Stochastic analysis of TPS: expose and eliminate variability by highly specifying WCP

A production system is designed with three elements: works, connections and pathways (WCP), which cover how people work, how people connect and how the production line is constructed, from the point of view of a flow unit. The design principle of highly specifying WCP leads to two operations pillars that support the Toyota production system (TPS): just-in-time (JIT) and autonomation. Some stochastic models are proposed to verify the logic of highly specifying work for JIT. The stochastic models show that works are highly specified to reduce the variability whereas highly specifying connections and pathways without resource pooling expose variability in works as low inventory exposes the hidden problems in a factory. To achieve JIT, highly specifying works in each workstation is fundamental; the key solution is to reduce the variability of works. The information entropy theory is used to verify the logic of highly specifying WCP for autonomation. Highly specifying WCP can reduce the information needed by w...

[1]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  To Pull or Not to Pull: What Is the Question? , 2004, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[2]  Harry G. Perros Queueing Networks with Blocking: Exact and Approximate Solutions , 1994 .

[3]  Jing-Wen Li,et al.  Improving the performance of job shop manufacturing with demand-pull production control by reducing set-up/processing time variability , 2003 .

[4]  Janice H. Hammond,et al.  Toshiba: Ome Works , 1996 .

[5]  Shaojun Wang,et al.  Optimal models for a multi-stage supply chain system controlled by kanban under just-in-time philosophy , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Avishai Mandelbaum,et al.  On Pooling in Queueing Networks , 1998 .

[7]  S. Spear,et al.  Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[8]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  A review and analysis of comparative performance studies on functional and cellular manufacturing layouts , 1998 .

[9]  Mark L. Spearman,et al.  Customer Service in Pull Production Systems , 1992, Oper. Res..

[10]  Daisuke Hirotani,et al.  Comparing CONWIP, synchronized CONWIP, and Kanban in complex supply chains , 2005 .

[11]  Nureddin Kirkavak,et al.  Performance Evaluation Models for Single-item Periodic Pull Production Systems , 1996 .

[12]  David L. Woodruff,et al.  CONWIP: a pull alternative to kanban , 1990 .

[13]  R. Schonberger Japanese manufacturing techniques : nine hidden lessons simplicity , 1982 .

[14]  Zhao Xiaobo,et al.  Generally configured supply chain with flexible local control strategies , 2003 .

[15]  Maria Di Mascolo,et al.  Analysis of a synchronization station for the performance evaluation of a kanban system with a general arrival process of demands , 1996 .

[16]  Hong Chen,et al.  What Actually Happened to the Inventories of American Companies Between 1981 and 2000? , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[17]  Eitan Zemel,et al.  Managing Business Process Flows , 1999 .

[18]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[19]  John A. Buzacott,et al.  Stochastic models of manufacturing systems , 1993 .

[20]  S. Rajagopalan,et al.  Have U.S. Manufacturing Inventories Really Decreased? An Empirical Study , 2000, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[21]  Peter O'Grady,et al.  Kanban controlled pull systems: an analytic approach , 1989 .

[22]  Nancy Lea Hyer,et al.  Research issues in cellular manufacturing , 1987 .

[23]  B. J. Berkley,et al.  Tandem queues and kanban-controlled lines , 1991 .

[24]  James P. Womack,et al.  Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation , 1996 .

[25]  Yves Dallery,et al.  An Analytical Method for Performance Evaluation of Kanban Controlled Production Systems , 1996, Oper. Res..

[26]  Debasis Mitra,et al.  Analysis of a Kanban discipline for cell coordination in production lines , 1990 .

[27]  Asbjoern M. Bonvik,et al.  A comparison of production-line control mechanisms , 1997 .

[28]  Qi-Ming He,et al.  Modeling and analysis of a supply-assembly-store chain , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Maria Di Mascolo,et al.  On the design of generalized kanban control systems , 1995 .

[30]  Taiichi Ohno,et al.  Toyota Production System : Beyond Large-Scale Production , 1988 .

[31]  Zhao Xiaobo,et al.  Analysis of a production system in a general configuration , 2001 .

[32]  Michael A. Zazanis,et al.  Push and Pull Production Systems: Issues and Comparisons , 1992, Oper. Res..

[33]  Robert R. Inman,et al.  Inventory is the flower of all evil , 1993 .

[34]  Debasis Mitra,et al.  Analysis of a Kanban Discipline for Cell Coordination in Production Lines, II: Stochastic Demands , 1991, Oper. Res..

[35]  Nallan C. Suresh,et al.  Coping with the Loss of Pooling Synergy in Cellular Manufacturing Systems , 1994 .

[36]  M. Augier,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision‐Making Processes in Administrative Organizations , 2002 .

[37]  B. J. Berkley,et al.  A Decomposition Approximation for Periodic Kanban‐Controlled Flow Shops* , 1992 .

[38]  Y. Sugimori,et al.  Toyota production system and Kanban system Materialization of just-in-time and respect-for-human system , 1977 .

[39]  John A. Buzacott,et al.  Commonalities in Reengineered Business Processes: Models and Issues , 1996 .

[40]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Factory physics : foundations of manufacturing management , 1996 .