Correlation-distortion based identification of Linear-Nonlinear-Poisson models

Linear-Nonlinear-Poisson (LNP) models are a popular and powerful tool for describing encoding (stimulus-response) transformations by single sensory as well as motor neurons. Recently, there has been rising interest in the second- and higher-order correlation structure of neural spike trains, and how it may be related to specific encoding relationships. The distortion of signal correlations as they are transformed through particular LNP models is predictable and in some cases analytically tractable and invertible. Here, we propose that LNP encoding models can potentially be identified strictly from the correlation transformations they induce, and develop a computational method for identifying minimum-phase single-neuron temporal kernels under white and colored random Gaussian excitation. Unlike reverse-correlation or maximum-likelihood, correlation-distortion based identification does not require the simultaneous observation of stimulus-response pairs—only their respective second order statistics. Although in principle filter kernels are not necessarily minimum-phase, and only their spectral amplitude can be uniquely determined from output correlations, we show that in practice this method provides excellent estimates of kernels from a range of parametric models of neural systems. We conclude by discussing how this approach could potentially enable neural models to be estimated from a much wider variety of experimental conditions and systems, and its limitations.

[1]  J. Victor Temporal impulse responses from flicker sensitivities: causality, linearity, and amplitude data do not determine phase. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[2]  S. Shoham,et al.  Patterned Optical Activation of Retinal Ganglion Cells , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  M. Laubach,et al.  Independent component analyses for quantifying neuronal ensemble interactions , 1999, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  Shy Shoham,et al.  Rapid neurotransmitter uncaging in spatially defined patterns , 2005, Nature Methods.

[5]  Tai Sing Lee,et al.  Adaptive contrast gain control and information maximization , 2005, Neurocomputing.

[6]  Fred Wolf,et al.  Correlations and synchrony in threshold neuron models. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[7]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[8]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  How MT cells analyze the motion of visual patterns , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  G. E. Johnson Constructions of particular random processes , 1994, Proc. IEEE.

[10]  J. Gallant,et al.  Complete functional characterization of sensory neurons by system identification. , 2006, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  Matthew Fellows,et al.  Statistical encoding model for a primary motor cortical brain-machine interface , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Liam Paninski,et al.  Statistical models for neural encoding, decoding, and optimal stimulus design. , 2007, Progress in brain research.

[13]  Duane Q Nykamp,et al.  Full identification of a linear-nonlinear system via cross-correlation analysis. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[14]  Tai Sing Lee,et al.  The role of spiking nonlinearity in contrast gain control and information transmission , 2005, Vision Research.

[15]  Jeffrey C. Lagarias,et al.  Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[16]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population , 2008, Nature.

[17]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spike-triggered neural characterization. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[18]  L. Paninski,et al.  Superlinear Population Encoding of Dynamic Hand Trajectory in Primary Motor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[20]  D. Ringach Mapping receptive fields in primary visual cortex , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  C. Koch,et al.  Multiplicative computation in a visual neuron sensitive to looming , 2002, Nature.

[22]  Shy Shoham,et al.  Generation of Spike Trains with Controlled Auto- and Cross-Correlation Functions , 2009, Neural Computation.

[23]  Jessy D. Dorn,et al.  Estimating membrane voltage correlations from extracellular spike trains. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[25]  Alexander S. Ecker,et al.  Generating Spike Trains with Specified Correlation Coefficients , 2009, Neural Computation.

[26]  Dario L. Ringach,et al.  Reverse correlation in neurophysiology , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[27]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Independent component analysis at the neural cocktail party , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[28]  J. Makhoul,et al.  Linear prediction: A tutorial review , 1975, Proceedings of the IEEE.