Detection of potato brown rot and ring rot by electronic nose: from laboratory to real scale.

A commercial electronic nose (e-nose) equipped with a metal oxide sensor array was trained to recognize volatile compounds emitted by potatoes experimentally infected with Ralstonia solanacearum or Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus, which are bacterial agents of potato brown and ring rot, respectively. Two sampling procedures for volatile compounds were tested on pooled tubers sealed in 0.5-1 L jars at room temperature (laboratory conditions): an enrichment unit containing different adsorbent materials (namely, Tenax(®) TA, Carbotrap, Tenax(®) GR, and Carboxen 569) directly coupled with the e-nose (active sampling) and a Radiello(™) cartridge (passive sampling) containing a generic Carbograph fiber. Tenax(®) TA resulted the most suitable adsorbent material for active sampling. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) correctly classified 57.4 and 81.3% total samples as healthy or diseased, when using active and passive sampling, respectively. These results suggested the use of passive sampling to discriminate healthy from diseased tubers under intermediate and real scale conditions. 80 and 90% total samples were correctly classified by LDA under intermediate (100 tubers stored at 4°C in net bag passively sampled) and real scale conditions (tubers stored at 4°C in 1.25 t bags passively sampled). Principal component analysis (PCA) of sensorial analysis data under laboratory conditions highlighted a strict relationship between the disease severity and the responses of the e-nose sensors, whose sensitivity threshold was linked to the presence of at least one tuber per sample showing medium disease symptoms. At intermediate and real scale conditions, data distribution agreed with disease incidence (percentage of diseased tubers), owing to the low storage temperature and volatile compounds unconfinement conditions adopted.

[1]  K. Pastrik,et al.  Detection of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus in Potato Tubers by Multiplex PCR with Coamplification of Host DNA , 2000, European Journal of Plant Pathology.

[2]  K. Persaud,et al.  Analysis of discrimination mechanisms in the mammalian olfactory system using a model nose , 1982, Nature.

[3]  Joachim Müller,et al.  Volatile organic compounds as a diagnostic marker of late blight infected potato plants: A pilot study , 2010 .

[4]  R. Brereton,et al.  Comparison of performance of five common classifiers represented as boundary methods: Euclidean Distance to Centroids, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Quadratic Discriminant Analysis, Learning Vector Quantization and Support Vector Machines, as dependent on data structure , 2009 .

[5]  Richard J. Ewen,et al.  The development of a sensor system for the early detection of soft rot in stored potato tubers , 2000 .

[6]  Limin Zhu,et al.  Flavor analysis in a pharmaceutical oral solution formulation using an electronic-nose. , 2004, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[7]  Michael P. Craven,et al.  The prediction of bacteria type and culture growth phase by an electronic nose with a multi-layer perceptron network , 1998 .

[8]  Jerry L. Varns,et al.  Detection of disease in stored potatoes by volatile monitoring , 1979, American Potato Journal.

[9]  M. Falasconi,et al.  Differentiation of the volatile profile of microbiologically contaminated canned tomatoes by dynamic headspace extraction followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. , 2009, Talanta.

[10]  A. Vikram,et al.  Discrimination of three fungal diseases of potato tubers based on volatile metabolic profiles developed using GC/MS , 2007, Potato Research.

[11]  J. Yinon,et al.  Peer Reviewed: Detection of Explosives by Electronic Noses , 2003 .

[12]  Ratcliffe,et al.  Identification of volatiles generated by potato tubers (Solanum tuberosum CV: Maris Piper) infected by Erwinia carotovora, Bacillus polymyxa and Arthrobacter sp. , 1999 .

[13]  M. K. Pritchard,et al.  Production of volatile metabolites in potatoes infected by Erwinia carotovora var. carotovora and E. carotovora var. atroseptica , 1985 .

[14]  E. Biondi,et al.  Electronic nose as an innovative tool for the diagnosis of grapevine crown gall. , 2010, Analytica chimica acta.

[15]  P. Müller Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus , 2006 .

[16]  M. Peris,et al.  A 21st century technique for food control: electronic noses. , 2009, Analytica chimica acta.

[17]  M. Forina,et al.  Chemometrics for analytical chemistry , 1992 .

[18]  H. Barr,et al.  An intelligent rapid odour recognition model in discrimination of Helicobacter pylori and other gastroesophageal isolates in vitro. , 2000, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[19]  S. Cristescu,et al.  Identification of volatile markers in potato brown rot and ring rot by combined GC-MS and PTR-MS techniques: study on in vitro and in vivo samples. , 2014, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[20]  R. Negri,et al.  Electronic nose based discrimination of a perfumery compound in a fragrance , 2003 .

[21]  A. D. Wilson,et al.  Review of electronic-nose technologies and algorithms to detect hazardous chemicals in the environment , 2012 .

[22]  J. Young,et al.  Differentiation of Pseudomonas solanacearum, Pseudomonas syzygii, Pseudomonas pickettii and the Blood Disease Bacterium by partial 16S rRNA sequencing: construction of oligonucleotide primers for sensitive detection by polymerase chain reaction. , 1993, Journal of general microbiology.

[23]  Francesco Spinelli,et al.  Potential of the electronic-nose for the diagnosis of bacterial and fungal diseases in fruit trees , 2010 .

[24]  Murat O. Balaban,et al.  Discrimination of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Using an electronicronic Nose , 2004 .

[25]  Randall D. Tobias,et al.  Chemometrics: A Practical Guide , 1998, Technometrics.

[26]  K. Persaud,et al.  Generic system for the detection of statutory potato pathogens , 2006 .