Estimation of the temporal autocorrelation structure by the collocation technique with an emphasis on soil moisture studies

Abstract The collocation technique has become a popular tool in oceanography and hydrology for estimating the error variances of different data sources such as in situ sensors, models and remote sensing products. It is also possible to determine calibration constants, for example to account for an off-set between the data sources. So far, the temporal autocorrelation structure of the errors has not been studied, although it is known that it has detrimental effects on the results of the collocation technique, in particular when calibration constants are also determined. This paper shows how the (triple) collocation estimators can be adapted to retrieve the autocovariance functions; the statistical properties as well as the structural deficencies are described. The coupling between the autocorrelation of the error and the estimation of calibration constants is studied in detail, due to its importance for analysing temporal changes. In soil moisture applications, such time variations can be induced, for example, by seasonal changes in the vegetation cover, which affect both models and remote sensing products. The limitations of the proposed technique associated with these considerations are analysed using remote sensing and in situ soil moisture data. The variability of the inter-sensor calibration and the autocovariance are shown to be closely related to temporal patterns of the data. Editor D. Koutsoyiannis Citation Zwieback, S., Dorigo, W., and Wagner, W., 2013. Estimation of the temporal autocorrelation structure by the collocation technique with an emphasis on soil moisture studies. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 58 (8), 1729–1747.

[1]  Emad Habib,et al.  Analysis of radar-rainfall error characteristics and implications for streamflow simulation uncertainty , 2008 .

[2]  Klaus Scipal,et al.  Structural and statistical properties of the collocation technique for error characterization , 2012 .

[3]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  Performance Metrics for Soil Moisture Retrievals and Application Requirements , 2009 .

[4]  Lawrence R. Parsons,et al.  Performance of a New Capacitance Soil Moisture Probe in a Sandy Soil , 2009 .

[5]  A. Stoffelen.  Toward the true near-surface wind speed: Error modeling and calibration using triple collocation , 1998 .

[6]  Wolfram Mauser,et al.  Uncertainty Assessment of the SMOS Validation in the Upper Danube Catchment , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  Yi Y. Liu,et al.  Error characterisation of global active and passive microwave soil moisture datasets. , 2010 .

[8]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  The Interplay between Transpiration and Runoff Formulations in Land Surface Schemes Used with Atmospheric Models , 1997 .

[9]  Axel Andersson,et al.  Comparison of HOAPS, QuikSCAT, and Buoy Wind Speed in the Eastern North Atlantic and the North Sea , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  G. Reinsel.  Elements of Multivariate Time Series Analysis , 1995 .

[11]  Randal D. Koster,et al.  Soil Moisture Memory in Climate Models , 2001 .

[12]  Allan S. Cohen,et al.  On the Behrens-Fisher Problem: A Review , 1998 .

[13]  Yi Y. Liu,et al.  Developing an improved soil moisture dataset by blending passive and active microwave satellite-based retrievals , 2011 .

[14]  Anthony L Bertapelle.  Spectral Analysis of Time Series. , 1979 .

[15]  Klaus Scipal,et al.  An Improved Soil Moisture Retrieval Algorithm for ERS and METOP Scatterometer Observations , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  Marc B. Parlange,et al.  Physical basis for a time series model of soil water content , 1992 .

[17]  W. Crow,et al.  Estimating Spatial Sampling Errors in Coarse-Scale Soil Moisture Estimates Derived from Point-Scale Observations , 2010 .

[18]  Y. Kerr,et al.  Comparing soil moisture retrievals from SMOS and ASCAT over France , 2011 .

[19]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Spatial correlation of soil moisture in small catchments and its relationship to dominant spatial hydrological processes , 2004 .

[20]  José Martínez-Fernández,et al.  Validation of the SMOS L2 Soil Moisture Data in the REMEDHUS Network (Spain) , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[21]  Wouter Dorigo,et al.  Temporal error variability of coarse scale soil moisture products - case study in central Spain , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[22]  Klaus Scipal,et al.  A possible solution for the problem of estimating the error structure of global soil moisture data sets , 2008 .

[23]  H. Vereecken,et al.  Evaluation of a low-cost soil water content sensor for wireless network applications , 2007 .

[24]  F. Hossain,et al.  Investigating Error Metrics for Satellite Rainfall Data at Hydrologically Relevant Scales , 2008 .

[25]  A. Robock,et al.  The International Soil Moisture Network: a data hosting facility for global in situ soil moisture measurements , 2011 .

[26]  J. Kurths,et al.  Comparison of correlation analysis techniques for irregularly sampled time series , 2011 .

[27]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  An intercomparison of available soil moisture estimates from thermal infrared and passive microwave remote sensing and land surface modeling , 2011 .

[28]  Ernst Linder,et al.  Cold region river discharge uncertainty—estimates from large Russian rivers , 2006 .

[29]  S. Caires,et al.  Validation of ocean wind and wave data using triple collocation , 2003 .

[30]  J. Thepaut,et al.  The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system , 2011 .

[31]  A. Loew.  A dynamic approach for validating coarse scale satellite soil moisture products , 2010 .

[32]  R. Saunders,et al.  Three-Way Error Analysis between AATSR, AMSR-E, and In Situ Sea Surface Temperature Observations , 2008 .