A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Study Comparing the Tolerability and Efficacy of Ipilimumab Administered with or without Prophylactic Budesonide in Patients with Unresectable Stage III or IV Melanoma

Purpose: Diarrhea (with or without colitis) is an immune-related adverse event (irAE) associated with ipilimumab. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, multinational phase II trial was conducted to determine whether prophylactic budesonide (Entocort EC), a nonabsorbed oral steroid, reduced the rate of grade ≥2 diarrhea in ipilimumab-treated patients with advanced melanoma. Experimental Design: Previously treated and treatment-naïve patients (N = 115) with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma received open-label ipilimumab (10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses) with daily blinded budesonide (group A) or placebo (group B) through week 16. The first scheduled tumor evaluation was at week 12; eligible patients received maintenance treatment starting at week 24. Diarrhea was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 3.0. Patients kept a diary describing their bowel habits. Results: Budesonide did not affect the rate of grade ≥2 diarrhea, which occurred in 32.7% and 35.0% of patients in groups A and B, respectively. There were no bowel perforations or treatment-related deaths. Best overall response rates were 12.1% in group A and 15.8% in group B, with a median overall survival of 17.7 and 19.3 months, respectively. Within each group, the disease control rate was higher in patients with grade 3 to 4 irAEs than in patients with grade 0 to 2 irAEs, although many patients with grade 1 to 2 irAEs experienced clinical benefit. Novel patterns of response to ipilimumab were observed. Conclusions: Ipilimumab shows activity in advanced melanoma, with encouraging survival and manageable adverse events. Budesonide should not be used prophylactically for grade ≥2 diarrhea associated with ipilimumab therapy. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(17):5591–8)

[1]  S. O’Day,et al.  Phase I/II study of ipilimumab for patients with metastatic melanoma. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  H. Pehamberger,et al.  Novel efficacy criteria for antitumor activity to immunotherapy using the example of ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody , 2008 .

[3]  H. Pehamberger,et al.  Efficacy and safety of ipilimumab induction and maintenance dosing in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed on one or more prior therapies , 2008 .

[4]  A. Pavlick,et al.  Disease control and long-term survival in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced melanoma treated with ipilimumab (MDX- 010) with or without dacarbazine , 2008 .

[5]  S. Chasalow,et al.  Potential immune biomarkers of gastrointestinal toxicities and efficacy in patients with advanced melanoma treated with ipilimumab with or without prophylactic budesonide , 2008 .

[6]  G. Linette,et al.  Dose effect of ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma: Results from a phase II, randomized, dose-ranging study , 2008 .

[7]  F. Hodi,et al.  Prolonged survival in objective responders to ipilimumab therapy , 2008 .

[8]  A. Hauschild,et al.  Phase III, open-label, randomized, comparative study of tremelimumab (CP-675,206) and chemotherapy (temozolomide [TMZ] or dacarbazine [DTIC]) in patients with advanced melanoma , 2008 .

[9]  I. Lowy,et al.  An analysis of the effectiveness of specific guidelines for the management of ipilimumab-mediated diarrhea/colitis: Prevention of gastrointestinal perforation and/or colectomy , 2008 .

[10]  S. O’Day,et al.  Long-term survival of patients with advanced melanoma who received ipilimumab administered at 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 doses (induction dosing) , 2008 .

[11]  J. Wolchok,et al.  Antitumor response and new lesions in advanced melanoma patients on ipilimumab treatment , 2008 .

[12]  U. Iloeje,et al.  Real-world patterns of systemic therapy utilization in high risk and metastatic melanoma: evidence from the SEER-Medicare linked database , 2008 .

[13]  U. Iloeje,et al.  PCN96 REAL WORLD TREATMENT PATTERNS IN HIGH RISK OR METASTATIC MELANOMA: EVIDENCE FROM THE SEER-MEDICARE LINKED DATABASE , 2008 .

[14]  Donna Niedzwiecki,et al.  Meta-analysis of phase II cooperative group trials in metastatic stage IV melanoma to determine progression-free and overall survival benchmarks for future phase II trials. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  M. Gordon Enterocolitis in Patients With Cancer After Antibody Blockade of Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte–Associated Antigen 4 , 2008 .

[16]  J. Wolchok,et al.  The heterogeneity of the kinetics of response to ipilimumab in metastatic melanoma: patient cases. , 2008, Cancer immunity.

[17]  S. O’Day,et al.  Targeting cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte antigen‐4 (CTLA‐4) , 2007, Cancer.

[18]  J. Kirkwood,et al.  Management of metastatic melanoma. , 2007, Seminars in oncology.

[19]  S. Steinberg,et al.  Prognostic Factors Related to Clinical Response in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Treated by CTL-Associated Antigen-4 Blockade , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[20]  M. Morse,et al.  Update on anti-CTLA-4 antibodies in clinical trials , 2007, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[21]  J. Weber Review: anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab: case studies of clinical response and immune-related adverse events. , 2007, The oncologist.

[22]  F. Hodi,et al.  Kinetics of response to ipilimumab (MDX-010) in patients with stage III/IV melanoma , 2007 .

[23]  S. O’Day,et al.  The efficacy and safety of ipilimumab (MDX-010) in patients with unresectable stage III or stage IV malignant melanoma , 2007 .

[24]  A. Korman,et al.  Efficacy of anti-CTLA-4 antibody in the SA1N tumor model when combined with dexamethasone , 2007 .

[25]  H. Pehamberger,et al.  Bcl-2 antisense (oblimersen sodium) plus dacarbazine in patients with advanced melanoma: the Oblimersen Melanoma Study Group. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  Intrapatient Dose Escalation of Anti–CTLA-4 Antibody in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma , 2006, Journal of immunotherapy.

[27]  A. Feldman,et al.  Enterocolitis in patients with cancer after antibody blockade of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  S. Quezada,et al.  Principles and use of anti-CTLA4 antibody in human cancer immunotherapy. , 2006, Current opinion in immunology.

[29]  S. O’Day,et al.  Management of metastatic melanoma 2005. , 2006, Surgical oncology clinics of North America.

[30]  M. Morse Technology evaluation: ipilimumab, Medarex/Bristol-Myers Squibb. , 2005, Current opinion in molecular therapeutics.

[31]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  Glucocorticoids Do Not Inhibit Antitumor Activity of Activated CD8+ T Cells , 2005, Journal of immunotherapy.

[32]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  Tumor Regression and Autoimmunity in Patients Treated With Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte–Associated Antigen 4 Blockade and Interleukin 2: A Phase I/II Study , 2005, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[33]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  Autoimmunity correlates with tumor regression in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  A. Korman,et al.  Tumor immunotherapy: preclinical and clinical activity of anti-CTLA4 antibodies. , 2005, Current opinion in investigational drugs.

[35]  S. Groshen,et al.  Autoimmunity in a phase I trial of a fully human anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 monoclonal antibody with multiple melanoma peptides and Montanide ISA 51 for patients with resected stages III and IV melanoma. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[36]  Melanoma: treatment guidelines for patients (part 2). , 2005, Dermatology nursing.

[37]  J. Kirkwood,et al.  Re-evaluating the role of dacarbazine in metastatic melanoma: what have we learned in 30 years? , 2004, European journal of cancer.

[38]  T. Andersson,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of Budesonide (Entocort™ EC) Capsules for Crohn’s Disease , 2004, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[39]  Thomas A. Davis,et al.  Cancer regression and autoimmunity induced by cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  P. Wollmer,et al.  A pharmacoscintigraphic evaluation of oral budesonide given as controlled‐release (Entocort) capsules , 2003, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[41]  K. Goa,et al.  Budesonide (Entocort EC Capsules): a review of its therapeutic use in the management of active Crohn's disease in adults. , 2002, Drugs.

[42]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Randomized phase III study of temozolomide versus dacarbazine in the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic malignant melanoma. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[43]  C. Begg,et al.  Phase III multicenter randomized trial of the Dartmouth regimen versus dacarbazine in patients with metastatic melanoma. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[44]  R. Fisher,et al.  High-dose recombinant interleukin 2 therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma: analysis of 270 patients treated between 1985 and 1993. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[45]  J. Allison,et al.  Enhancement of Antitumor Immunity by CTLA-4 Blockade , 1996, Science.

[46]  Ron Brookmeyer,et al.  A Confidence Interval for the Median Survival Time , 1982 .

[47]  W. Haenszel,et al.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. , 1959, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[48]  E. S. Pearson,et al.  THE USE OF CONFIDENCE OR FIDUCIAL LIMITS ILLUSTRATED IN THE CASE OF THE BINOMIAL , 1934 .