Modelling radiative balance in a row-crop canopy: Cross-row distribution of net radiation at the soil surface and energy available to clusters in a vineyard

Abstract Distribution of energy at the soil surface in a row-crop influences mainly soil temperature and water content, and therefore root activity, nitrogen mineralization and within canopy air temperature, which all affect plant physiology. In the case of a vineyard, it is also closely related to the energy available to the berries and therefore most influential for fruit quality. The aim of this study was to develop a simplified model of available energy distribution at the soil surface and at the bottom of the rows, where most of the clusters are located. Such a model would be helpful for optimising some aspects of row-crop management like training system choice, row geometry, leaf area density, and soil surface maintenance practices. The model simulated radiation balance at the soil surface, split up into downward and upward short- and long-wave fluxes. Row shadows were calculated at any point of the inter-row space, in interaction with actual row geometry and simplified porosity distribution within row volume. All hemispheric radiations (long-wave and diffuse solar radiation) were calculated according to view factors between the row and soil surfaces. Input variables were therefore incoming solar radiation over the canopy, air temperatures near the row walls and soil surface temperatures. Parameters were row geometry, dimensions and porosities. The model was validated in a 7 years old Merlot vineyard in the Medoc area, by comparing model predictions to measured net radiation (Rns) at five positions above the inter-row soil surface. Along the row sampling was achieved by a moving device carrying the net-radiometers. Structure of the vegetation was kept constant during the experiment and gap fraction parameters were derived from pictures of shadows at the soil surface. Since Rns measurements are impracticable directly at the soil surface and horizontal distribution of Rns is heterogeneous, comparison was performed by calculating net radiation at the actual measurement height which was close to average cluster height. Model prediction agreed with field measurement in most conditions, which suggests that all short- and long-wave radiation fluxes, as well as interactions with the canopy structure, were well described. Rns, energy available to clusters, and soil surface temperature variations were all mainly driven by shading due to the rows. Coupling the model to soil heat transfer and convective fluxes to the atmosphere models will help forecasting soil temperature distribution at the surface and in depth as well as canopy microclimate. The model will also be an essential part of a more elaborate model of cluster microclimate, a key determinant of berry quality.

[1]  M. Fuchs,et al.  Row structure and foliage geometry as determinants of the interception of light rays in a sorghum row canopy. , 1980 .

[2]  John G. Annandale,et al.  Two-dimensional solar radiation interception model for hedgerow fruit trees , 2004 .

[3]  Gerard J. Kluitenberg,et al.  Positional variation in the soil energy balance beneath a row-crop canopy , 1993 .

[4]  Claudio O. Stöckle,et al.  A simple approach to modeling radiation interception by fruit-tree orchards , 2007 .

[5]  R. Weaver,et al.  Effect of Temperature and Length of Storage, Root Growth and Termination of Bud Rest in Zinfandel Grapes , 1977, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[6]  Wolfgang Knoll,et al.  Characterization and Applications , 2011 .

[7]  Evaluation of empirical expressions for the estimation of hourly and daily totals of atmospheric longwave emission under all sky conditions , 1979 .

[8]  H. Sinoquet,et al.  Experimental study of fruit temperature dynamics within apple tree crowns , 2009 .

[9]  C. Varlet-Grancher,et al.  Crop Structure and Light Microclimate: Characterization and Applications , 1993 .

[10]  Brent Clothier,et al.  Modeling light interception and transpiration of apple tree canopies , 2003 .

[11]  Dan R. Upchurch,et al.  Energy and water balance of a sparse crop: simulated and measured soil and crop evaporation , 1987 .

[12]  J. C. Ferguson,et al.  Asymmetrical canopy architecture due to prevailing wind direction and row orientation creates an imbalance in irradiance at the fruiting zone of grapevines , 2005 .

[13]  R. Horton,et al.  Soil temperature in a row crop with incomplete surface cover , 1984 .

[14]  Julie M. Tarara,et al.  Separation of Sunlight and Temperature Effects on the Composition of Vitis vinifera cv. Merlot Berries , 2002, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[15]  Michael J. Savage,et al.  Soil and canopy energy balances in a west Texas vineyard , 1994 .

[16]  Effect of root temperature, rootstock and fertilization on bud-break, shoot growth and composition of ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ grapevines , 1980 .

[17]  Mark Krstic,et al.  Cultural Practice and Environmental Impacts on the Flavonoid Composition of Grapes and Wine: A Review of Recent Research , 2006, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.

[18]  Patrick Bertuzzi,et al.  Comparison of methods for estimating actual evapotranspiration in a row-cropped vineyard , 1998 .

[19]  Vin,et al.  Analyse de la croissance des feuilles du sarment de vigne : estimation de sa surface foliaire par échantillonnage , 1976 .

[20]  Michael J. Savage,et al.  Effects of trellising on the energy balance of a vineyard , 1996 .

[21]  K. J. Sene,et al.  Energy and water balances of developing vines , 1992 .

[22]  R. J. Lascano,et al.  Soil and Canopy Energy Balamces of a Row Crop at Partial Cover , 1991 .

[23]  Cristiano Fragassa,et al.  Ground monitoring the light–shadow windows of a tree canopy to yield canopy light interception and morphological traits , 2000 .

[24]  R. Smart Sunlight Interception by Vineyards , 1973 .

[25]  Marcel Fuchs,et al.  The distribution of leaf area, radiation, photosynthesis and transpiration in a Shamouti orange hedgerow orchard. Part II. Photosynthesis, transpiration, and the effect of row shape and direction☆ , 1987 .

[26]  H. Sinoquet,et al.  A 3D model for simulating the spatial and temporal distribution of temperature within ellipsoidal fruit , 2007 .

[27]  Peter B. Høj,et al.  Canopy microclimate and berry composition: The effect of bunch exposure on the phenolic composition of Vitis vinifera L cv. Shiraz grape berries , 2000 .

[28]  R. Snyder,et al.  Data error effects on net radiation and evapotranspiration estimation , 1998 .

[29]  G. Seguin,et al.  ‘Terroirs’ and pedology of wine growing , 1986, Experientia.

[30]  Ray D. Jackson,et al.  Thermal radiation from the atmosphere , 1969 .

[31]  Nick K. Dokoozlian,et al.  Influence of leaf area density and trellis/training system on the light microclimate within grapevine canopies , 2003 .

[32]  L. Mariani,et al.  BerryTone - a simulation model for the daily course of grape berry temperature. , 2009 .

[33]  C. Riou,et al.  Un modèle simple d'interception du rayonnement solaire par la vigne - vérification expérimentale , 1989 .

[34]  J. Fownes,et al.  A simulation model for hedgerow light interception and growth , 2001 .

[35]  W. Kliewer Influence of Temperature, Solar Radiation and Nitrogen on Coloration and Composition of Emperor Grapes , 1977, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.