Backward compatibility effects in younger and older adults

[1]  P. Allen,et al.  Age-related emotional bias in processing two emotionally valenced tasks , 2017, Psychological research.

[2]  Paul Verhaeghen,et al.  The Elements of Cognitive Aging , 2013 .

[3]  E. Ruthruff,et al.  Lost ability to automatize task performance in old age , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Sandra J. Thomson,et al.  Information continuity across the response selection bottleneck: Early parallel Task 2 response activation contributes to overt Task 2 performance , 2013, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[5]  Scott Watter,et al.  Information continuity across the response selection bottleneck: Early parallel Task 2 response activation contributes to overt Task 2 performance , 2013, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[6]  Jeremy W. Grabbe,et al.  Cross-Task Compatibility and Age-Related Dual-Task Performance , 2012, Experimental aging research.

[7]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Objects and Events as Determinants of Parallel Processing in Dual Tasks : Evidence From the Backward Compatibility Effect , 2010 .

[8]  Sandra J. Thomson,et al.  Parallel response selection in dual-task situations via automatic category-to-response translation , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[9]  E. Ruthruff,et al.  Learning to bypass the central bottleneck: declining automaticity with advancing age. , 2010, Psychology and aging.

[10]  C. Spence.  Cognitive Neuroscience: Searching for the Bottleneck in the Brain , 2008, Current Biology.

[11]  Eric Ruthruff,et al.  Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[12]  Milena Rabovsky,et al.  Is lexical access autonomous? Evidence from combining overlapping tasks with recording event-related brain potentials , 2008, Brain Research.

[13]  Philip T Quinlan,et al.  The nature of phoneme representation in spoken word recognition. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  Jeremy W. Grabbe,et al.  Visual word recognition without central attention: Evidence for greater automaticity with greater reading ability , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  François Maquestiaux,et al.  Success and failure at dual-task coordination by younger and older adults. , 2007, Psychology and aging.

[16]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies , 2006, Psychological research.

[17]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  How does practice reduce dual-task interference: Integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening? , 2006, Psychological research.

[18]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  Frequency effects in spoken and visual word recognition: evidence from dual-task methodologies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  G. Logan,et al.  Parallel response selection in dual-task situations , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Jeremy W. Grabbe,et al.  Visual word recognition without central attention: evidence for greater automaticity with advancing age. , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[22]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Testing the predictions of the central capacity sharing model. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Eric Ruthruff,et al.  Dual-task performance with ideomotor-compatible tasks: is the central processing bottleneck intact, bypassed, or shifted in locus? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  A. Greenwald.  A reminder about procedures needed to reliably produce perfect timesharing: comment on Lien, McCann, Ruthruff, and Proctor (2005). , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  A. Greenwald,et al.  On doing two things at once: IV. Necessary and sufficient conditions: Rejoinder to Lien, Proctor, and Ruthruff (2003). , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Robert W Proctor,et al.  Still no evidence for perfect timesharing with two ideomotor-compatible tasks: a reply to Greenwald (2003). , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  A. Greenwald,et al.  On doing two things at once: III. Confirmation of perfect timesharing when simultaneous tasks are ideomotor compatible. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance , 2002, Psychological research.

[29]  Mei-Ching Lien,et al.  Age differences in overlapping-task performance: evidence for efficient parallel processing in older adults. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[30]  R. Proctor,et al.  Ideomotor compatibility in the psychological refractory period effect: 29 years of oversimplification. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  A. Hartley,et al.  Age differences in dual-task interference are localized to response-generation processes. , 2001, Psychology and aging.

[32]  J. Ridley.  Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[33]  Roger W. Remington,et al.  A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  A. Hartley,et al.  Age-related differences and similarities in dual-task interference. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[35]  B. Hommel.  Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  H. Pashler.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[37]  H. Pashler,et al.  Saccadic Eye Movements and Dual-Task Interference , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[38]  H Pashler,et al.  Making two responses to a single object: implications for the central attentional bottleneck. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference , 1992 .

[40]  Colin M. Macleod.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  A. Greenwald,et al.  On doing two things at once. II. Elimination of the psychological refractory period effect. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[42]  A. Greenwald,et al.  On doing two things at once: time sharing as a function of ideomotor compatibility. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[43]  D. D. Wheeler.  Processes in word recognition , 1970 .

[44]  A. Welford.  THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY , 1952 .

[45]  M. Vince.  The intermittency of control movements and the psychological refractory period. , 1948, The British journal of psychology. General section.

[46]  C. W. Telford.  The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses , 1931 .

[47]  C. L. M..  The Psychology of Attention , 1890, Nature.