Bayesian time delay interferometry

Laser frequency noise (LFN) is the dominant source of noise expected in the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) mission, at ∼7 orders of magnitude greater than the typical signal expected from gravitational waves (GWs). Time-delay interferometry (TDI) suppresses LFN to an acceptable level by linearly combining measurements from individual spacecraft delayed by durations that correspond to their relative separations. Knowledge of the delay durations is crucial for TDI effectiveness. The work reported here extends upon previous studies using data-driven methods for inferring the delays during the post-processing of raw phasemeter data, also known as TDI ranging (TDIR). Our TDIR analysis uses Bayesian methods designed to ultimately be included in the LISA data model as part of a “Global Fit” analysis pipeline. Including TDIR as part of the Global Fit produces GW inferences which are marginalized over uncertainty in the spacecraft separations and allows for independent estimation of the spacecraft orbits. We demonstrate Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) inferences of the six time-independent delays required in the rigidly rotating approximation of the spacecraft configuration (TDI 1.5) using simulated data. The MCMC uses fractional delay interpolation (FDI) to digitally delay the raw phase meter data, and we study the sensitivity of the analysis to the filter length. Varying levels of complexity in the noise covariance matrix are also examined. Delay estimations are found to result in LFN suppression well below the level of secondary noises and constraints on the armlengths to O(30) cm over the ∼2.5 Gm baseline.

[1]  Time-delay interferometry without delays , 2021 .

[2]  Jean-Baptiste Bayle,et al.  Adapting time-delay interferometry for LISA data in frequency , 2021, Physical Review D.

[3]  J. Thorpe,et al.  Statistical inference approach to time-delay interferometry for gravitational-wave detection , 2020, Physical Review D.

[4]  T. Littenberg,et al.  Global analysis of the gravitational wave signal from Galactic binaries , 2020, Physical Review D.

[5]  M. Muratore,et al.  Revisitation of time delay interferometry combinations that suppress laser noise in LISA , 2020, Classical and Quantum Gravity.

[6]  A. Petiteau,et al.  Effect of filters on the time-delay interferometry residual laser noise for LISA , 2018, Physical Review D.

[7]  P. Lasky,et al.  Bilby: A User-friendly Bayesian Inference Library for Gravitational-wave Astronomy , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[8]  Neil J. Cornish,et al.  Bayesian inference for spectral estimation of gravitational wave detector noise , 2014, 1410.3852.

[9]  P. Graff,et al.  Parameter estimation for compact binaries with ground-based gravitational-wave observations using the LALInference software library , 2014, 1409.7215.

[10]  Neil J. Cornish,et al.  Bayeswave: Bayesian inference for gravitational wave bursts and instrument glitches , 2014, 1410.3835.

[11]  K. Danzmann,et al.  First stage of LISA data processing: Clock synchronization and arm-length determination via a hybrid-extended Kalman filter , 2014, 1402.6222.

[12]  K. Danzmann,et al.  TDI and clock noise removal for the split interferometry configuration of LISA , 2012 .

[13]  L. G. Boté,et al.  Laser Interferometer Space Antenna , 2012 .

[14]  M. Vallisneri,et al.  Time-delay interferometric ranging for space-borne gravitational-wave detectors , 2004, gr-qc/0410122.

[15]  Massimo Tinto,et al.  Time delay interferometry , 2003, Living Reviews in Relativity.

[16]  Robert Eliot Spero,et al.  Postprocessed time-delay interferometry for LISA , 2004, gr-qc/0406106.

[17]  F. Estabrook,et al.  Time Delay Interferometry with Moving Spacecraft Arrays , 2003, gr-qc/0310017.

[18]  Daniel A. Shaddock,et al.  Implementation of time-delay interferometry for LISA , 2003, gr-qc/0303013.

[19]  S. Larson,et al.  The LISA optimal sensitivity , 2002, gr-qc/0209039.

[20]  J. Armstrong,et al.  Time-Delay Interferometry for Space-based Gravitational Wave Searches , 1999 .