 1993, Nature genetics.

[2]  D. J. Driscoll,et al.  Modification of 15q11-q13 DNA methylation imprints in unique Angelman and Prader-Willi patients. , 1993, Human molecular genetics.

[3]  M. Surani,et al.  Systematic elimination of parthenogenetic cells in mouse chimeras. , 1989, Development.

[4]  M. Surani,et al.  Nuclear transplantation in the mouse: Heritable differences between parental genomes after activation of the embryonic genome , 1986, Cell.

[5]  B. Cattanach,et al.  Differential activity of maternally and paternally derived chromosome regions in mice , 1985, Nature.

[6]  B. Cattanach,et al.  Autosomal and X-chromosome imprinting. , 1990, Development (Cambridge, England). Supplement.

[7]  C. Stewart,et al.  Androgenetic mouse embryonic stem cells are pluripotent and cause skeletal defects in chimeras: Implications for genetic imprinting , 1990, Cell.

[8]  G. Morata,et al.  Are cross-regulatory interactions between homoeotic genes functionally significant? , 1990, Nature.

[9]  J. Rossant,et al.  The development potential of parthenogenetically derived cells in chimeric mouse embryos: implications for action of imprinted genes. , 1988, Development.

[10]  M. Surani,et al.  Influence of paternally imprinted genes on development. , 1991, Development.

[11]  M. Eccles,et al.  Relaxation of insulin-like growth factor II gene imprinting implicated in Wilms' tumour , 1993, Nature.

[12]  M. Surani,et al.  Developmental consequences of imprinting of parental chromosomes by DNA methylation. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[13]  J C Honeyman,et al.  Angelman and Prader-Willi syndrome: a magnetic resonance imaging study of differences in cerebral structure. , 1993, American journal of medical genetics.

[14]  Y. Shugart,et al.  Maternal but not paternal transmission of 15q11–13–linked nondeletion Angelman syndrome leads to phenotypic expression , 1992, Nature Genetics.

[15]  A. Efstratiadis,et al.  Parental imprinting of autosomal mammalian genes. , 1994, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[16]  A. Nagy,et al.  Systematic non-uniform distribution of parthenogenetic cells in adult mouse chimaeras. , 1989, Development.

[17]  P. Rakic.  A small step for the cell, a giant leap for mankind: a hypothesis of neocortical expansion during evolution , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  C. Lo.  Localization of low abundance DNA sequences in tissue sections by in situ hybridization. , 1986, Journal of cell science.

[19]  J. Knoll,et al.  Genetic imprinting suggested by maternal heterodisomy in non-deletion Prader-Willi syndrome , 1989, Nature.

[20]  R. Nicholls.  Genomic imprinting and candidate genes in the Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes. , 1993, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[21]  T. Moore,et al.  Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war. , 1991, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[22]  M. Monk.  Mammalian Development: A Practical Approach , 1988, Development.

[23]  S. Leff,et al.  Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide N (SNRPN), an expressed gene in the Prader–Willi syndrome critical region , 1992, Nature Genetics.

[24]  E. Keverne,et al.  A position-dependent transgene reveals patterns of gene expression in the developing brain. , 1990, Brain research. Developmental brain research.

[25]  M. Surani,et al.  Embryological and molecular investigations of parental imprinting on mouse chromosome 7 , 1991, Nature.

[26]  A. Efstratiadis,et al.  A growth-deficiency phenotype in heterozygous mice carrying an insulin-like growth factor II gene disrupted by targeting , 1990, Nature.

[27]  M. Surani,et al.  Experimental embryological analysis of genetic imprinting in mouse development. , 1994, Developmental genetics.

[28]  R. Kothary,et al.  Parthenogenetic stem cells in postnatal mouse chimeras. , 1992, Development.

[29]  D. Barlow,et al.  The mouse insulin-like growth factor type-2 receptor is imprinted and closely linked to the Tme locus , 1991, Nature.

[30]  D. Solter.  Differential imprinting and expression of maternal and paternal genomes. , 1988, Annual review of genetics.

[31]  Philippe Soriano,et al.  Promoter traps in embryonic stem cells: a genetic screen to identify and mutate developmental genes in mice. , 1991, Genes & development.

[32]  A. Joyner,et al.  Genomic imprinting of Mash2, a mouse gene required for trophoblast development , 1995, Nature Genetics.