Schoolwide Mathematics Achievement Within the Gifted Cluster Grouping Model

An increasing number of schools are implementing gifted cluster grouping models as a cost-effective way to provide gifted services. This study is an example of comparative action research in the form of a quantitative case study that focused on mathematic achievement for nongifted students in a district that incorporated a schoolwide cluster grouping model. Although previous research found that gifted students performed better in the cluster setting, this study sought to determine the effects of the cluster model on nongifted students. Findings from this research indicate that general education students in the gifted cluster classes and those not in the gifted clusters experienced similar levels of academic growth in mathematics. Data disaggregated according to grade level, gender, ethnicity, and English language learner status showed that students achieved at similar rates in mathematics in gifted cluster classrooms and those classrooms without the gifted cluster groups.

[1]  S. M. Moon,et al.  Grouping Gifted Students: Issues and Concerns , 1992 .

[2]  John I. Goodlad,et al.  Individual differences and the common curriculum , 1983 .

[3]  R. Burns,et al.  Class Formation and Composition in Elementary Schools , 1998 .

[4]  S. Owen,et al.  An Investigation of the Effects of Total School Flexible Cluster Grouping on Identification, Achievement, and Classroom Practices , 1999 .

[5]  Tonya R. Moon,et al.  Differentiating Instruction in Response to Student Readiness, Interest, and Learning Profile in Academically Diverse Classrooms: A Review of Literature , 2003 .

[6]  Griffin,et al.  Eighty-Second Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education , 2005 .

[7]  Douglas Fisher,et al.  Handbook of Research on Teaching the English Language Arts , 1991 .

[8]  Marcia Gentry.  Promoting Student Achievement and Exemplary Classroom Practices through Cluster Grouping: A Research-Based Alternative to Heterogeneous Elementary Classrooms. , 1999 .

[9]  Rebecca Barr,et al.  How Schools Work , 1991 .

[10]  J. Plucker,et al.  Mind the (Other) Gap! The Growing Excellence Gap in K-12 Education. , 2010 .

[11]  Grant Wiggins,et al.  Educative Assessment: Designing Assessments to Inform and Improve Student Performance , 1998 .

[12]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Ability Grouping and Student Achievement in Elementary Schools: A Best-Evidence Synthesis , 1986 .

[13]  Gary Manning,et al.  Grouping Students for Instruction. , 1995 .

[14]  S. J. Rosenholtz,et al.  The Effect of Classroom Structure on Shared Perceptions of Ability , 1980 .

[15]  Carol L. Tieso.  The Effects of Grouping and Curricular Practices on Intermediate Students' Math Achievement. , 2000 .

[16]  J. Ysseldyke,et al.  Use of a Progress Monitoring System to Enable Teachers to Differentiate Mathematics Instruction , 2007 .

[17]  John Hollifield.  Ability Grouping in Elementary Schools. , 1987 .

[18]  S. Vaughn,et al.  Instructional Grouping for Reading: Teachers' Views , 1997 .

[19]  R. Saunders,et al.  Improving Performance for Gifted Students in a Cluster Grouping Model. , 2010 .

[20]  Linda B. Gambrell,et al.  Classroom Observations of Task-Attending Behaviors of Good and Poor Readers. , 1981 .

[21]  Joseph P. Robinson.  Evidence of a Differential Effect of Ability Grouping on the Reading Achievement Growth of Language-Minority Hispanics , 2008 .

[22]  Ian Westbury,et al.  The leveling effect of teacher pacing on science content mastery , 1976 .

[23]  Linda Anderson.  Classroom Management: Seventy-Eighth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Daniel Duke , 1981 .

[24]  James A. Kulik,et al.  An Analysis of the Research on Ability Grouping: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Research-Based Decision Making Series. , 1992 .

[25]  Elfrieda H. Hiebert,et al.  An Examination of Ability Grouping for Reading Instruction. , 1983 .

[26]  Takako Nomi.  The Effects of Within-Class Ability Grouping on Academic Achievement in Early Elementary Years , 2009 .

[27]  Naomi S. Baron.  Are Digital Media Changing Language , 2009 .

[28]  Y. Lou,et al.  Within-Class Grouping: A Meta-Analysis , 1996 .