Performance of polyethyleneimine–silica adsorbent for post-combustion CO2 capture in a bubbling fluidized bed

The high performance of polyethyleneimine (PEI)-based solid adsorbent for CO2 capture has been well recognized in thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and small-scale fixed bed reactors through the measurements of their equilibrium capacities but has not been really demonstrated on larger scales towards practical utilization. In the present study, a laboratory-scale bubbling fluidized bed reactor loaded with a few kg adsorbent is used to evaluate the adsorption performance of PEI–silica adsorbent under different working conditions including with/without the presence of moisture, different gas–solid contact times, initial bed temperatures, and CO2 partial pressures. The adsorption capacities have shown a clear degradation tendency under dry condition. However, they can be stabilized at a high level of 10.6–11.1% w/w over 60 cycles if moisture (ca. 8.8 vol%) is present in the gas flow during adsorption and desorption. Breakthrough capacities can be stabilized at the level of 7.6–8.2% w/w with the gas–solid contact time of 13 s. The adsorption capacities for the simulated flue gases containing 5% CO2 are only slightly lower than those for the simulated flue gases containing 15% CO2, indicating that the PEI–silica adsorbent is suitable for CO2 capture from flue gases of both coal-fired and natural gas-fired combined cycle power plants. The exothermal heat of adsorption is estimated by the energy balance in the fluidized bed reactor and found to be close (within 10%) to the measured value by TG-DSC. The regeneration heat for the as prepared PEI–silica adsorbent is found to be 2360 kJ/kgCO2 assuming 75% recovery of sensible heat which is well below the values of 3900–4500 kJ/kgCO2 for a typical MEA scrubbing process with 90% recovery of sensible heat.

[1]  François Renard,et al.  Gas-solid carbonation of Ca(OH)2 and CaO particles under non-isothermal and isothermal conditions by using a thermogravimetric analyzer: Implications for CO2 capture , 2012 .

[2]  J. Poston,et al.  Adsorption of CO2 on molecular sieves and activated carbon , 2001 .

[3]  Covadonga Pevida,et al.  CO2 capture by adsorption with nitrogen enriched carbons , 2007 .

[4]  Jihyun An,et al.  High and selective CO2 uptake in a cobalt adeninate metal-organic framework exhibiting pyrimidine- and amino-decorated pores. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[5]  Holly Krutka,et al.  Evaluation of solid sorbents as a retrofit technology for CO2 capture , 2010 .

[6]  Abhoyjit S. Bhown,et al.  Comparing physisorption and chemisorption solid sorbents for use separating CO2 from flue gas using temperature swing adsorption , 2011 .

[7]  Youssef Belmabkhout,et al.  Stabilization of amine-containing CO(2) adsorbents: dramatic effect of water vapor. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[8]  Hao Liu,et al.  Capturing CO2 from ambient air using a polyethyleneimine–silica adsorbent in fluidized beds , 2014 .

[9]  D. Brilman,et al.  Post-Combustion CO2 capture using supported amine sorbents: A process integration study , 2013 .

[10]  Christopher W. Jones,et al.  Steam-stripping for regeneration of supported amine-based CO(2) adsorbents. , 2010, ChemSusChem.

[11]  Colin E. Snape,et al.  Thermal stability of polyethylenimine based carbon dioxide adsorbents and its influence on selection of regeneration strategies , 2008 .

[12]  K. J. Champagne,et al.  Parametric Study of Solid Amine Sorbents for the Capture of Carbon Dioxide , 2009 .

[13]  Armin D. Ebner,et al.  Suitability of a Solid Amine Sorbent for CO2 Capture by Pressure Swing Adsorption , 2011 .

[14]  Christopher W. Jones,et al.  Designing adsorbents for CO2 capture from flue gas-hyperbranched aminosilicas capable of capturing CO2 reversibly. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[15]  M. O. Garg,et al.  Carbon Di-Oxide Removal with Mesoporous Adsorbents in a Single Column Pressure Swing Adsorber , 2009 .

[16]  Sharon Sjostrom,et al.  Pilot test results of post-combustion CO2 capture using solid sorbents , 2011 .

[17]  M. Kharoune,et al.  Advances in principal factors influencing carbon dioxide adsorption on zeolites , 2008, Science and technology of advanced materials.

[18]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Evaluation of potential cost reductions from improved amine-based CO2 capture systems , 2006 .

[19]  Adrien Gomez,et al.  A theoretical analysis of the energy consumption of post-combustion CO2 capture processes by temperature swing adsorption using solid sorbents , 2013 .

[20]  Yuan Chun,et al.  CO2 Capture by As‐Prepared SBA‐15 with an Occluded Organic Template , 2006 .

[21]  Shih-Chun Kuo,et al.  Adsorption of CO2 on Amine-Functionalized Y-Type Zeolites , 2010 .

[22]  Xiaoliang Ma,et al.  "Molecular basket" sorbents for separation of CO(2) and H(2)S from various gas streams. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[23]  A. Scaroni,et al.  Influence of Moisture on CO2 Separation from Gas Mixture by a Nanoporous Adsorbent Based on Polyethylenimine-Modified Molecular Sieve MCM-41 , 2005 .

[24]  A. Steinfeld,et al.  Kinetic analysis of the carbonation reactions for the capture of CO2 from air via the Ca(OH)2–CaCO3–CaO solar thermochemical cycle , 2007 .

[25]  G. Versteeg,et al.  CO2 capture from power plants. Part I: A parametric study of the technical performance based on monoethanolamine , 2007 .

[26]  I. Langmuir THE CONSTITUTION AND FUNDAMENTAL PROPERTIES OF SOLIDS AND LIQUIDS , 1917 .

[27]  Christopher W. Jones,et al.  Adsorbent Materials for Carbon Dioxide Capture from Large Anthropogenic Point Sources , 2010 .

[28]  Irving Langmuir,et al.  The constitution and fundamental properties of solids and liquids. Part II.—Liquids , 1917 .

[29]  Bruce G. Miller,et al.  Novel Polyethylenimine-Modified Mesoporous Molecular Sieve of MCM-41 Type as High-Capacity Adsorbent for CO2 Capture , 2002 .

[30]  Factors in reactor design for carbon dioxide capture with solid, regenerable sorbents , 2008 .

[31]  Won-Jin Son,et al.  Adsorptive removal of carbon dioxide using polyethyleneimine-loaded mesoporous silica materials , 2008 .

[32]  Hsunling Bai,et al.  Comparative Study of CO2 Capture by Carbon Nanotubes, Activated Carbons, and Zeolites , 2008 .

[33]  Frank Zeman,et al.  Experimental results for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere , 2008 .

[34]  Randall Q Snurr,et al.  Screening of metal-organic frameworks for carbon dioxide capture from flue gas using a combined experimental and modeling approach. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[35]  Youssef Belmabkhout,et al.  Influence of regeneration conditions on the cyclic performance of amine-grafted mesoporous silica for CO2 capture: An experimental and statistical study , 2010 .

[36]  Wen-Ching Yang,et al.  Exploratory Design Study on Reactor Configurations for Carbon Dioxide Capture from Conventional Power Plants Employing Regenerable Solid Sorbents , 2009 .

[37]  Covadonga Pevida,et al.  Preparation of carbon dioxide adsorbents from the chemical activation of urea–formaldehyde and melamine–formaldehyde resins , 2007 .

[38]  Borja Arias,et al.  Different Approaches for the Development of Low-Cost CO2 Adsorbents , 2009 .

[39]  Sascha R.A. Kersten,et al.  Continuous CO2 capture in a circulating fluidized bed using supported amine sorbents , 2012 .

[40]  Youssef Belmabkhout,et al.  Effect of pore expansion and amine functionalization of mesoporous silica on CO2 adsorption over a wide range of conditions , 2009 .

[41]  P. Fennell,et al.  Reactivation of CaO-Based Sorbents for CO2 Capture: Mechanism for the Carbonation of Ca(OH)2 , 2011 .

[42]  Wen-ching Yang Handbook of Fluidization and Fluid-Particle Systems , 2003 .